Reply With Quote
This is where all of the conspiracy non-theories fall apart.
TSA, Darrin, Chris, et.al., have nothing to counter it.
This is where all of the conspiracy non-theories fall apart.
TSA, Darrin, Chris, et.al., have nothing to counter it.
They don’t typically announce counterintelligence investigations, dummy.
So you're now saying they didn't have it in for Trump?
Have a take for once in your life, Darrin. Step up.
anonymous twitter guy is the real victim here
When your life is kickass:
Buckle up and enjoy the ride Chris. The mental gymnastics we are about to witness will be off the charts.President Trump accused the F.B.I. on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016 campaign “for political purposes”
NYT a few days ago: “Trump is waging war and going to risk the life of an FBI informant”
NYT today: “The informant is Stefan Halper”
The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.
which one of you ing losers that has been pushing the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy theory will be the first to have the balls to admit you were duped from the start?
The role of the informant is at the heart of the newest battle between top law enforcement officials and Mr. Trump’s congressional allies over the F.B.I.’s most politically charged investigations in decades. The lawmakers, who say they are concerned that federal investigators are abusing their authority, have demanded do ents from the Justice Department about the informant.
Law enforcement officials have refused, saying that handing over the do ents would imperil both the source’s anonymity and safety. The New York Times has learned the source’s iden y but typically does not name informants to preserve their safety.
I got to log off I just pee’d from laughter the NYT article is too much and I’m on paragraph 4
for a guy who just sits on the fence and chirps you aren’t very observant.
I fail to understand how even the biggest Trump sucker could orgasm so heavily over this news. TSA won't explain it though.
His imaginary friend just claimed there were over 150 people ratting out the Trump campaign.
So the FBI has a lifelong Republican check out the following guy employed by the Trump campaign:
1) A guy who has been recruited by Russians before and is suspected of tipping the Russians off that the FBI was investigating that. He also has many Russian contacts and appears eager to do business in Russia.
2) Two guys that are leveraged out the ass to a Russian oligarch and worked as an agent for a pro-Russian government in the Ukraine. The two had been laundering money and defrauding banks for years.
3) A guy who someone else had put on their radar because he looked alarmingly cozy with a Russian woman at an ex-spy summit that was later embroiled in a Russian espionage scandal. This guy also worked as a foreign agent for Turkey, made a paid speech for RT and apparently was planning to kidnap a Trukish national in the United States to return him to Turkey.
And Dennisonistas just think they should have all been left alone.
lol
This investigation sure was conducted “by the book”, just as Susan Rice described in a CYA email to herself 16 days after a meeting with Obama, Comey, and Sally Yates.
Edit> and touchy-feely Biden
what does her email mean to you?This investigation sure was conducted “by the book”, just as Susan Rice described in a CYA email to herself 16 days after a meeting with Obama, Comey, and Sally Yates.
Edit> and touchy-feely Biden
You're implying it wasn't.This investigation sure was conducted “by the book”, just as Susan Rice described in a CYA email to herself 16 days after a meeting with Obama, Comey, and Sally Yates.
Edit> and touchy-feely Biden
What do you think really happened, Darrin?
On inauguration day, she had a sudden urge to do ent a meeting that happened two weeks prior. Seems a bit sketchy.
Completely normal to use Hillary’s oppo research for FISA warrants on US citizens. Jeez
"Normal" and "by-the-book" are two different things, Darrin.
What are you saying really happened, Darrin?
Never seen people so suddenly interested in procedure.
Notice Darrin not talking about those caught in illegal activity.
For the dummy crew
No dubious connections for Trump therefore Obama admin was bending over backwards. Sound logic there djohn
Yeah you really have bad reading comprehension skills. Read the tweet again before I have to explain it for you.No dubious connections for Trump therefore Obama admin was bending over backwards. Sound logic there djohn
Perhaps there were no dubious connections.
Explain your "bending over backwards" conspiracy theory please.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions