Hakeem vs Duncan Part 2

[Tmac&Luther]

You ing stupid piece of , he said the Knicks would be favorites in the 00s

I'm sorry whew Holy ....right. you truly are a bum aren't you. holy crap I'm about to bust a freaking gut over here. wow. Did the Miami Heat flash forward and win a le in 3006?

Ewing wasn't . He shot too many jumpers and was vastly overrated by the New York media. If he played in Denver he'd never get in on the first ballot.

What the does Denver have to do with crap??? anyway re ...(BTW dumbass, if Ewing was in Denver and "PLAYED IN DENVER" at that time they easily win a le you idiot...the "rain man" Kemp wasn't a legit center which was ultimently their downfall).. Once again YOU FAIL, sorry but http://www.basketball-reference.com/...ewingpa01.html = you FAIL again....the guy was one of the best centers that ever played the game, too bad you were in diapers then and never saw it (but you're sure as is posting like you did) Oh and don't try to tell me you weren't in diapers......anybody that watched those Knicks teams know exactly what I'm talking about. You're a complete idiot who just walked himself into absolute failure, (especially with the crap you said about Ewing), you're just a kid that simply doesn't know crap about that era.

Starks was a sub-40% chucker. The fact that NY was one shot from a le is more an indictment of Houston's inability to hold leads in games than it is a tribute to their greatness.

Really....hmm, you honestly believe that don't you? You do realize the Knicks were heavy favorites in that series and Houston played some of there best ball in that series....or course you don't, because you don't know crap. You just throw up against a wall and except it to stick when at that time you didn't even know what a basketball was.

If anybody wants to watch a great alltime series in the NBA.....watch the 94 series...it was a 7 game series (not many of those) where every game went down to the wire and is probably one of the most underrated series of all time. This guy doesn't know his Ahole from a hole in the ground.

[baseline bum]

I'm sorry whew Holy ....right. you truly are a bum aren't you. holy crap I'm about to bust a freaking gut over here. wow.



What the does Denver have to do with crap??? anyway re ...(BTW dumbass, if Ewing was in Denver and "PLAYED IN DENVER" at that time they easily win a le you idiot...the "rain man" Kemp wasn't a legit center which was their downfall).. Once again YOU FAIL, sorry but http://www.basketball-reference.com/...ewingpa01.html = you FAIL again....the guy was one of the best centers that ever played the game, too bad you were in diapers then and never saw it (but you're sure as is posting like you did)






Really....hmm, you honestly believe that don't you? You do realize the Knicks were heavy favorites in that series and Houston played some of there best ball in that series....or course not, you don't, because you don't know crap. You just throw up against a wall and except it to stick when at that time you didn't even know what a basketball was.

If anybody wants to watch a great alltime series in the NBA.....watch the 94 series...it was a 7 game series (not many of those) where every game went down to the wire and is probably one of the most underrated series of all time. This guy doesn't know his Ahole from a hole in the ground.

You're the one who doesn't know the playoff run of your own ing team. You can talk better than you can analyze the game. I watched Ewing's whole career, and he was a colossal underachiever, and was never the player everyone thought he'd be out of Georgetown. I can't believe the Robinson gets for getting beaten by Olajuwon when Ewing was completely worthless in his series against Houston. If he was in Denver no one would ever forget the way he all over himself in the 94 Finals. What was his shooting percentage? 30 something? No wonder his team was better off when he started suffering injuries and missing games later on. You gotta be honest; no Spurs fan is ever going to say the 03 Finals were great basketball. The 95 Rockets were a of a team that was exciting to watch, but 94? No way; watching OJ in the split-screen game 4 was way more interesting.

[Tmac&Luther]

You're the one who doesn't know the playoff run of your own ing team. You can talk better than you can analyze the game. I watched Ewing's whole career, and he was a colossal underachiever, and was never the player everyone thought he'd be out of Georgetown. I can't believe the Robinson gets for getting beaten by Olajuwon when Ewing was completely worthless in his series against Houston. If he was in Denver no one would ever forget the way he all over himself in the 94 Finals. What was his shooting percentage? 30 something? No wonder his team was better off when he started suffering injuries and missing games later on. You gotta be honest; no Spurs fan is ever going to say the 03 Finals were great basketball. The 95 Rockets were a of a team that was exciting to watch, but 94? No way; watching OJ in the split-screen game 4 was way more interesting.

