Reply With Quote
Apparently the FBI wasn't.
motivated reasoners like you and TSA will torture the evidence until it gives you the result you started with, or just lie about the evidence.
Apparently the FBI wasn't.
what's your conspiracy theory about this?
Why would the FBI hide this FD-1023 from IRS investigators and congress?
dunno, sounds like that should maybe be investigated, if in fact that's what happened. what's your hypothesis?
If in fact that's what happened?That is exactly what happened. Other than protecting Joe Biden, can you think of any other reason the FBI would hide this FD-1023 from IRS investigators and congress?
Still a nothing burger.
You shot your wad posting pics.
that's why you have an investigation, but it's hardly surprising that thought ceases for you the moment the first thing pops into your head.If in fact that's what happened?
lol forgone conclusions
There was an investigation. This FD-1023 was hidden from IRS investigators by the FBI. Why would the FBI hide the testimony from one of their most trusted confidential human sources?
Not sure. Maybe they couldn't find it.
What's your forgone conclusion?
there's as much evidence for your forgone conclusion as my guess
"Maybe they couldn't find it"
lol
another rabbit hole!
hahahahahahaha!
you got nothing. just freewheeling speculation."Maybe they couldn't find it"
you got...maybe they couldn't find it.
I don't pretend to know in advance, like you.you got...maybe they couldn't find it.
More child sex shop pizza theories?you got...maybe they couldn't find it.
Trump's DOJ had this info and did nothing with it. Barr didn't think the source was credible.
What's your conspiracy theory for that, TSA?
Is it conspiracies all the down?
Are you just making up about Barr or are you just misinformed? It's one or the other because Barr never said that. Barr sent the FD-1023 to be investigated by Weiss. Weiss hid the FD-1023 (or maybe lost it
"Nowhere in the transcripts did the IRS whistleblowers discuss the June 30, 2020, FD-1023 report that summarized a “highly credible” confidential human source’s claims that the owner of Burisma said Hunter and Joe Biden coerced him into paying them each $5 million in bribes.
The whistleblowers made clear in supplemental statements provided to the House Ways and Means Committee why that was: because the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office did not inform them of the existence or content of the FD-1023. In fact, the June 12, 2023, affidavit that IRS Criminal Supervisory Special Agent Gary Shapley signed establishes the whistleblowers only realized the FD-1023 had been held back after The Federalist exclusively reported two weeks ago that former Attorney General William Barr said he had sent the CHS’s reporting to Delaware for further investigation.
“Most recently, former Attorney General Bill Barr provided an interview in which he stated that information provided by a Confidential Human Source (‘CHS’) concerning an alleged bribery scheme by President Joe Biden was received through the Pittsburgh [U.S. Attorney Office] and was determined it was not likely to have been disinformation,” Shapley said in his affidavit. Barr noted the FD-1023 “was provided to the ongoing investigation in Delaware to follow up on and to check out,” the affidavit continued.
But according to the IRS whistleblower, the CHS information Barr referenced was never provided to Shapley, nor to any of the IRS agents acting under his supervision, nor to the FBI agents working with the IRS investigators.
Shapley added that he and other IRS criminal investigators had asked to participate in the briefings the Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney’s Office was providing Delaware, but their requests were denied. Had they participated in those briefings, Shapley stressed, they would have undertaken proper investigative steps to determine the veracity of the CHS’s claims. According to Shapley’s affidavit, however, because the information was never provided to the investigators, the agents involved took no steps to determine if the CHS’s allegations could be substantiated.
The second whistleblower, Shapley’s anonymous subordinate and the case agent on the Hunter Biden tax investigation, provided a similar statement, albeit via a letter from his attorney.
Since the second whistleblower’s testimony, the letter explained, multiple news articles reported on the existence of the June 2020 FD-1023 report of a CHS’s bribery allegations, as well as Barr’s statement that he had sent that information to Delaware for further investigation. However, according to the case agent’s attorney, “he has never seen this FBI Form 1023” and “does not recall ever hearing about this information being turned over in any meetings with the prosecution team in Delaware.”
The whistleblowers’ claims that they did not see the FD-1023 and that the investigating IRS and FBI agents with whom they worked also do not recall ever learning of the information is huge because these agents were essentially the only ones conducting any semblance of an investigation into Hunter Biden. It is inconceivable that this evidence would be withheld from the investigating agents.
