Page 124 of 151 FirstFirst ... 2474114120121122123124125126127128134 ... LastLast
Results 3,076 to 3,100 of 3766
  1. #3076
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Barnes waived his trade kicker to come here as well….so off to a good start overall on that narrative I would say. Also, I think that if for example SA FO wanted to make a bigger splash you’d see most everyone (guys like Trae etc..) be all for that. It’s more of Spurs seemingly not wanting some of these guys than the opposite.
    I'd liken CP3 signing here and Barnes waiving his trade kicker to moves like signing Michael Finley, or Robert Horry or Damon Stoudamire or T-Mac. We've always been able to get those kind of FAs. We've never been able to land the big fish, despite guys claiming they'd love to. The biggest FA we've ever been able to land was LMA, and there was a Texas connection there.

    Maybe Wemby will change that, but we've heard all this chatter before. Until it happens, it's all just the same chatter we've always heard.

  2. #3077
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447

  3. #3078
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    westbrook being traded to Utah only to be bought out is becoming a tradition

  4. #3079
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Utah starting to utilize some of that cap space. They need to hold at least ~$15MM open if they plan on renegotiating and extending Lauri to the max. I think this takes them to around $33MM, so I don't think they're going to have any problems there.

    I might end up following the Jazz more closely than I really want to, just because I'm fascinated by this team building direction.

  5. #3080
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Utah starting to utilize some of that cap space. They need to hold at least ~$15MM open if they plan on renegotiating and extending Lauri to the max. I think this takes them to around $33MM, so I don't think they're going to have any problems there.

    I might end up following the Jazz more closely than I really want to, just because I'm fascinated by this team building direction.
    if they trade Markkanen instead of renegotiating i wonder if they take Lavine off Chicago for a pick. they cant absorb his entire salary but they wouldnt have to send too much salary back

  6. #3081
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Utah starting to utilize some of that cap space. They need to hold at least ~$15MM open if they plan on renegotiating and extending Lauri to the max. I think this takes them to around $33MM, so I don't think they're going to have any problems there.

    I might end up following the Jazz more closely than I really want to, just because I'm fascinated by this team building direction.
    Let us know if they have one.

  7. #3082
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Let us know if they have one.
    Right now the direction seems to be: "aimlessly driving America's interstate system, collecting as many roadside souvenirs as they find interesting, not sure where they are going... maybe they'll know it when the find it?"

  8. #3083
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    995
    if they trade Markkanen instead of renegotiating i wonder if they take Lavine off Chicago for a pick. they cant absorb his entire salary but they wouldnt have to send too much salary back
    I hope not. A healthy, I know don't laugh, Lavine on the Bulls can only help Spurs' pick possibly conveying next yr as a 1st rounder.

  9. #3084
    Mostly good takes Dverde's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    4,162
    Clippers having to give up a pick to rid themselves of Westbrook

  10. #3085
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Clippers having to give up a pick to rid themselves of Westbrook
    yes and no. they are giving Dunn 5/17, more then westbrook was making

  11. #3086
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    995
    Clippers having to give up a pick to rid themselves of Westbrook
    I mean, Utah would probably still have the better pick depending on the yr so doubt they'd even swap.

  12. #3087
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    if they trade Markkanen instead of renegotiating i wonder if they take Lavine off Chicago for a pick. they cant absorb his entire salary but they wouldnt have to send too much salary back
    The way they've kept an excess of cap space open COULD seem to indicate that they want to leave as many teams in the mix as possible for a possible trade for Lauri, Sexton or Clarkson. They accomplish this by leaving the space open to absorb salary far in excess of what they are sending out - so a team already flirting with the 1st or 2nd apron can not only match salary but create the space under the apron(s) they need in order to resign Lauri (doesn't apply as much to Sexton or Clarkson - they each have two years left). I'm sure Utah would happily accept a little extra draft compensation on top of the base deal to absorb some contracts the acquiring team needs to shed.

    For us, it could mean that sending Keldon and Collins could be something Utah is amenable to (though at this point I'm fairly confident we're out of the picture).

    For whatever reason, it seems like some teams are actually interested in Lavine, so I'm not sure Utah is going to be the right team for him... it kind of dead ends him in a weird place. I'm also thinking that Chicago doesn't really need to dump Lavine in order to tank. It's not like he's going to play that much anyway. It's kind of like having Ben Simmons on your team... just a god awful expensive guy on your team who never plays.

  13. #3088
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Did a little more reading on some Jazz forums today, and the general consensus seems to be something that us Spurs fans can relate to: frustration that the FO seemingly has yet to pick a direction. It seemed like they were primed to tank for Wemby, but Hardy and Lauri caught them off-guard and pulled them up into treadmill land.

