Sadly after the Vault 7 release Alex Jones is becoming as credible as those in the MSM
Tomahawk maker's stock up after U.S. launch on Syria
http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/07/inve...hawk-missiles/
Kinda dipped back down after people figured out there wasn't much damage.
Sadly after the Vault 7 release Alex Jones is becoming as credible as those in the MSM
Operational how? Because a 2 planes "possibly" took off according to SOHR said so? When these 2 planes that "possibly" took off come back where will they refuel and restock munitions?
Sorry I had to expose yet another one of your twitter s
Syrian Observation on Human Rights
One man circus
England
60 million dollars later Planes are taking off![]()
What is this shill TSA on about now?
Do you have any other source saying this besides SOHR? Everything you have linked so far has gone back to the Syrian propagandist who lives in England, even your Reuters article links back to the one man fraud that is SOHR.
Ignore this a third time?
Operational how? Because a 2 planes "possibly" took off according to SOHR said so? When these 2 planes that "possibly" took off come back where will they refuel and restock munitions?
TSA literally doesn't understand the word "operational"
DJohn and Reck are so clueless they don't get the purpose of a symbolic strike.
Apparently they would have preferred we not give the Russians a heads up and use tactical nukes so we could really up the place and kill a lot of Russians and Syrians.
So to avoid future chemical attacks you avoid hitting the runways![]()
If you understood the word operational you wouldn't be continuously be dodging my question.
An airstrip with no fuel or munitions is not "operational"
If the US wanted to completely obliterate the entire thing they would have flown in some B-2's out of Whiteman AFB, not launched Tomahawk missiles.
How many future chemical attacks do you predict will be coming from this airfield?
So Bush brought down the towers on September 11th?
You are just dumb as aren't you.
A Tomahawk cruise missile with a conventional warhead is not capable of cratering a runway.
It was a reminder we could get Assad anytime we wanted to. You snowflakes are probably too young to remember the FB111's blowing up gadaffi's tent in the desert and damn near blowing his ass away in the process. Mother er cleaned up his act and quit ing with the US. He was already neutered when Hillary and Obama ed him over and turned Libya into a terrorist training camp.
Meh, beats being a blind shill like you.
Now all of a sudden this was a symbolic strike? Please
By Tillerson's own words they meant to destroy and make this airbase inoperable. Does it look inoperable to you when you have warplanes taking off from there and attacking some other place?
Even if this was a symbolic strike, they failed because what remains of Assad's forces seems to be unphased.
Nothing says welp, we just got bombed so let's launch a couple of planes so they can see how scared we are.![]()
60 million dollar waste of money for a "reminder"![]()
They base is still operational![]()
less than 24 hours planes are taking off
So you snowflakes would have preferred he use tactical nukes? They could have had some on board if they had wanted to.
I was very specific in only mentioning Vault 7.
Anyone who mentions Alex Jones and credibility in the same sentence needs to answer whether Bush brought down the towers on September 11th.
what are these planes that took off doing? who is reporting planes took off and are not linking back to SOHR? have the planes returned? why are the planes returning to a base with no fuel and munitions?
this makes zero sense. assad needs a reminder that we could get them anytime we wanted to? the only way to remind them was to waste $60m and make a fool of our military?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)