Further, Shapley’s investigative team was precisely the group to investigate the allegations contained in the FD-1023, as his group is “known as the International Tax and Financial Crimes group,” and consists of “12 elite agents who were selected based on their experience and performance in the area of complex high-dollar international tax investigations.”
The question remains who within the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office withheld the FD-1023 from Shapley and his team when Barr had directed that the CHS’s reporting be sent there for further investigation. Further, Barr has recently confirmed the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office was briefed on the detailed allegations contained in the FD-1023, following then-U.S. Attorney Scott Brady’s conclusion that the CHS’s reporting did not appear to be misinformation."
https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/23...investigation/
Have fun as the conspira tries to baffle you with bull .
YawnAre you just making up about Barr or are you just misinformed? It's one or the other because Barr never said that. Barr sent the FD-1023 to be investigated by Weiss. Weiss hid the FD-1023 (or maybe lost it
"Nowhere in the transcripts did the IRS whistleblowers discuss the June 30, 2020, FD-1023 report that summarized a “highly credible” confidential human source’s claims that the owner of Burisma said Hunter and Joe Biden coerced him into paying them each $5 million in bribes.
The whistleblowers made clear in supplemental statements provided to the House Ways and Means Committee why that was: because the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office did not inform them of the existence or content of the FD-1023. In fact, the June 12, 2023, affidavit that IRS Criminal Supervisory Special Agent Gary Shapley signed establishes the whistleblowers only realized the FD-1023 had been held back after The Federalist exclusively reported two weeks ago that former Attorney General William Barr said he had sent the CHS’s reporting to Delaware for further investigation.
“Most recently, former Attorney General Bill Barr provided an interview in which he stated that information provided by a Confidential Human Source (‘CHS’) concerning an alleged bribery scheme by President Joe Biden was received through the Pittsburgh [U.S. Attorney Office] and was determined it was not likely to have been disinformation,” Shapley said in his affidavit. Barr noted the FD-1023 “was provided to the ongoing investigation in Delaware to follow up on and to check out,” the affidavit continued.
But according to the IRS whistleblower, the CHS information Barr referenced was never provided to Shapley, nor to any of the IRS agents acting under his supervision, nor to the FBI agents working with the IRS investigators.
Shapley added that he and other IRS criminal investigators had asked to participate in the briefings the Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney’s Office was providing Delaware, but their requests were denied. Had they participated in those briefings, Shapley stressed, they would have undertaken proper investigative steps to determine the veracity of the CHS’s claims. According to Shapley’s affidavit, however, because the information was never provided to the investigators, the agents involved took no steps to determine if the CHS’s allegations could be substantiated.
The second whistleblower, Shapley’s anonymous subordinate and the case agent on the Hunter Biden tax investigation, provided a similar statement, albeit via a letter from his attorney.
Since the second whistleblower’s testimony, the letter explained, multiple news articles reported on the existence of the June 2020 FD-1023 report of a CHS’s bribery allegations, as well as Barr’s statement that he had sent that information to Delaware for further investigation. However, according to the case agent’s attorney, “he has never seen this FBI Form 1023” and “does not recall ever hearing about this information being turned over in any meetings with the prosecution team in Delaware.”
The whistleblowers’ claims that they did not see the FD-1023 and that the investigating IRS and FBI agents with whom they worked also do not recall ever learning of the information is huge because these agents were essentially the only ones conducting any semblance of an investigation into Hunter Biden. It is inconceivable that this evidence would be withheld from the investigating agents.
Further, Shapley’s investigative team was precisely the group to investigate the allegations contained in the FD-1023, as his group is “known as the International Tax and Financial Crimes group,” and consists of “12 elite agents who were selected based on their experience and performance in the area of complex high-dollar international tax investigations.”
The question remains who within the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office withheld the FD-1023 from Shapley and his team when Barr had directed that the CHS’s reporting be sent there for further investigation. Further, Barr has recently confirmed the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office was briefed on the detailed allegations contained in the FD-1023, following then-U.S. Attorney Scott Brady’s conclusion that the CHS’s reporting did not appear to be misinformation."
https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/23...investigation/
The irony of you bringing up bull and while quoting actual bull
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
