Reply With Quote
Except for the fact you jumped to personal insults instead of explaining what I supposely missed.
You called me out initially to get a response. You got it and immediately went on the attack.
For s sake you even said it yourself.
think a bit more
Except for the fact you jumped to personal insults instead of explaining what I supposely missed.
You called me out initially to get a response. You got it and immediately went on the attack.
Watyta think about this name, Reck?
KKKlinton
White Power!
Not surprising that someone born pre 60s was a racist and was involved in these kind of activities.
Being a racist doesn't mean you're a terrible human being though. Dont condone this but people born in those times are likely to have racist friends today.
Shillary is the guy and Reck is the dog, tbh
Does that mean I make more than you in a week than you make in an entire year?Shillary is the guy and Reck is the dog, tbh
I don't think dogs earn income
Is Hillary Clinton ‘Honest’?
So, when one considers Hillary Clinton’s “honesty” more should be in play than simply whether she accurately describes her policy positions half the time.
Honesty, as most people would perceive it, relates to a person’s fundamental integrity, strength of character, readiness to acknowledge mistakes and ability to learn from them.
On that measure, the American people seem to have sized up Hillary Clinton pretty well.
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/04/24/is-hillary-clinton-honest/
Well said...
For example, in the NY debate when she was asked if she supports the "fight for $15" as a matter of federal policy, she ignored the question and said she supported certain localities that had essentially already passed such legislation at a local level. She tried to blur the difference between her real policy (i.e. a $12 per hour federal minimum wage -- which she tried to avoid stating clearly) and her rah-rah rhetoric towards workers (i.e., that she won't rollback the $15 minimum wage legislation that they already achieved without her help). How courageous! There's something wrong with a candidate that relies on confusing voters to win.
LOL, Hillary having to publicly reject a possible Koch brother endorsement. What an embarrassment.
But Hillz loves the rigged, disenfranchising, anti-insurgent system of Dem superdelegates, and pockets many $Ms from BigCarbon.
and you'll be voting for her in november
Anyone but a Repug
after all your ranting you will be voting for a pro-disenfranchisement, BigFinance shill
That newest national poll gives Hill just a +3 advantage, might be a sign of change if we get another poll showing the same tbh
I won't.
Anyone but a Repugafter all your ranting you will be voting for a pro-disenfranchisement, BigFinance shill
I will proudly be supporting Mr. Donald J. Trump.
Things looking good for Trump - even if he doesn't make the 1237, he'll probably be able to pick up enough unbound delegates to push him over the top.
I think so too. The Cruz-Trump Pact is desperate and will likely fail.
I asked this question a while back but didn't get an answer...
What does that mean exactly? If eithe of them are ahead in the national poll. What difference does that make when it comes to selecting a nominee?
Polling tends to predict trends well, it helps make a case at conventions when two people have good shots at becoming the nominee. If Trump is fairly close to Hilary, then it would mean Cruz can't pull out his "I am the only one who can beat hilary because of polls" card.
Oh you're talking about Hillary vs Trump? OK
I meant between Sanders and herself.
You keep hearing about how they're neck and neck nationally. I just want to know what that does for the nomination in the democratic party. I dont see the point of pitting them head to head nationally when only one can be in the general elections.
You mean polls where you have the Democrat candidates or Republican candidates together? That one is supposed to show how united each candidate has the party and they often poll leaners and toss that into the numbers to show crossover unity. Personally I don't see too much value in that kind of polling except in special cases like with Trump and the notion that republicans wouldn't vote for him.
Bombs Poll: Nearly 20% Of Republicans Will Vote For Hillary Clinton If Trump Wins
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/04/...iticus+USA+%29
Those 20% would still be voting for a center right, neoliberal (deregulate everything), neocon (bomb every in the eternal GWOT) Repug.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions