Reply With Quote
Hillary totally disregarded the NDA she signed, I hope the pissed off FBI agents do the same. Leaks will be coming soon.
So the investigators sign and are sworn in but the subject of the investigation isn't.
Hillary totally disregarded the NDA she signed, I hope the pissed off FBI agents do the same. Leaks will be coming soon.
You still not letting go off your fantasy? Move on already. This is a done deal.
They don't think for themselves and they are only regurgitating the death throes they read off drudge and the like. I'm actually enjoying the obvious desperation and hedging going on. Now that this doesn't appear to be working I'm looking forward to the GOP really jumping the shark. Maybe another run for Palin?
done deal
You truly believe that?
Are you aware the State re-opened their investigation? Are you aware Clinton lied under oath to congress (confirmed by Comey) This isn't over by a long shot.
Yes, I do and it is.done deal
You truly believe that?
Weren't you the one saying she would get indicted on the account of your close sources? You have to take things for what they are man. I dont know how you can live so vicariously through this happening. You only set yourself for dissapointment.
Going forward, anything that comes out of this will be choked up to the mad republicans not letting it go. Just like the Benghazi witch hunt which ended up in 9 investigations and none of them found digly squat on her.
Republicans will waste away tons of tax payers money and that will only reflect bad on them as it always does.
Sadly I agree with Reck on this for different reasons.
Clinton lied her ass off to congress and Comey proved it.
That being said, no way in Lynch lets it go to a grand jury for indictment.
The fix is definitely in.
There are two open congressional investigations, an internal inquiry by the State Department, and a court proceeding that could see Clinton deposed.
It's something that was in motion.
They stopped their internal review as to not get in the FBI's way. Now that the FBI investigation is over, they resumed their review on the emails. Nothing is going to come out of that.
It might do you well to know that Hillary is not the target on this particular internal review.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...4fa_story.htmlOne possible outcome of such internal reviews is that employees, even if they no longer work there, could face a range of disciplinary actions, from having notes placed in their employment files to losing their security clearances.
Holy , you got your facts twisted.
Comey never said she lied under oath. A while ago I asked you a question and you conviniently avoided it.
So, again..
Did you watched Comey's hearing in it's completion?
If you did then you wouldn't bring that up that Comey comfirmed she lied.
In fact, he said she didn't lie to them. It was the idiot head of the comitte who was pushing his agenda on Comey and failed.
So so much for your "Comey comfirmed" bull ."We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI," Comey told House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) during one of the hearing's opening exchanges.
Chaffetz then asked whether Clinton lied to the public. "That's a question I'm not qualified to answer. I can speak about what she said to the FBI," Comey said.
Asked whether Clinton lied under oath, Comey remarked that she did not do so to the FBI. Asked whether he had reviewed Clinton's testimony from last October's Benghazi hearing in which the former secretary of state told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that "there was nothing marked classified on my emails," Comey said that he had not.
"Did the FBI investigate her statements under oath on this topic?" Chaffetz asked, to which Comey responded, "Not to my knowledge. I don't think there's been a referral from Congress."
Are you really this stupid?It's something that was in motion.
They stopped their internal review as to not get in the FBI's way. Now that the FBI investigation is over, they resumed their review on the emails. Nothing is going to come out of that.
It might do you well to know that Hillary is not the target on this particular internal review.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...4fa_story.html
Holy , you got your facts twisted.
Comey never said she lied under oath. A while ago I asked you a question and you conviniently avoided it.
So, again..
Did you watched Comey's hearing in it's completion?
If you did then you wouldn't bring that up that Comey comfirmed she lied.
In fact, he said she didn't lie to them. It was the idiot head of the comitte who was pushing his agenda on Comey and failed.
So so much for your "Comey comfirmed" bull .
In conclusion of the FBI's investigation Comey confirmed she sent classified do ents through her emails, there is no arguing this.
When testifying before congress under oath Clinton said she never sent any classified emails.
By default Comey has confirmed she lied while under oath to congress.
Reck has a difficult time comprehending basic logic.
Apparently you cannot read.
My post completelty refutes your claim that he confirmed she lied under oath. Nowhere does it say she did.
One of my quote reads...Did Hillary Clinton lied under oath? Comey's reply was...she did not do so to the FBI.
Not my words.
But keep spinning for an angle. Something tells me you're grwo thorns waiting.
God damn it stop being so stupid. I'll walk you through it for s sake.
Did Comey confirm she sent classified information through her email yes or no?
Did Clinton testify under oath to congress she did not send classified information through her email yes or no?
Now you're jumping through hoops.
Your first question was that Comey confirmed that she lied to congress. Where does it say that? Can you please give me a direct quote?
I'm working with what he said at the hearing, not some make believe.
You're asking two entirely different questions here. Did she lied to congress and did Comey confirmed she lied to congress.
The latter didn't happened at all. Comey never said she lied to congress because he wouldn't know.
just answer the two simple questions
Did Comey confirm she sent classified information through her email yes or no?
Did Clinton testify under oath to congress she did not send classified information through her email yes or no?
Why would I answer your questions when you cant answer mine?
Seems to me you're singing a new tune now. Fiirst it was Comey confirmed she lied to did she sent clasified information.
You ed up. Admit it.
i didn't up, you are just too stupid to put 2 and 2 together. I'm trying to help you, answer the questions with a simple yes or no.Why would I answer your questions when you cant answer mine?
Seems to me you're singing a new tune now. Fiirst it was Comey confirmed she lied to did she sent clasified information.
You ed up. Admit it.
Did Comey confirm she sent classified information through her email yes or no?
Did Clinton testify under oath to congress she did not send classified information through her email yes or no?
When common sense fails, insult your way through the point you're trying to make...and failing.
TSA, you've done quite the 180 in here. You started out asking one sets of questions and ended up asking different questions when I disproved your claim.
What's simple about this is that Comey never confirmed Hillary lied to congress as you behemently claimed. Oops.
You cant just make up then ask different questions when you get callled out.
Or you can show me where he even said anything remotely close to what you're saying and I'll concede. I'll wait.
Use post #281 for reference if you forgot your own question.
I'm sorry for insulting you I will refrain from calling you stupid, for the time being. Now please stop avoiding my questions.
When common sense fails, insult your way through the point you're trying to make...and failing.
TSA, you've done quite the 180 in here. You started out asking one sets of questions and ended up asking different questions when I disproved your claim.
What's simple about this is that Comey never confirmed Hillary lied to congress as you behemently claimed. Oops.
You cant just make up then ask different questions when you get callled out.
Or you can show me where he even said anything remotely close to what you're saying and I'll concede. I'll wait.
Use post #281 for reference if you forgot your own question.
Did Comey confirm she sent classified information through her email yes or no?
Did Clinton testify under oath to congress she did not send classified information through her email yes or no?
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/rev...d-information/Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three do ents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Apparently TSA is too stupid to tell the difference between lying and telling apparent untruths. It once again comes down to intent.
Uh no.
classified information NDA she signed
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/doc.../c05833708.pdf
https://m.fbi.gov/#https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
Again lying to investigators requires proof of intent. Nuance is tough I know.
Where is all the outrage towards the state department employee who was mistagging classified do ents? It's obvious that the interest here is not in national security and instead partisan axe grinding.
This conversation is pointless. She isn't getting indicted.
"We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI," Comey told House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) during one of the hearing's opening exchanges.
I already went over this with him. He doesn't seem to get it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