Umm, how do I not know my "own team" fill me in on that one? And the reason why Ewing shot poorly was because he went up against one of the greatest defensive players of alltime. (BTW, David Robinson didn't shoot much better.....guess he was a overrated turd too huh?......nobody got dominated like that guy, what Hakeem did to him was epic, legendary) So yeah, like I said before, you obviously didn't see the guy play and don't know crap about his team. Those Knick teams were great, they just played in the wrong era. I do know this, Ewing was a MUCH bigger threat than the make believe MVP y'all had, I bet he's still seeing stars and trying to get the # on that truck.

[baseline bum]

Umm, how do I not know my "own team" fill me in on that one? And the reason why Ewing shot poorly was because he went up against one of the greatest defensive players of alltime. (BTW, David Robinson didn't shoot much better.....guess he was a overrated turd too huh?......nobody got dominated like that guy, what Hakeem did to him was epic, legendary) So yeah, like I said before, you obviously didn't see the guy play and don't know crap about his team. Those Knick teams were great, they just played in the wrong era.

45% isn't much better than 36%? Any more stupid you wanna spew? Why do I ask? Of course there will be.

[Tmac&Luther]

45% isn't much better than 36%? Any more stupid you wanna spew? Why do I ask? Of course there will be.

Sorry, I don't give a crap about "stats', do you want to clarify you're trying to say?

BTW, you've spewed more dumbass to suffice every poster on this board completely.

"er..Hey guys, fudge that 90's Knicks team, they can't win in the 00's, but they can beat the '06 Heat.......durr".

(BTW, with your posts and "stat grabbing" on the Knicks it's easy to see you were in diapers and never saw them play.......sad, this dumbass just said one of the most physical and toughest teams had no shot at winning in the 00's......oh wait then he said the could, but didn't count the Heat as a '00 team, so then he acted like they couldn't

[baseline bum]

36 vs 45 is "clearified" enough.

Nice edit

[Tmac&Luther]

36 vs 45 is "clearified" enough.

Nice edit

or 48% vs 47%, but who's keeping score

[Tmac&Luther]

Nice edit

What "nice edit" you re ....the only time I edited was to add more insults.

[baseline bum]

You're the one who can't count mother er.

[Tmac&Luther]

You're the one who can't count mother er.

I can count just fine.....



1 dumbass, ha..ha..ha

[J.T.]

Man it must be nice living in your "wonderland" where everything you say somehow becomes fact......let me guess, you're king there aren't you and you smoke pot with the Cheshire Cat, infact he's your dealer isn't he?

The Cheshire Cat smoked hookah, not weed, you dumb ing moron.

[Tmac&Luther]

The Cheshire Cat smoked hookah, not weed, you dumb ing moron.

You need to get your money back....apparently he's selling the good to blake. Don't trust that pussy, he's holding out on you.

[anonoftheinternets]

Tmac&Luther please stop embarassing yourself, you are way out of ur league here.

[J.T.]

You need to get your money back....apparently he's selling the good to blake.

Do you live in a gated community?

[Tmac&Luther]

Tmac&Luther please stop embarassing yourself, you are way out of ur league here.

What is this opposite day... I'm doing just fine thank you. Thanks for the concern though..really appreciate it.

Oh P.S.

Why the isn't y'all's boy owning this poll on his home board? Questions that need to be answered.. hmm.

[baseline bum]

What is this oppisite day... I'm doing just fine thank you. Thanks for the concern though..really appreciate it.

Oh P.S.

Why the isn't y'all's boy owning this poll on his home board? Questions that need to be answered.. hmm.

Because Rocket fans can't let go of the time they mattered 14 years ago?

[anonoftheinternets]

Because Rocket fans can't let go of the time they mattered 14 years ago?

well it isnt fair to paint all rocket fans with the same brush. Its obvious this kid saw some videos and read some blog to give him his opinion. I say let him be.

[Tmac&Luther]

Do you live in a gated community?

Nope, I stay in the average neighborhood, you know brick house, picket fence..the whole nine yards....but on other nights I can be found in yo mom's bed, but things are starting to get hairy down there if you know what I mean. well maybe you don't, we'll have a talk next week.

[Tmac&Luther]

Because Rocket fans can't let go of the time they mattered 14 years ago?

and you can't let go of the thought that you think you're right or that you think you know what you're talking about. ("94 Knicks can't win a le" = ultimate fail dumbass)

AGAIN, Hakeem is even with your boy on his own damn court in this poll....lucky this is "spurstalk" and not a unbaised board huh?

