Reply With Quote
I guarantee he won't think.
So we had a certain ocean thing that could only evolve into a beetle, ant, spider, camel spider, gnat, fly, dragonfly, praying mantis, bee, hornet etc etc etc. How many kinds of spiders are there?
You really do believe all this stupid bull don't ya?
I guarantee he won't think.
What's this "only" crap?
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution.
Your lists will not help you now.
So there must still be fish leaving the ocean to start evolving into something else right now....right? What was the last new creature?
As the fish go from sort of a fish as it's in partial evolution where are these creatures?
goddam, you're stupid .
Fish still live in the ocean. Is that your question?.
Been making them ourselves for 25 years tbh.What was the last new creature?
As the fish go from sort of a fish as it's in partial evolution where are these creatures?
What's really sad about this is that no matter what ya say about the freak it means nothing. It makes no impact on the poor little at all, he juist keeps coming.....wow! Totally void of any sort of self respest of any kind, I really do pity this guy, imagine following people around who won't even talk to you, whoa~~~~~~~~~~
Now watch the freak act like nothing is wrong as he just keeps humping away......sad to watch.
Of course something is wrong -- you stopped talking about evolution because I easily answered all your questions.
Now you are going to whimper whaa about me because your mind is weak and you know absolutely nothing about evolution.
You need to make a list quickly. Don't go back to the topic of evolution whatever you do.
Pussy.
I could have set my watch by this poor little re . Worst case of Avante-itist I've ever seen. All these threads down there and where does the freak show up........bummer!
Is there a name for this dsease other than Avante-itist? Is the weido gay and can visualize the 6-2 275 pounds of twisted railroad steel? I bet he sees me me as a big ice cream bar and wants to lick me. Sick little freak.
I see an old fat man terrified by me and whining about me.
Bummer!
Now make a list, pussy.
Anyone figure out why I miss Tino and xmas so much? Now I'm stuck with Blake/ChumpWhocares/Clipper Nation more than ever. Not a brain between them, total leg humpers/leechs.
xmas posts at SpursReport now. If you miss him so much, you will go there right now.
It's a cold morning when on a beach long ago when all of a sudden a little sea thing comes crawling/more a slither out of the abyss, he/she ............now what? And we'd need a male and a female, right? Obviously the climate was perfect as was the diet. So how long did these things live? They could start the evolution process in 20/30 years? What starts evolving in that short of time? So there must have been children.
What dumb is thinking that is eaier to buy than a Masterdesigner?
The fact that you would copy-paste from Wikipedia, rather than explain it in your own words, just goes to prove that you didn't understand Kant at all, which is why you resorted to relying on a third-party source.
It's one thing to invoke the name of a philosopher in conversation to effect an air of intelligence. But if you're going to arrogantly proclaim that you fully understand what they're saying (something not even doctorate holders in Philosophy would say, if they were being candid), then you'd better be able to back it up with proof. In that regard, you failed miserably.
How come you never answer the question "who designed the master designer?"?
http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/8
Generally, finding something to eat is generally secondary to the ability to escape predators, or reproduce in relative safety.
The ability of a fish to briefly leave the water is a very powerful adaptation.here are different kinds of air-breathing fishes. Aquatic air-breathing fishes remain in water and surface periodically to gulp air. This behaviour may be continuous in some species subjected to low oxygen concentrations and high water temperatures, or facultative in species subjected to occasional conditions unfavourable for aquatic respiration. In contrast, amphibious air-breathers emerge from the water to feed, rest, escape predators, find a mate and defend territories. Some species are active on land, such as the mudskippers that are the subject of the next section. Other species are inactive on land and become air-breathers when their aquatic habitat disappears during the tropical dry season. Some lungfishes are in this category and are confined in mud burrows until the rains return. They are without food and enter a hypometabolic state or even aestivate (see Figure 2).
Not hard to imagine that a progressive series of minor adaptations in such populations would lead to variations that allow for more and more time spent out of water, given so positive a selective force.
Evidence asked for, given.
The next steps, of course, are rather obvious:
The young of which tend to look relatively familiar...
Last edited by RandomGuy; 12-03-2014 at 12:29 PM.
Wake me up when you take a basic biology course, or, for that matter, one on genetics.
Not hard to find, more than a few intervening steps were omitted for brevity. Ain't phylogeny grand?
A four year degree is 120 hours.
So you have the equivalent of a college sop re, with no formal training in the sciences, I would guess.
Most common core requirements for first years tend to be heavy in history and english.
http://www.utexas.edu/ugs/core/requirements/2014-2016
I have about 180 hrs at this point, a few courses away from a Master of Accountancy. Spread over a wide variety of subjects, primarily accounting/economics/finance.
Pretty much the same with his attempts at science-y sounding he posts.
Avante: "here is a big long anti-evolution webpage I found"
Anybody: "wow, that is long, what do you think is the best argument there?"
Avante: "LOOK OVER THERE!" (runs away)
http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...-ridicule.htmlIn philosophy, a formal fallacy is a pattern of reasoning which is rendered invalid due to a flaw in its logical structure which can neatly be expressed in standard system of logic, for example propositional logic.[1] An argument that is formally fallacious is always considered to be wrong. A formal fallacy is contrasted with an informal fallacy, which may have a valid logical form and yet be unsound because one or more premises are false.
The presence of a formal fallacy in a deductive argument does not imply anything about the argument's premises or its conclusion. Both may actually be true, or even more probable as a result of the argument, but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described. By extension, an argument can contain a formal fallacy even if the argument is not a deductive one; for instance an inductive argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or causality can be said to commit a formal fallacy.
1) X= "only a moron would buy that bull "
2) Therefore evolution is false.
Maybe you could ask your professor if being a sophist is a good thing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
