Reply With Quote
1. 75 days in 2023
2. 59 days in 2009
3. 58 days in 2022
4. 57 days in 2011
5. 41 days in 2013
6. 36 days in 2020
6. 36 days in 1998
8. 33 days in 1948
9. 32 days in 1951
10. 31 days in 1980
...
15 days in 2025
Hit 96 here today. So close
1. 75 days in 2023
2. 59 days in 2009
3. 58 days in 2022
4. 57 days in 2011
5. 41 days in 2013
6. 36 days in 2020
6. 36 days in 1998
8. 33 days in 1948
9. 32 days in 1951
10. 31 days in 1980
...
15 days in 2025
the models look pretty good -- though they seem to have become too conservative
1. 75 days in 2023
2. 59 days in 2009
3. 58 days in 2022
4. 57 days in 2011
5. 41 days in 2013
6. 36 days in 2020
6. 36 days in 1998
8. 33 days in 1948
9. 32 days in 1951
10. 31 days in 1980
...
16 days in 2025
High of 95 here
If Trump says that's bull then it's bull . He knows more than the scientists do.
Bull is what Trump brushes his teeth with, the aroma escapes every time he opens his mouth
Growing up scientists were saying ICE AGE was coming then the world was going to end because of ACID RAIN and then it it changed to GLOBAL WARMING and now they been wrong so much they just created GLOBAL WEATHER. It has all ready been proven you could make America 100% green and it would not change the Global Temperature.
To me I think the more critical thing to focus on is Water we really need to look out creating massive Salt Water distillers and get a handle on Cloud Seeding. I am also all for helping cleaning up all the rivers and lakes in US and helping cleaning the Ocean. I think money spent on that would help much more people then getting everyone to drive an electric car
"Leaders in climatology and economics agree that climate change is occurring and that is has already caused major economic problems all around the world.”
- March 1974, Henry Kissinger
How old are you, boomer?
It’s a grift to separate honest people from their riches so the alarmists can enrich themselves
Bull .
Solar energy is cheap, and we have batteries now, haven't you heard?
Too bad Trump wants to award this tech to China, don't you think?
ignoring climate change is an anti-civilization mindset
the org putting this out is a group of actuaries
https://actuaries.org.uk/media/wqeft...ith-nature.pdf
Solar does more damage to the environment as you have to mine for all the minerals it takes to build the batteries and solar cells. Also the battery technology though has gotten much better it is still light years away from being counted on to be the main support for electric companies. If you really want to go Green then should support Nuclear Energy as that will allow you to support a lot of base load and once you pay it off it is still the cheapest energy.
But you don't want to go green. Your Facebook overlords have told you solar is bad and you believe them. You're an idiot.
Nuclear power should definitely be part of the mix.
Not sure why it has to be either/or, except for ideological reasons.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgl1pgr2zn8o"God will ask us if we have cultivated and cared for the world that he created for the benefit of all and for future generations, and if we have taken care of our brothers and sisters - what will be our answer, my dear friends?"
DarrinS's race-baiting of the Palisades Fire looks like it was wrong, but never fear
the X news tab has got his back!
goodbye, Paris
muh anomaly
your denial
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