[Thomas82]

Only a bias little fool would say Emmitt was better than Sanders. But the comparisons are great. Sanders=Hakeem, Emmitt=Duncan.

I'm not biased, but my opinion on that particular subject is not a popular one.

[Thomas82]

12 Bruce Bowen
10 Speedy Claxton
21 Tim Duncan
35 Danny Ferry
20 Emanuel Ginobili
3 Stephen Jackson
25 Steve Kerr
9 Tony Parker
50 David Robinson
31 Malik Rose
8 Steve Smith
42 Kevin Willis


35 Jason Collins
12 Lucious Harris
24 Richard Jefferson
2 Anthony Johnson
5 Jason Kidd
30 Kerry Kittles
6 Kenyon Martin
55 Dikembe Mutombo
54 Rodney Rogers
21 Brian Scalabrine
8 Tamar Slay
34 Aaron Williams

Let me guess. Was it Jason Collins or the 40 year old Mutombo that Duncan had to guard. Im just saying...

Well, you asked if anybody had won a le without a second all-star, and I gave you an answer. Tim Duncan was the only all-star that the Spurs had in 2003.

[spursfan09]

I would rather have 4 championships than 2 so I pick Duncan. O yeah! And cuz I'm a Spurs fan. But seriously are you taking into account how long Tim's teams have dominated. It wasn't just 2 years, its been a span of 10 years basically.

[kingmalaki]

You ing stupid piece of , he said the Knicks would be favorites in the 00s, not just favorites in one ing cherry-picked year. You could list practically every team that's ever been to the Finals and say they'd beat the 06 Heat. Ewing wasn't . He shot too many jumpers and was vastly overrated by the New York media. If he played in Denver he'd never get in on the first ballot. Starks was a sub-40% chucker. The fact that NY was one shot from a le is more an indictment of Houston's inability to hold leads in games than it is a tribute to their greatness.

I'm assuming since you say you stopped reading at the NY Knicks that you didn't notice my entire post, mainly the bolded part.

I'm sure you will disagree, but I think all of the following teams would be favorites to win les in the 00's:

1992 Blazers
1993 Suns
1994 Knicks
1995 Rockets
1995 Magic
1996 Sonics
1997 and 98 Jazz
1999 Spurs

If you want to say the 3peat Lakers are better than all of those teams then I may agree. But the secondary teams from this decade? All of those teams that made the Eastern Finals when the Spurs and Lakers won? Were the 06 Pistons really better than any of the above teams? The 03 Spurs? The Kings teams that challenged the lakers....did they really have more talent than the Jazz, Sonics or Blazers? Nash and Amare dominate but KJ and Barkley couldn't? Payton and Kemp with all the insane depth on those Sonics teams, and they actually did play defense.

Additionally, Hakeem did play like 7 seasons in the 80's, and got to the Finals once. Do you think the 00's were better than the 80's as well?

Sorry, but I'm not looking at the current teams and seeing how they were better than teams from the 90's. The only way that argument seems to make sense is if you compare the runner ups from the 90's to the winning teams from the 00's. I don't see how one can really argue that the runner ups from this decade are better than the above teams, especially the ones from the Eastern Conference. I don't think too many will agree that the 90's Bulls wouldn't be winning today, or the 91 Pistons...that's 7 of the 10 les from the 90's. So even if you compare le winning teams from that decade, the 90's still comes out ahead. And I still would take most of those above teams over basically every le team today but the 3-peat Lakers, the 08 Celtics and possibly the 05 Spurs.

As far as the Knicks are concerned, Ewing did shoot a lot of jumpers, but like Robinson he made most of them. He did so poorly (offensively) in the 94 Finals because Hakeem was D'ing him up. As another poster noted, if Hakeem doesn't block Starks jumper in Game 6 then the Knicks probably win (he was on fire that game) and he is remembered for that instead of the Game 7 debacle. The Knicks were in that series not because we blew leads, but because their great defense made it difficult to score!! And again, they took the le Bulls to 7 games in 92 and 6 games in 93. The Knicks were a very good team.

[GaryJohnston]

4>2 = duncan

end thread

[djohn2oo8]

4>2 = duncan

end thread

We are talking about whose the better INDIVIDUAL player, not rings...