Reply With Quote
I'd say. I know he's short, but don't hand him the trophy.
Nate won?
I'd say. I know he's short, but don't hand him the trophy.
Man thats so typical
I knew i shoulda bet on the small guy
They should have given them a tie
Nate got 15 tries on that dunk off and AI had it in two
Miller - how much do you see in spud
Spud - a lot
Spud couldn't do any of the Nate is pulling off
No ! I had AI to win!
So let me get this straight... Dirk won when he shouldn't have made it to the finals, and now Nate won because one of the judges changed his mind after he had shown his score. I know it's supposed to be for fun, but that's kinda bull .
Yeah, it's ridiculous that a 5'6" guy who jumped completely over someone won itThis was a much more ridiculious result than the 3 point contest.
he totally didnt deserve that. his size won the contest. A.I. was a of a lot better though. oh well. it was an awesome contest. im not gunna get my panties in a wad over a meaningless event like some guys...
exactly
Miller - how much do you see in spud
Spud - a lot
Spud couldn't do any of the Nate is pulling off
nates more athletic
yes yes these are "meaningless events" and as much as i was rooting for nate to win the dunk compe ion, what they did to iggy was just wrong
Is he still trying to dunk?
oh no, that wasnt directed at you at all. i agree about the iggy thing too.
i guess my vbookies are reaping the disaster of that bet
3point Champ=Dirk*
Dunk Champ=Nate*
AI also had another 14 inches of height to work with.They should have given them a tie
Nate got 15 tries on that dunk off and AI had it in two
What's bull is Moses Malone giving him an 8 for the dunk over Spud Webb trying to protect his Philly boy.Nate won because one of the judges changed his mind after he had shown his score. I know it's supposed to be for fun, but that's kinda bull .
If Moses would have given him the right score on that dunk (10), it would have never gone to a dunk off.
EXACTLY
just because it's meaningless doesn't mean it doesn't have to be taken seriously or let stuff that shouldn't count, count. it defeats the purpose
If it's meaningless, then they shouldn't make it a contest. Just showcase some great dunks and not score them.
Lame. Iggy should've been the winner. If it takes you 10-20 tries to complete a dunk, you don't deserve to win. Period.
Yeah, it's ridiculous that I could have went and ran a mile while he was trying to attempt his first and third dunks in the finals
Wouldn't be another tie? I think there was only a 1 pt change. 10 changed to 9.
Agreed. Is there absolutely no penalty for that?
1999 NBA Champions= Spurs*
oh wait i am a spurs fan!
That is complete bull .
Andre Iguodala just got ing robbed. Now yes, Nate Robinson is a freak of nature at his height, you can't imagine what he could do if he were 6'6", but that was bull . Iggy got discriminated on because he is a foot taller, but what the , Nate had 14 attempts in his last dunk. Now no matter what you pull off, with that many attempts, I think your highest possible score should be a 45. If he had it on his first try, then you give him what he got.
Dunk contests are pretty damn tricky though, I mean Iggy could have saved his AI off the back of the backboard dunk for the end, but only 2 guys advance, so you have to do something to advance. But either way, that was complete bullcrap, Iggy tried something that has never even been tried before, it was just crazy.
Complete bull .
You simply can't win in a dunk contest after your 14th attempt, especially if you had to change it a little bit.
Once again, Iggy was robbed, and the judges are es.
Last year they counted a load against you if it took you more than 3 or so tries
Your Nate Robinson love is making you extremely biased.
AI deserved that win. PERIOD.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
