I never contradicted myself. That is all in your vivid imagination. You may have given examples where you would intervene in a situation long after your original statement of non-interference, but by that time it is far too late.
IMHO, if more people would get involved and report crimes and help the police in investigations it would cut down on unsolved crimes. It pisses me off when there is a shooting with dozens of witnesses yet "I didn't see anything" if what they'll say. It is when something happens to your family that all of a sudden we want everyone to cooperate.
It's hard to argue with a guy who changes what he says half the time.
For instance, way back in this thread you said "that maybe you'd help a child" if he/she was in a situation that called for help.
Now, though, it's "likely".
And not to mention your complete denial of the story about ng with some dude's insulin being true.
I ing quoted you. How in the did I imagine a qoute? You said it.
Those are your wordsIt depends on the situation. If I conclude that the odds are in my favor then I would get involved.
I never denied saying I wouldn't get involved. I also elaborated on that later yes. You however dropped your superhero act on everyone because you wanted to feel high and mighty to compensate for your lack of manhood and self esteem I suppose. You're a pompous egotistically asshole with some kind of complex about himself. Then you pussied out and dropped the line I quoted above. You're just the kind of guy that talks a big game but hides under the table ing himself until the bad guys leave.
I'm not buying any of your until you put the ing tights and cape on and be a real hero.
No...he's right, you're a chicken .
If you can't identify a troll job I'm sorry. Most people got the joke. You didn't get it and I'm sorry. Just not your type of humor.
We can play semantics thats fine. He'll just have to admit he was as vague as I was and bury his ing hero god complex because he elaborated as well. As a matter of fact to me its more about his line of bull because he refuses to admit he's all over himself. I'll however admit that my thoughts on the whole situation developed a bit as this thread has grown. I know he didn't read the whole thread, he just jumped in and mouthed off to feel big and powerful.
I got drilled pretty hard until a bunch of other people caught onto the thread and agreed. Then we get the chest bangers coming in to make their mark.
awww more drinks tossed from the gallery where all the little kiddies are hiding.
B2B breaks out the troll card.
I seriously could not believe that there were people who took that thread for face value. Have these people never roamed the internet before.B2B breaks out the troll card.
I said...What exactly am I contradicting with that statement?It depends on the situation. If I conclude that the odds are in my favor then I would get involved.
I don't need to mouth off to feel big and powerful. I already know that.
So which is it? Are you picking and chosing your battles...chicken theory, or are you going to play hero and jump in and save the day?
According to you people who mind their business are chicken ? So which line do you stand on.
I stated before in this thread that unless you have sufficient evidence that a guys has a gun, then go in there and break it up or try to. Seeing chick getting hit and standing back is a pussy-ass thing to do, if you know the guy doesn't have a gun. If the guy is showing that he he has a gun, I agree with tlong - at the point you're just going to excacerbate the situation (if you're not armed), so just call the cops.
But, maybe you're just a pussy who doesn't know how to throw a knockout punch to the head, B2B.
And if that's the case, maybe my logic doesn't apply to you.
Guns aren't the only things that kill people. Its not entirely about losing your life either. Lose an eye, the use of your hands and legs. I knew a guy in highschool that got jumped out in a field off Blanco road. They chased him from the theatre there. Beat him with a tiny little bat and he was veggie ever since. Anything can happen in a fight.
Your logic definately fails to apply to me. I'm not this worlds protector, I'm my own and my families. You guys are mostly full of and all talk anyway. Easy to talk big and you guys love sucking yourselves off.
wow. who needs soap operas
I was a little freaked out when I first heard the report because my doctor is a female internist in her early 40's who is in a clinic in the building right next door. I had to look up her address to make sure it was a different building. I was supposed to go over there that afternoon to pick up a prescription but was feeling too lazy so I decided to let it go til Monday.
It's so sad.
Unfortunately I do not have that ability.
Is B2B reaching his melting point? He's going for the gay smack now.
You're analogy doesn't apply to what I said. The hypothetical that we're talking about involved one dude, not several. If it's several or more, I don't expect anyone to be Bruce Lee.
You're distorting what I'm trying to say.
It wasn't a hypothetic associated with what you're saying. It was an example to showcase that damage can happen in more ways than just a gun.
You don't know where the knife, shank or two finger eye ball jab is hiding.
Anyways I'm bored with this thread. What should we argue about next?
Of course you are.
We can carry on if you like I really don't care.Of course you are.
Remember in high school when two teams' fans would shout out across a football field "We've got spirit, yes we do, we've got spirit...how 'bout you?!!"
And they'd go back and forth, and back and forth, and back and forth, and then it would melt down to "WE'VE GOT MORE....WE'VE GOT MORE...WE'VE GOT MORE!!"
And this would go on for what seemed like an eternity until it would finally dwindle down to just a select few people cheering.
And when one teams' fans would finally stop, the smattering few people left who actually cared would cheer and point and laugh while the other 98.5% of the people could really care less.
Personally I would start drinking heavily on about the first "spirit"...and I was on the field playing.
This is kinda like that.
I've been drinking since this thread started.
Well ya'll can argue forever (day 5 now) about what someone should/would/wouldn't do in such a situation, but I really think for most people, their reaction is just a reflex. It happens or doesn't, automatically. When they talk to civilians who run into burning buildings, or jump into rivers to save people, they always say they never thought about the danger, their safety, etc. They just did it. Granted there are a few glory hounds who want to be heroes, but it's not likely they would risk their lives. That would require someone to stop and ponder the situation, and there is rarely enough time to do that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote