The Audacity of Hate

[Yonivore]

According to news sources, the words were his.

A+ it is.

[peewee's lovechild]

You're a ing dumbass

At least I know the difference between your and you're. You might as well learn it, before you start throughing around some grammar smack





Sure you are . . .





His stance in many issues make him what he is: a Republican.





You are a liberal. Get it out of the system. It will make you feel much better.






If the sky was green . . .





My point is it is stupid for somebody who votes Hillary to stay at home in the general election if your (not you're) woman does not win the primaries.

You said that is precisely what you will do, hence, you are stupid.

Yea, I got "you're" wrong.
I can admit when I'm wrong.

But, anyway, you say I'm a liberal.
Good.

How do you explain that I'm pro-life?
I also support tougher criminal penalties.
I also don't like the welfare system.

Are those things a liberal would support?

As for not voting because Hillary won't be a Presidential candidate . . . why the would I vote for someone I don't believe in?

Stupid is the person that does.

[Extra Stout]

Liberation Theology is a fringe movement with in the RCC.

Marxism and communism are clearly on the antipodes of what Catholicism is all about.

Obama's pastor is a Black Liberation Theologist. The TUCC website explicitly states that it is a church that teaches Black Liberation Theology. That is the basis for their Black Value System. They have taken LT and simply reapplied it to address the plight of urban blacks.

Obama's political ideology is a generalization of his church's teaching to cover all of America, rather than just blacks.

In the context of the United States, and expanded outside of the RCC, LT is not explicitly communist, and has given up violent revolution in favor of nonviolent political change.

[smeagol]

As for not voting because Hillary won't be a Presidential candidate . . . why the would I vote for someone I don't believe in?

Tell me what the insurmountable differences between Hillary and Obama are . . .

[smeagol]

Yea, I got "you're" wrong.
I can admit when I'm wrong.

The funny thing is you did it while running some grammar smack . . .

But don't listen to me, I'm always ing cows and sticking soccer balls up my ass . . .

[Extra Stout]

So, are you hinting that with Obama, our country would take on a more Social Reformist look?

I think he'd be another FDR.

[smeagol]

Obama's pastor is a Black Liberation Theologist. The TUCC website explicitly states that it is a church that teaches Black Liberation Theology. That is the basis for their Black Value System. They have taken LT and simply reapplied it to address the plight of urban blacks.

Obama's political ideology is a generalization of his church's teaching to cover all of America, rather than just blacks.

In the context of the United States, and expanded outside of the RCC, LT is not explicitly communist, and has given up violent revolution in favor of nonviolent political change.

Good to know.

Thanks

[smeagol]

I think he'd be another FDR.

Isn't that a good thing?

In 50 years, many highways, bridges and airports will be named after him.

[Extra Stout]

Isn't that a good thing?

In 50 years, many highways, bridges and airports will be named after him.

It's a good thing if you believe in liberal ideology, and a bad thing if you believe in conservative ideology.

[smeagol]

It's a good thing if you believe in liberal ideology, and a bad thing if you believe in conservative ideology.

Didn't FDR pull you guys out of the Great Depression?

[Extra Stout]

It's also remarkably ironic that a political movement in America which has so closely wedded itself to secularism as to attract just about everyone that hates religion... could ins ute the most overtly religious ideology in American history.

[Extra Stout]

Didn't FDR pull you guys out of the Great Depression?

World War II pulled the U.S. out of the Great Depression.

FDR gets credit for keeping the U.S. from suc bing to either a communist or fascist revolution in the 1930's. Both were attempted. The fascists almost suceeded. We take for granted that America is a stable capitalist democracy today, and don't understand how the Depression convinced a large number of Americans that both capitalism and democracy had failed. We are fortunate that FDR was able to steer the ship through that narrow strait.

However, we inherited the legacy of big government from him.

[Kermit]

I think he'd be another FDR.

It would take freefall into a derpression and a vast majority of Democrats in the House of Reps and the Senate to accomplish the social programs worthy of being compared to FDR. IMO, there are way to many veto points for our country to return to that kind of a social welfare state. I'm not saying he wouldn't try, but he would fail and fail spectacularly.

[Yonivore]

Isn't that a good thing?

In 50 years, many highways, bridges and airports will be named after him.

FDR was a dictator.

[Yonivore]

It would take freefall into a derpression and a vast majority of Democrats in the House of Reps and the Senate to accomplish the social programs worthy of being compared to FDR. IMO, there are way to many veto points for our country to return to that kind of a social welfare state. I'm not saying he wouldn't try, but he would fail and fail spectacularly.

And, thank God for that! Can I get an amen?

[boutons_]

I read an article yesterday that said the costs of the Iraq war will pre-empt any new president's plans for health care, and for just about any other discretionary spending, and for a lot of spending.

Spending the govt into crushing debt has always been the hidden agenda of Repugs/Norquist/AEI, so that the resuliting forced enconomizing, no matter which party held power, could be directed at govt expenditures, except for the untouchable, over-stuffed wasteful military.

dubya and head have totally ed their stewardship of the govt and will be leaving tons of on the WH lawn next 20 Jan.

socialism, never defined and exposed, is just another sound-bite myth the right wing uses to get knees to jerk.

[JoeChalupa]

FDR was a dictator.

Bush IS a dictator and some in here think he's a King.

[PixelPusher]

FDR was a dictator.

Nowadays, we called that the "Unitary Executive Theory".

The Republican subscription to this theory will likely expire in 2009.

[smeagol]

FDR was a dictator.

You have no idea what a dictator is

[Yonivore]

Bush IS a dictator and some in here think he's a King.

If he were a dictator, there'd be no dissenting on the Iraq war. He'd control the press and the Democrats.

He's just right.

[JoeChalupa]

You have no idea what a dictator is

Sure he does. He calls him President Bush.

[Yonivore]

You have no idea what a dictator is

I didn't say he wasn't a benevolent dictator but, FDR was, ideed, a dictator. And, had he stacked the Supreme Court the way he wanted, his coup would have been complete. But, most of what the government did, during his administration, was by executive fiat.

Look it up.

[Kermit]

FDR was a dictator.

I assume you're refering to the attempted packing of the Supreme Court? Lincoln did some shady things as well. Most Presidents have. Although I'm sure the court packing isn't the only thing you're alluding to.

[Yonivore]

Sure he does. He calls him President Bush.

Now, Joe's a guy that has no idea what is a dictator.

[JoeChalupa]

If he were a dictator, there'd be no dissenting on the Iraq war. He'd control the press and the Democrats.

He's just right.

Well according to Bush if there is any dissent they are a traitor and un-American. He's just plain wrong and thank God Almighty for term limits.