Reply With Quote
naw, the nuthugging is pretty clear.
so is the ut bias.
naw, the nuthugging is pretty clear.
so is the ut bias.
the store called. They're running out of you.
stretch nuthugging
your too stupid to understand what i said
i was alluding to the fact that you are waiting for vince young to somehow force his defensive coordinator to only play vince at defense
somehow get the coach to only play vince on special teams
waiting for the offense to only feature vince with no OL RB or WR
then for vince to win the game
That's what you are waiting for to eat crow. Until that happens, you win.
Good God Blake, you are an idiot..lol...seriously..if we're nuthugging Vince, you are having one nasty -fest with Texas Tech quarterbacks.
all facts...Vince is 2-0 and played a good game
are you denying that Tennessee is more confident with Vince?
Yeah...pretty much. His ability to run opened up 172 yards passing. They have to watch the QB to make sure he doesn't rush, taking their focus off the receivers. Do you watch football? Do you know anything about it?
right now, how many teams would VY would be the starting QB on?
choose your answer wisely for it will determine your nuthuggery.
that's actually a perfect answer.
that's not what you said, hugger
I want to see this list.
whateverthe hisnameis plays in the Mexican Football League (MFL), but Tech QBs have nothing to do with your nuthugging no matter how often you might bring them up.
Harrell would probably trade one nut to be in the NFL.....don't know about the 2nd.Now I see the source of hostility in this thread. 127 NFL yards is 127 Harrell would trade his nuts for right now, lol
The source of hostility is very clearly from all the UT fans in here.
OK...so let me get this straight. We come in and say Vince had a good game, you go all PMS on us for saying it, and we're hostile? Get a life, Blake...get a life, take a pill, pop a pad in, and shut the up.
you posting pictures of feminine products does not lessen your nuthugging as seen in your previous posts.
Let's see:
ans, Raiders, Rams, Redskins, Niners, Dolphins, Tampa, Lions, Browns, Bills for sure.
And arguably in Chiefs, Jaguars, Jets, Carolina.
And in a more personal note (that I know not many will agree with), I think he could do a better job than Orton in Denver.
So quite a few.
your quotes about said pictures doesn't lessen your jealousy that Vince Young is a better QB than any QB ever coming out of Tek-a-Tek...and Vince isn't even great...he's an average QB doing a good job...Tech doesn't even have one of those...
I didn't say he did. That's why I asked questions.
Are you trying to put words in my mouth or are you not able to understand what a question mark at the end of a sentence means?youre such a re , im sure you can go to a local college and take a class on reading comprehension. then maybe you can come back here and carry on a semi intelligent conversation.
you should be able to comprehend what a question is before you get to college.
that was definitely semi intelligent.the mother er has played solid, has nothced another 2 wins and hasnt committed any egregious mistakes. nothing to write home about, but not playing bad.
I would take the "suicial VY" from last year over Cassel.
I am going from loving the Chiefs to hating them...I hate our management
I'm not sure anyone is stupid enough to understand what you just said
What crow am I supposed to eat? The only thing Ive said is that there is a bunch of nuthugging in here.
And the more you get defensive about it, the more apparent it gets.
Your reply to my post showed what a re you are. And then when i spelt it out for you, you ran the opposite way with it.
If you're trolling and trying to get a rise out of people it's cool. But the VY nuthugging in here was realistically a bajillion times less than it would have been say, 2 or 3 years ago. He won the game. That's basically all that needs to be said. Calling that nuthugging just shows you're expecting something unrealistic (like in some fantasy world Vince beating a team 1 QB versus an entire squad, which is what I was saying earlier.)
No, not really. I thought Potts had NFL potential at first, but that's clearly not the case. I never thought Harrell had NFL potential.
You trying to call me out though is a pathetic attempt to deflect the fact that you are nuthugging in this thread.
you spelt it out? what local college that teaches reading comphrension learned you how to speak?
true, but a bajillion times less is still somewhere in the hundred bamillion range.If you're trolling and trying to get a rise out of people it's cool. But the VY nuthugging in here was realistically a bajillion times less than it would have been say, 2 or 3 years ago.
nuthugging.He won the game.
ans won the game. Vince played decent and did nothing to lose it.
nuthugging is saying he won the game, is 2-0 and should have been starting from game 2.That's basically all that needs to be said. Calling that nuthugging just shows you're expecting something unrealistic (like in some fantasy world Vince beating a team 1 QB versus an entire squad, which is what I was saying earlier.)
Then it's settled. You are waiting for the ans to either
1) clone Vince Young, play him at every position on defense offense and special teams, win a game.
OR
2) you're waiting for Fisher to persuade the refs to let him only field one player on the field at all times. And that player be Vince. Then win the game.
After the ans win in either of these two fashions, will you eat crow?
You have a pretty lock-tight argument. I'm just trying to figure out at what point the ans can win a game with him at QB without you scoffing it.
close.
You come in, hug Vince's nut, I call you a nuthugger, you melt down, go all pms, and get hostile by trying to call me out for going on Tech quarterbacks.
good stuff.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
