Game 6: Lakers @ Nuggets

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

Damn!!!!!! That's a big fish, nicely done K-Mart!!!!

[TheManFromAcme]

If the Lakers aren't going to win this tonight they better be careful and at least keep it close. A blow-out by Denver will carry over to the next game regardless if it's at Staples. You really can't factor HCA with game 7's especially if the previous game was won outright. Player persona speaking, a team like Denver has the potential of "tuning-out HCA crowds. I really want to see the Lakeshow close this out. They need to.

Word to the wise

.....I deserve a

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

.....I deserve a

Here ya go...

[TheManFromAcme]

What's your point?

Pop and Duncan have four les together. Regardless how they got them!!!

Larry Bird has three championships and they were not in a row.

To me...this is one of the silliest criticism against a championship team. You didn't get them in a row. Oh boy!!

They still won multiple championships!!

You are partially correct. Those Spurs teams that won all their championships were damn excellent, well coached teams. They dominated all thier series and won in a convincing manner HOWEVER; To solidify and cement greatness and above all domination, you have to at least win a back to back. I am not saying the Spurs couldn't do it because those Spurs teams were built to contend year in/year out but luck and destiny had something else to say about that which I know stinks. I, as a fan for that matter, view the Spurs as one of the great teams of this decade but that's the only time frame I am giving them. 10 years. One back-to-back would have cemented them firmly and I emphasize "firmly". So, yes, winning more than just "every other year" sometimes doesn't cut it for Mr. ESPN man. As a fan you'll take em no matter how you get em.

[TheManFromAcme]

Here ya go...

Thank you sir may I have another......

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

[TheManFromAcme]

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

[MarHill]

You are partially correct. Those Spurs teams that won all their championships were damn excellent, well coached teams. They dominated all thier series and won in a convincing manner HOWEVER; To solidify and cement greatness and above all domination, you have to at least win a back to back. I am not saying the Spurs couldn't do it because those Spurs teams were built to contend year in/year out but luck and destiny had something else to say about that which I know stinks. I, as a fan for that matter, view the Spurs as one of the great teams of this decade but that's the only time frame I am giving them. 10 years. One back-to-back would have cemented them firmly and I emphasize "firmly". So, yes, winning more than just "every other year" sometimes doesn't cut it for Mr. ESPN man. As a fan you'll take em no matter how you get em.

Good response.

But the issue wasn't that the Spurs is the greatest team or greatest dynasty ever......then I would say you are correct. Moreover, the Spurs have only stepped into the forefront as champions in the last 10 years. Just like the Chicago Bulls did in the 90's.

My point was multiple championships is multiple championships...regardless if you got them in a row or not.

It is like someone went to college and graduate in 4 years with honors and someone went to college and graduate in 5 or 6 years with honors. You both graduate from college with honors...and nothing can change that.

If you are really criticizing someone for not graduating college in 4 years even though they did graduate college the same way you did but a year or two later....then you have lost all perspective.

With that analogy......the point is both teams got the job done and history will state multiple championships!!!