    One commenter said what I've essentially been saying: Ainge is more concerned with ing over teams over than he is with building up the Jazz. Another commenter even went as far to say that Ainge is holding the team back from a real rebuild with his desire to squeeze every last drop from a Lauri trade.

    There's also some long-lasting s shock among that fan base... the best draft pick they ever had was on Dominique Wilkins, who refused to play for them and got traded for some guys that combined played for 4 seasons and then were out of the league. One of their next highest ever picks was used on Enes Kanter... so the allure of high draft picks doesn't evoke the memories and excitement that we get here in San Antonio with DRob, Sean, Timmy, Wemby and now Castle.

    Even Jazz fans seem to agree that sitting pat with Lauri is the least logical move for the Jazz at this point. Apparently fans feel like the team made real efforts to get OG, Mikal, PG13 and Tobias Harris and failed at them all. Without a move like that, then you're stuck in no man's land with Lauri. Might as well get the best deal you can and start the rebuild in earnest.

    It was an interesting, and rather bleak, trip into the minds of Jazz fans. The only levity came when a Piston's fan chimed in with "trust me, hard tanking sometimes ain't all that great either". Maybe I'll go down a Pistons rabbit hole next... this is a great way to feel a lot better about what we're doing.

  14. #3089
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    It was an interesting, and rather bleak, trip into the minds of Jazz fans.
    They're kind of victims of never wanting to tank.
    The only franchise in the league that never lost 60 games.
    In 20 years they had just one season with less than 36 wins up until this one, but they had just 5 seasons with 50+ wins.
    One conference finals and just 11/20 made playoffs.

    The definition of a treadmill franchise.

    Maybe I'll go down a Pistons rabbit hole next... this is a great way to feel a lot better about what we're doing.
    Pistons and some other franchises are all the way on the other end of the spectrum. Too much tanking just ruins the culture and it's really hard to bring it back.
    Yeah, they were really unlucky in the lottery over the past years, but still.

    We can feel better about us, but the truth is that we've been in the lottery for 5 straight years, second longest streak behind the Pistons and if we didn't win the jackpot with 14% odds, we'd still be a top3 worst team in the league with at least two more years of tanking ahead of us.

  15. #3090
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Did a little more reading on some Jazz forums today, and the general consensus seems to be something that us Spurs fans can relate to: frustration that the FO seemingly has yet to pick a direction. It seemed like they were primed to tank for Wemby, but Hardy and Lauri caught them off-guard and pulled them up into treadmill land.

    One commenter said what I've essentially been saying: Ainge is more concerned with ing over teams over than he is with building up the Jazz. Another commenter even went as far to say that Ainge is holding the team back from a real rebuild with his desire to squeeze every last drop from a Lauri trade.

    There's also some long-lasting s shock among that fan base... the best draft pick they ever had was on Dominique Wilkins, who refused to play for them and got traded for some guys that combined played for 4 seasons and then were out of the league. One of their next highest ever picks was used on Enes Kanter... so the allure of high draft picks doesn't evoke the memories and excitement that we get here in San Antonio with DRob, Sean, Timmy, Wemby and now Castle.

    Even Jazz fans seem to agree that sitting pat with Lauri is the least logical move for the Jazz at this point. Apparently fans feel like the team made real efforts to get OG, Mikal, PG13 and Tobias Harris and failed at them all. Without a move like that, then you're stuck in no man's land with Lauri. Might as well get the best deal you can and start the rebuild in earnest.

    It was an interesting, and rather bleak, trip into the minds of Jazz fans. The only levity came when a Piston's fan chimed in with "trust me, hard tanking sometimes ain't all that great either". Maybe I'll go down a Pistons rabbit hole next... this is a great way to feel a lot better about what we're doing.
    This suggests why good relationships with other GMs and franchises helps. The Spurs have good relationships with Toronto and Miami, off the top of my head, and probably pretty good with NOP. These are franchises we've made trades with lately, and more than once. Miami and San Antonio have strong relationships and we've helped them cut salary. Toronto and the Spurs have made more than one trade.

    Another relationship popped back up with the DeRozan trade with Chicago. I've never heard about intimate appreciation between CHI and SAS the way we have Masai or Riley and our FO, but no one really felt they got screwed with the DDR trade to the Bulls. It's what they wanted, it was fair, and no hard feelings.

    A good relationship probably depends on not trying to screw the other guy over; you want both parties to come away with something they needed, and that history probably helped the Spurs grease the wheels between Sacramento and Chicago, both of whom got what they wanted - Sacto getting a boost of a player they wanted, Chicago not losing him for nothing. The Spurs got a free Harrison Barnes out of thin air.

    That's... not something I think Ainge can engineer. As far as I know, he doesn't have those relationships, and Lacob's recent comments are peculiar for how aggressive they were in pointing out a problem. Ainge has a reputation for trying to strong arm and win every deal, when mutual benefit is what keeps these channels open.

