Reply With Quote
I don't need to. Apparently your conspiracy theory depends on it -- so I will let you define it any way you want to and accept it without reservation.
You're up.
The meeting in Trump Tower with Don Jr was a setup by Fusion GPS funded by the Clinton campaign/DNC.
I don't need to. Apparently your conspiracy theory depends on it -- so I will let you define it any way you want to and accept it without reservation.
You're up.
That's innuendo.
What is your conspiracy theory, TSA?
Walk me through it. The planning and direct funding of the setup.
aren't we still waiting on you to walk us through the standards of having a fisa warrant renewed?
lol walk into the weeds with me
aren't we still waiting on Horowitz to finish investigating all aspects of potential FISA abuse?
Oh the list of questions TSA has dodged is quite long. Blog has left many holes in his understanding of things.
Has anyone confirmed the McClatchy report you claimed was verified? When you claimed it was verified did you realize you were shilling for Fusion GPS?
we dont need horowitz to finish his investigation for you to tell us about the process of having a fisa warrant renewed. horowitz may or may not find abuse.
in the meantime, can you tell us the standard for a renewal of a fisa warrant? you're a few months behind on that one
One doesn't have to wait for that to answer a question about how all FISA warrants get renewed in general.
Don't be so disingenuous -- just say you're dodging the question because it would look bad for you to answer and blog hasn't told you a way to spin it yet.
Well the house is done investigating so I guess it's all over right?
No one else is looking into it.
lol
If I'm a few months behind obviously I didn't give a about it then, what makes you think I do now?
Has anyone confirmed the McClatchy report you claimed was verified? When you claimed it was verified did you realize you were shilling for Fusion GPS?
No, I'm asking you to tell me how Fusion GPS hired its own Russian lawyer client to work for the Clinton campaign.
If there are weeds, they're your own.
Just say you don't actually have anything other than innuendo. It's OK. We all know it.
I said it was getting more anf more verified.
lol shilling
If it turns out to be all wrong, I'm completely fine with that. I've been wrong before.
As have you. You don't deal with being wrong very well. Lord knows you've had a lot of practice.
TSA doesn't give a about the process to renew a FISA warrant despite thinking the IG repot about FISA abuse is super duper important.
strange
ONLY HOROWITZ KNOWS HOW FISA WARRANTS ARE RENEWED NO ONE ELSE
How does something get more verified and more verified by unconfirmed reports sourced by Fusion GPS? Has anyone else confirmed the McClatchy report yes or no?
In Simpson’s Aug. 22, 2017 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee he was asked about the veracity of the Steele dossier. In his answer, Simpson notes that one of the “key lines” in the Steele dossier states that Trump “and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his democratic and other political rivals.” In retrospect, says Simpson, “we now know this was pretty right on target in terms on what it says… [the dossier] depicts them as accepting information. What we have seen to date with the disclosures this year is they were at a minimum super interested in getting information.”
A congressional aide asked Simpson to specify what he meant by “disclosures this year.” Simpson replied: “The Trump Tower meeting.”
So, according to Simpson, the Trump Tower meeting proved the part of the Steele dossier that claimed the Trump team was taking the Kremlin’s dirt is true—meaning that Simpson is virtually admitting that the meeting between Trump Jr. and Veselnitskaya, his business partner, was a set up. The dossier memo that claims the Trump team wanted dirt on Clinton is dated June 20, a week and a half after the June 9 meeting—at which that dirt was offered, and which was arranged to help establish the collusion thesis. In Simpson’s Aug. 22, 2017 testimony, the phrase “disclosures this year” refers to a New York Times article published a little more than a month previously, July 8, reporting that the president’s eldest son met the previous year with a Russian lawyer, who, according to the Times, “has connections to the Kremlin.” Who, you might ask, gave that story to the Times?
Even the Times’ original story on the Veselnitskaya meeting emphasized her links to the Kremlin. That’s the point of the set-up, to underscore her relationship with Russian officials in order to substantiate the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Yet now, that information, which the paper itself reported, has been retroactively imagined away. The purpose of the recent Times story—asserting no one really knew before now of her deep Kremlin links—is to cover the paper’s own role in the operation, while perpetuating the Trump-Russia narrative.
tabletmag.com/jewish-news
Nope.
I'm fine with what I said. You aren't. It's OK.
Yeah, that still doesn't explain how the Clinton's hired the other people who were paying Fusion GPS to work for them through Fusion GPS.
They're your weeds. You have some explaining to do if you want to be believed.
You won't do it.
Last edited by Pavlov; 05-02-2018 at 01:53 PM.
Nope.
I'm fine with what I said. You aren't. It's OK.
Yes, you are fine with spouting innuendo and cowering from any real explanation. You prove that over and over. It's OK.
The best part of all of this is that TSA believes that baby eating Hillary Clinton is the mastermind controlling all of this dirt collected on Trump; that she colluded with the Russians and broke all manner of laws and made government agents do the same. All to amass this mountain of damaging claims and evidence that she never once used during the campaign.
"She thought she was going to win" incoming.
If she thought she was going to win -- why do all that in the first place?
Makes no sense whatsoever.
makes even less sense for all this stuff to only come out after the election
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions