Reply With Quote
Then tell me what your theory is about the origins of life, and give whatever evidence supporting it you have.
I won't I can argue with that, and by doing so you can see I know facts for lies,
I would only wish you did also.
Then tell me what your theory is about the origins of life, and give whatever evidence supporting it you have.
I want to know why the earth doesn't have something you say its dead i say show me the bones what is hard to figure out?
You Darwin lovers love to pull out those old bones and fossils when you want to make your point about Evolution but the bones and fossil are not around to prove my theories?
Ummmm... interesting, the bias force seems to be strong with this one young LukeChumpDumper
Will a 60 million year old tree do?
A massive 60-million-
year-old petrified tree stump, a cast of a Bison latifrons skull,
and a petroleum industry display are among the many exhibits
in the visitors’ center that interpret the prehistory and history
of McKenzie County.
Trees don't have bones.
Why are you trying to change the subject to bones?
Again, you asked about living trees.You Darwin lovers love to pull out those old bones and fossils when you want to make your point about Evolution but the bones and fossil are not around to prove my theories?
Why are you trying to change your own subject?
long ago super intelligent beings found a planet with water food and air and left many human life forms in different regions of the earth to monitor them and see how well they do. Some advanced and became smart while others never did developed enough intelligence and started to believe they evolved from snails.
Proof of intelligent design?
Me being able to argue with one of these unintelligent Darwin loves miles away using a computer.
I really don't care how many apes you stick in a room with laptops over millions of years your not going to see for evolution, just a bunch of dumb apes tossing their at each other and starting trouble,
and frankly If I really waned to see that? I can visit the ST politics forum.
Did these beings just appear out of nowhere? Do you know what "origin" means?
I can see this tree is something your not in any mood to debate.
Live tree, dead tree they are all under 10,000 years. So I will give you a pass, you can stop your circler arguing techniques.
here is an easy one.
The rim of Niagara Falls erodes at four to five feet per year, indicating that it could not be more than 10,000 years old. your thoughts?
That is a question you can ask them not me. I am not here to prove where you came from I am here to expose your lies. I rather believe some vato that looks like Jerry Garcia made all this than to assume we evolved from hot soup.
Wouldn't you? Don't you want to be part of outside intelligent force? or a snail?
I am very much in the mood to debate why the oldest living tree is "only" 10,000 years old.
I say it is because trees die.
Do you disagree?
Wonderful circular logic.
Except for the countless ones that are older. Like the one I mentioned in an earlier post being 60 million years old. Moron.
You're not really that stupid are you?
I'll look for 'em.
What lies?I am not here to prove where you came from I am here to expose your lies.
Did the superior beings evolve from hot soup?I rather believe some vato that looks like Jerry Garcia made all this than to assume we evolved from hot soup.
I'm secure enough so no. I guess you need that help with your psyche.Wouldn't you? Don't you want to be part of outside intelligent force? or a snail?
There went his debate street creeds.
Just stating the obvious. I'll delete it if it means you actually answer the questions. Oh and I'll delete it if you comment on the 60 million year old tree.
Are you serious? Your lazy ass can't go back two pages and see how I exposed your bull Ice core earth age theory? And save me the trouble show me this 60 million year old tree.
I only ask that you answer one question.
How did the superior beings come to be?
I believe that the Great Lakes and subsequently Niagara Falls were formed as the glaciers receded after the most recent ice age, which was indeed about 10,000 years ago.
So I completely agree with you on the age of Niagara Falls. We probably differ on the age of the ground upon which the lakes and falls formed.
Not sure and don't care I am about lies in the text books please try and stay focused.
I an not Zosa.
I have a bull Ice core earth age theory?
And save me the trouble show me this 60 million year old tree.https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndfossil/exhibits/pdf/stump.pdfThe base of the stump was embedded in a one foot thick
bed of lignite indicating that the tree was growing in a swamp
about 60 million years ago. The roots radiating from the
stump were carbonized and turned into lignite whereas the
stump was petrified with most of the wood replaced by
silica. The stump is probably bald cypress (Taxodium)
suggested by the nature of the bark, configuration of the
roots, associated leaf fossils found at the site, and because it
was growing in a swamp. Other petrified tree stumps, also
probably cypress, dot the landscape around the excavated
stump.
So you believe in the Flood?
Oh so if they evolved that was ok. You wouldn't care.
Do you own these textbooks?I am about lies in the text books please try and stay focused.
I used to think mouse was smart just a huge jackass. I guess I was only right about one of those.
I believe in floods.
Just read the ice core stuff.
They don't visually date the ice. They date using gas molecules.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