  16. #3091
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    They're kind of victims of never wanting to tank.
    The only franchise in the league that never lost 60 games.
    In 20 years they had just one season with less than 36 wins up until this one, but they had just 5 seasons with 50+ wins.
    One conference finals and just 11/20 made playoffs.

    The definition of a treadmill franchise.



    Pistons and some other franchises are all the way on the other end of the spectrum. Too much tanking just ruins the culture and it's really hard to bring it back.
    Yeah, they were really unlucky in the lottery over the past years, but still.

    We can feel better about us, but the truth is that we've been in the lottery for 5 straight years, second longest streak behind the Pistons and if we didn't win the jackpot with 14% odds, we'd still be a top3 worst team in the league with at least two more years of tanking ahead of us.
    Thanks for reminding me of this - there is definitely some degree of pride in the fact that apparently the Jazz have the best-worst record in league history (meaning, if you ranked all franchise's worst season in history, the Jazz have the best one). Weird thing to be proud of, but when you're Utah Jazz I guess every milestone counts.

  17. #3092
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    This suggests why good relationships with other GMs and franchises helps. The Spurs have good relationships with Toronto and Miami, off the top of my head, and probably pretty good with NOP. These are franchises we've made trades with lately, and more than once. Miami and San Antonio have strong relationships and we've helped them cut salary. Toronto and the Spurs have made more than one trade.

    Another relationship popped back up with the DeRozan trade with Chicago. I've never heard about intimate appreciation between CHI and SAS the way we have Masai or Riley and our FO, but no one really felt they got screwed with the DDR trade to the Bulls. It's what they wanted, it was fair, and no hard feelings.

    A good relationship probably depends on not trying to screw the other guy over; you want both parties to come away with something they needed, and that history probably helped the Spurs grease the wheels between Sacramento and Chicago, both of whom got what they wanted - Sacto getting a boost of a player they wanted, Chicago not losing him for nothing. The Spurs got a free Harrison Barnes out of thin air.

    That's... not something I think Ainge can engineer. As far as I know, he doesn't have those relationships, and Lacob's recent comments are peculiar for how aggressive they were in pointing out a problem. Ainge has a reputation for trying to strong arm and win every deal, when mutual benefit is what keeps these channels open.
    Indeed (and it also makes me wonder about the Spurs relationship with other folks where they have more direct connections, like OKC and BKN. We haven't really done business with them, but I would imagine there are good vibes from Presti and Marks). I'd also add MIN to the list of teams we seem to have good relations with, having made draft day trades with them in consecutive years.

    In the end, I think it's a stark reminder that there is a difference between winning battles and winning wars. Post-Boston Ainge (and maybe even late-Boston Ainge) is winning battles (individual trades) while not winning the war (building a winning team). The current Boston team has foundations built by Ainge, that come mostly from taking advantage of a Nets team who wanted to go all in with aging stars, but it was Stephens who put all the necessary finishing touches on. Utah Ainge is winning battles, but has nothing to show for it.

    There is also a lessen in there for the Spurs. We are also winning battles without yet having made tangible progress towards winning the war, but I feel like we've won battles in the way that *should* better allow us to ultimately win the war. But we've actually yet to turn that corner, so we'll see.

    Matt Tynan previously stated that he felt the Spurs were fighting against a "Spurs tax" - basically that having Wemby means that we have to pay extra because teams don't want to help us create a monster they cannot contain. Whether that is true or not, I don't know, but it seems like our FO has done it's part to try and mitigate that through good relationship building.

    This has been me, complimenting our FO. Anything is possible.

  18. #3093
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447

  19. #3094
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Ha. The Spurs traded Dan's rights as a "touch" in the DeMarre Carroll trade. Not that he amounted to much, but it's another casualty of that disastrous off-season.

  20. #3095
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Man i haven’t heard that Dangubich name in a while.

  21. #3096
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Ziaire seemed too delicate for the the Grit n Grind culture there.

  22. #3097
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Also, back to Utah and LM, he seems like the White Knight that Utah fans seem to pine for, and the team seeks out, so I have to guess he wants out but isn't saying it? If so, perhaps he should start saying it to get things moving.

  23. #3098
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    458
    Also, back to Utah and LM, he seems like the White Knight that Utah fans seem to pine for, and the team seeks out, so I have to guess he wants out but isn't saying it? If so, perhaps he should start saying it to get things moving.
    I believe LM already told Utah that he wants to be traded and will not sign extension.

    On the other hand, even if Lauri wants to stay, Utah would still want to trade him in order to tank hard.

    For now, Utah is still pretending that they don't want to trade him. But, pretty soon, then cannot pretend anymore.

    It will happen before season starts. August 6th will be very clear and trade talks will get moving again.

  24. #3099
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447

  25. #3100
    Veteran cutewizard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    11,111
    Guys

    Have you heard Cam Johnson moves?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •