For Hillary lovers

[z0sa]

About?

What exactly is it you think you're doing? You're guzzling Bernie by the gallon.

Poor you. By Tuesday night you'll have run out of tears when he gets tear a new asshole.

Down 48 pts a month ago, latest poll has him 3 pts down outside the margin of error. He may not win but a valiant effort was made and like i always said, anything but a hige win is an L for Hillary.

[boutons_deux]

Less Opportunity, More Support

Trump and Clinton have performed best in counties considered to have less economic mobility and opportunity

http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/20...-more-support/

low-wage, low-info

[spurraider21]

Less Opportunity, More Support

Trump and Clinton have performed best in counties considered to have less economic mobility and opportunity

http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/20...-more-support/

low-wage, low-info

sounds like your people

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

[boutons_deux]

Firms That Paid For Clinton Speeches Have US Government Interests

It's not just Wall Street banks. Most companies and groups that paid Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors, an Associated Press review has found. Their interests are sprawling and would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall.

The AP's review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that

almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have actively sought to sway the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy and in some cases contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself during her tenure as secretary of state.
Presidents are not generally bound by many of the ethics and conflict-of-interest regulations that apply to non-elected executive branch officials, although they are subject to laws covering related conduct, such as bribery and illegal gratuities.

Clinton's 94 paid appearances over two years on the speech circuit leave her open to scrutiny over decisions she would make in the White House or influence that may affect the interests of her speech sponsors.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fi...+%28TPMNews%29

Yes, Bernie, Hillary is not qualified, she's corrupted.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Firms That Paid For Clinton Speeches Have US Government Interests

It's not just Wall Street banks. Most companies and groups that paid Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors, an Associated Press review has found. Their interests are sprawling and would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall.

The AP's review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that

almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have actively sought to sway the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy and in some cases contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself during her tenure as secretary of state.
Presidents are not generally bound by many of the ethics and conflict-of-interest regulations that apply to non-elected executive branch officials, although they are subject to laws covering related conduct, such as bribery and illegal gratuities.

Clinton's 94 paid appearances over two years on the speech circuit leave her open to scrutiny over decisions she would make in the White House or influence that may affect the interests of her speech sponsors.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fi...+%28TPMNews%29

Yes, Bernie, Hillary is not qualified, she's corrupted.

Do you think she did the same with her foundation contributions?

[boutons_deux]

Do you think she did the same with her foundation contributions?

Probably

One well known way to buy influence is contribute to politicians spouses org, or hire family members

You think hrc is unique, alone in her corruption?

The entire political, judicial class is corrupt

[spurraider21]

Firms That Paid For Clinton Speeches Have US Government Interests

It's not just Wall Street banks. Most companies and groups that paid Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors, an Associated Press review has found. Their interests are sprawling and would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall.

The AP's review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that

almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have actively sought to sway the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy and in some cases contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself during her tenure as secretary of state.
Presidents are not generally bound by many of the ethics and conflict-of-interest regulations that apply to non-elected executive branch officials, although they are subject to laws covering related conduct, such as bribery and illegal gratuities.

Clinton's 94 paid appearances over two years on the speech circuit leave her open to scrutiny over decisions she would make in the White House or influence that may affect the interests of her speech sponsors.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fi...+%28TPMNews%29

Yes, Bernie, Hillary is not qualified, she's corrupted.

not surprising at all that the democrat party is so in love with her, tbh

[TheSanityAnnex]

Probably

One well known way to buy influence is contribute to politicians spouses org, or hire family members

You think hrc is unique, alone in her corruption?

The entire political, judicial class is corrupt

Is this you finally admitting that the FBI's investigation into her private server and emails regarding her foundation and it's contributors is legit?

[boutons_deux]

Is this you finally admitting that the FBI's investigation into her private server and emails regarding her foundation and it's contributors is legit?

No

[TheSanityAnnex]

No

So you think she funnelled money through her foundation from donors illegally while Secretary of State, and that is what the FBI is investigating, yet their investigation is not legitimate. Did I get it correct this time?

[boutons_deux]

So you think she funnelled money through her foundation from donors illegally while Secretary of State, and that is what the FBI is investigating, yet their investigation is not legitimate. Did I get it correct this time?

I have no way of knowing, so I'll leave the biased speculatinf and cheering on the witch hunters to You People.

[boutons_deux]

Oath Keepers Predict Civil War if Hillary Clinton Wins

"The level of hatred among conservatives for that woman is so stratospheric I cannot see any other outcome," claims Oath Keepers website

If Hillary Clinton is chosen by the establishment to take Obama’s place, the result would probably be outright civil war in the U.S.

The level of hatred among conservatives for that woman is so stratospheric I cannot see any other outcome.

It might not happen immediately, but a solid bet would be conflagration within her first term.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/04/...iticus+USA+%29

less gun fellators with their macho man paranoid fantasies, where they murder people (but never get murdered)

[Reck]

Oath Keepers? What kind of name is that?

[TheSanityAnnex]

HuffPo/Salon writer going after Hillary.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/yes-b...b_9726650.html

Reck deploying shield in 3..2..1..

[Reck]

HuffPo/Salon writer going after Hillary.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/yes-b...b_9726650.html

Reck deploying shield in 3..2..1..

How do you figure? Whether she gets indicted or not what do I care?

And maybe if you could get a legit and independent article where they're not Sanders teabaggers I'd take that article seriously. I mean your post is bouton-es like. Salon and Huffpost.

[Mitch]

How do you figure? Whether she gets indicted or not what do I care?

And maybe if you could get a legit and independent article where they're not Sanders teabaggers I'd take that article seriously. I mean your post is bouton-es like. Salon and Huffpost.

Huffpost is perhaps the most unbias and fair media outlet of all...

[Reck]

Case and point..

I've read the same article. I believe the author is a college student. More truthful and impressive than 99.99% of the 'professional' reporters out there.

The comments are a treasure trove, imo. LOL

[Reck]

Huffpost is perhaps the most unbias and fair media outlet of all...

I always see the young turds using them as a source of information where they get all their Sanders the great takes.

[Reck]

Hey Mitch check this guy's unbiased articles.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/

The huff is just as bad as the Washington post when it comes to who do they back tbh.

[Mitch]

I always see the young turds using them as a source of information where they get all their Sanders the great takes.

It's one of botoxdeuce's go-to sources, along with Salon, Fox, Onion and Buzzfeed

[Mitch]

Hey Mitch check this guy's unbiased articles.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/

The huff is just as bad as the Washington post when it comes to who do they back tbh.

The term for him is a bernout. I'm a Bern guy, but I've accepted he's done unless Hillary gets indicted.

[rmt]

I thought Huffington Post was only gonna cover Trump in the entertainment section.

[TheSanityAnnex]

How do you figure? Whether she gets indicted or not what do I care?

And maybe if you could get a legit and independent article where they're not Sanders teabaggers I'd take that article seriously. I mean your post is bouton-es like. Salon and Huffpost.

The fact the you recognized it was bouton-es/Salon/Huffpo and still didn't get the point further solidifies my thoughts on just how ing stupid you are.

[Reck]

The fact the you recognized it was bouton-es/Salon/Huffpo and still didn't get the point further solidifies my thoughts on just how ing stupid you are.

Anyone that doesn't agree with your stupid and far fetch theory is stupid to you. OK.

Keep hunting that elusive duck and keep posting walls of text no one cares about but yourself. I ain't stoping you.