i am unequivocally against Bonner's return to Spurs but using a vaguely eugenic argument to justify the lack of respect he gets is a reach. It's about ability, not race
I agree with this 100%. I remember noting this after a few games in April:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=150496
Unfortunately, this will always be the case and likely hurt the Spurs if they choose to bring him back. I am however, going to stick with my approval of bringing Bonner back as the 5th big off the bench because he would likely get much more respect from the refs (defensively) going up against the opposing team's bench than he would the starters - but I am not in favor of bringing him back if he's placed ahead of the top 4 bigs (of course, assuming Splitter signs).
i am unequivocally against Bonner's return to Spurs but using a vaguely eugenic argument to justify the lack of respect he gets is a reach. It's about ability, not race
So has there actually been any news on this front in days, or has this thread devolved into another "I want him/I don't want him" argument thread?
It's about the fact that he's the first big off the bench when he should be a role player. It's about the fact that he's playing interior defense against first line players. It's about the fact that he commits fouls and doesn't get superstar calls.
This is not a bad point and, when combined with his choke-artistry, may explain the uncanny momentum-killing effect he has when he steps on the court. When he checks in, it's like the other team are a bunch of Great White sharks and Pop has just dumped a bucket of chum in the water: it's a feeding frenzy for the other team.
Neither, actually. It's about a 20:1 ratio in favor of Bonner haters. But for the most part, we've moved past just kicking him in the nuts and have now begun analyzing precisely why he is almost entirely worthless in a Spurs uni.
![]()
As funny as this analogy is, its eerily accurate. And with Bonner all it really takes is one of those typical touch/barely any contact type fouls in a crucial situation that they love to whistle him on to make him hang his head in shame and stop playing even his normal "matador" defense. And then the opposing team basically gets a confidence surge knowing that ref has their back and Bonner won't be playing anything resembling "defense" the rest of the game.
Just looking at this from the POV of Matt Bonner, I would argue he has the ability to play fair defense (seen flashes of it). The ability is there but he is basically limited to playing "matador" defense (ie not attempting to hinder, block or otherwise stop an offensive player). And for a guy playing "matador" defense (which is to say, almost zero defense) he gets whistled well more than his fair share IMO.
Let's not forget either that Bonner has got to be one of (if not the most) singled-out player in the league as far as officiating goes. The guy is basically playing defense with an arm tied behind his back. As soon as he moves the officials blow their whistles and call a foul on the guy.
We've all witnessed this hateful treatment by the league's refs towards the guy .. Bonner hanging his head in shame, muttering obscenities under his breath, while he basically gets raped the other way and nothing is called.
BWAHAHAHA...it's because he's a black superstar, right? Give me a friggin break.
I don't know where Bonner is signing.
All I know is that he is a free agent.
He's out there.
And rumor has it he's booked an hour of time on the Fly Fishing Channel tomorrow night . . .![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)