Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 251 to 268 of 268
  1. #251
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    the BBB is also dropping the bomb on maternal health and home health care



  2. #252
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    cutting SSA benefits for disabled adults who live with their parents or elderly people who live with their children

    this isn't thriftiness, it's sadism

    all the Trump regime knows how to do is things up and hurt people

    President Donald Trump’s administration is poised to penalize people like Burton simply for living in the same home as their families, according to four federal officials, internal emails and a federal regulatory listing. The administration is working on a rule change that would deduct the value of a disabled adult’s bedroom from their SSI allotment, even if the family members they live with are poor enough to qualify for food stamps. This would mean slashing the benefits of some of the most low-income SSI recipients by up to a third — about $330 a month in Burton’s case — or ending their support altogether.


    The effort to cut SSI for families who also rely on food stamps, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, was initiated by top White House and Department of Government Efficiency officials last year, multiple Social Security officials said. It marks a second attempt by the Trump administration to quietly but dramatically downsize disability benefit programs overseen by the Social Security Administration, despite those programs’ strict eligibility standards and minimal instances of fraud.


    The likely SSI cut will affect not just younger adults with disabilities such as Down syndrome and severe autism who are still living at home with their low-income parents, but also older people with health or financial problems who have had to move in with their adult children on tight budgets. All told, as many as 400,000 poor and disabled people and indigent older people across the United States could have their support cut or eliminated, according to a ProPublica analysis of actuarial figures from the Social Security Administration.
    https://www.propublica.org/article/t...rents-children

  3. #253
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    It won’t matter if the SNAP program has already determined a family is poor enough to receive aid; anyone living at home beyond age 18 without paying full rent will be treated as if they have a benefactor. The value of their bedroom as well as any income and assets their family may have will be calculated and recalculated as often as every month and deducted from their SSI check.

  4. #254
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    $400 billion for Trump's bribery ballroom, though

    (only $200 billion last year, what happened?)

  5. #255
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    off-setting tax cuts for rich folks on the backs of the neediest people imaginable

    The effort to cut SSI for families who also rely on food stamps, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, was initiated by top White House and Department of Government Efficiency officials last year, multiple Social Security officials said. It marks a second attempt by the Trump administration to quietly but dramatically downsize disability benefit programs overseen by the Social Security Administration, despite those programs’ strict eligibility standards and minimal instances of fraud.

  6. #256
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    Trump makes prescription drugs more expensive

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announcedTuesday that it will end a subsidy program to stabilize premiums of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, in which nearly 25 million people are enrolled.


    Medicare Part D was established through the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. Unlike traditional Medicare, which does not cover most outpatient prescription drugs, Medicare Part D offers stand-alone prescription drug plans through private insurers.

    Roughly 9 in 10 seniors take prescription drugs, and many of them take multiple prescription drugs. Given that Americans pay markedly higher prices for prescriptions than do people in high-income peer countries, promoting affordable prescription drugs is essential. Nearly a quarter of seniors report difficulty affording their prescriptions, and 7% of seniors ration or do not fill prescriptions due to their cost. Starting last year, the Inflation Reduction Act capped Medicare enrollees’ out-of-pocket drug spending. The subsidies, which the Biden administration set up to offset increases in premiums, were supposed to run through at least 2027, but CMS is now moving to end them early.

    https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-med...cription-drugs

  7. #257
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    cut SNAP, hurt grocers

    Hundreds of longtime customers of Fresh Market Place have been kicked off SNAP after President Donald Trump’s sweeping domestic policy law, known as the “Big Beautiful Bill,” added newer, stricter work requirements for the program’s recipients in February.


    In Illinois, the implications threaten not only individual households but also the viability of the Chicago area’s independent authorized SNAP retailers.


    At Fresh Market Place, 25% of the customer base relies on SNAP.


    “The big guys are a little different, but we literally run on penny margins sometimes. And when that much of your clientele is relying on a government resource to come in and shop … we feel it deeply,” Drossos said.
    https://www.chicagotribune.com/2026/...res-snap-cuts/

  8. #258
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    all sticks and no carrots is no way to win elections and remain in power, tbh

  9. #259
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    btw, SNAP has an outstanding ROI: every dollar spent on SNAP generates $1.54 in economic activity.

  10. #260
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672

  11. #261
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672


    An extreme position does not become less extreme just because someone can put forward one that’s even more extreme. Massacring 100 children doesn’t become a moderate position just because someone is advocating killing 200 children.


    This is how we should view the line being pushed by “moderate” voices that we have to deal with the $40 trillion debt with both spending cuts and tax hikes. The reality is that, apart from the military and Homeland Security, there is little fat in spending to be cut, as even Elon Musk inadvertently acknowledged. Insofar as we have a deficit problem, the issue is on the tax side, as can be easilyshown. The rich have been taking an ever-larger share of national income over the last half-century, and they don’t feel like paying taxes on their winnings.


    The major media outlets, which are all controlled by rich people, are pretending to be moderate by saying that we need to both raise taxes and cut spending. But there is nothing moderate about saying that we have to cut programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid because Republicans have given big tax breaks to their campaign contributors.


    Republicans pushed thesetax cuts, knowing they would increase the deficit, but did not make any corresponding cuts in spending because the cuts would be incredibly unpopular. Now they are using their control over the media to insist that these cuts are now absolutely necessary to offset all the lost tax revenue from tax cuts put in place by Reagan, Bush II, and Trump.
    https://www.commondreams.org/opinion...y-higher-taxes

  12. #262
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672

  13. #263
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,173
    No offense Winehole but that chart is not accurate.

    The fed funds rate was 20% in 1981 with a much smaller GDP than todays 3.75% and 30.77 trillion GDP.

  14. #264
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    it didn't remain at 20% forever, but point taken

    SS solvency could probably be fixed well into the next century by removing the contribution cap

  15. #265
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    at any rate, the point remains that the runaway spending that led to our fiscal predicament wasn't social en lements but tax cuts and wars funded off books without fiscal offsets

    it wasn't appropriations that did it to us, it was ignoring the revenue side and stupid wars

  16. #266
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    on the (obviously by now) empirically disproven theory that tax cuts would stimulate the economy and increase tax collections to bridge the revenue gap created by tax cuts

  17. #267
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    are you there, CC?


  18. #268
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    118,672
    Active Users

    There are currently 3933 users online. (1 members and 3932 guests)
    Most users ever online was 78,245, 03-22-2026 at 01:53 PM.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •