Trump losing in federal district court 90% of the time
Nowhere else does our "catch me if you can" executive branch face such adversity
picking on DACA recipients is now a thing
this one got released by a judge for being improperly detained
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/10...-court-ruling/U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone, a Bush appointee in El Paso, said in her ruling that Santiago’s detainment “deprives her of her cons utional right to procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Cons ution.”
The Trump administration “did not present any evidence indicating that Santiago has endangered anyone during her twenty years at liberty, including her thirteen years under DACA. Tellingly, they have failed to even articulate an individualized reason for which she should be detained,” Cardone wrote.
Trump losing in federal district court 90% of the time
Nowhere else does our "catch me if you can" executive branch face such adversity
It might not be long before Trump will undertake to make the judges and the law illegal, probably by declaring a bull emergency for the 1000th time in 9 months
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-04-2025 at 06:22 PM. Reason: might not
jUdGeZ aR tErRorIst
![]()
(when you're calling local police, prosecutors and judges terrorists you're losing the thread)
really macabre case
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...989081.9.0.pdf
![]()
On these facts, Respondents’ prolonged failure to provide Pe ioner with formal notice of the reasons for his detention cannot be justified as a “reasonable period of time” under Section 287.3(d). It is therefore likely that Pe ioner’s due process rights are being violated. Considering the absence of factual support for Pe ioner’s arrest, the lack of justification for his continued detention, and the length of time he has been held without process, the Court concludes that Pe ioner is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that his detention lacks statutory authority and violates the Cons ution. Accordingly, the “likelihood of success” factor weighs in Pe ioner’s favor and supports granting the requested temporary restraining order.
The Supreme Court “has repeatedly held that the basis for injunctive relief in the federal courts has always been irreparable injury and the inadequacy of legal remedies.” Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305, 312 (1982) (collecting cases). Injunctive relief “should be ‘no more burdensome to the defendant than necessary to provide complete relief to the plaintiffs before the court.’” E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 993 F.3d 640, 680 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting U. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 908 F.3d 476, 511 (9th Cir. 2018)). “Where relief can be structured on an individual basis, it must be narrowly tailored to remedy the specific harm shown.” Id. (citation omitted).
Pe ioner seeks a temporary restraining order directing Respondents to “release Pe ioner and remove all restraints on his liberty—including the presence of guards or other security personnel in or near his hospital room at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.” Doc. # 2 at 44–45. The Court finds that the requested relief is appropriately limited and tailored to address the specific harm demonstrated.
To be clear, Respondents must not remove Pe ioner from the hospital, cause his discharge before his medical team deems it medically appropriate, or require his in-person appearance before an immigration officer prior to his discharge from the hospital. Rather, the Court orders that guards be withdrawn from Pe ioner’s hospital room, that restrictions on his activities be lifted (including his ability to make telephone calls to family and friends and to confer confidentially with counsel outside the presence of ICE agents), and that any physical restraints, such as handcuffs, be removed.
ICE broke his leg, admitted him to a hospital under a pseudonym and chained him to a hospital bed under 24/7 private armed guard. They told the man nothing, denied him access to a lawyer, and took no steps to put him in the removal system for over five weeks.
The guards alone cost $400,000
In principle this could happen to anyone -- if immigrants don't have due process, no one else does either
So are you against ICE or for ICE?
I am against a secret police force that abducts US citizens without cause.
Why do you want to be abducted by secret police?
ICE has only been around for 22 years. It's not some sacred cow.
I'd be fine if it were reorganized out of existence.
waging war against the US violates the treason clause of the US Cons ution; I think it's fair to say any US agency participating in that treason deserves to face the consequences
Deport all their sorry asses!
that's basically an admission
CNN: That's not exactly a no, Stephen. Can you just unequivocally say that the immigration policy is not designed to profile people?
STEPHEN MILLER: No, and it's a dumb question
People are saying this is the best government tweet ever
when you've got no good news to report about your president
I'd love to see where he's getting his made up stats from but that's not how team Trump rolls.
Your alt right Facebook friends? I'd be surprised if they weren't saying that.
Someone will die soon and you guys will high five.
your government posting just to give you internet jollies should give you pause
are you getting hazed by the hype, Snake Boy?
![]()
if we skimp on due process, in principle it could happen to you. it already could have.
the number of US citizens deported in the last 15 years is in the 1000s, I think
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-07-2025 at 02:41 AM.
the whole of government emphasis on mass deportation detracts from prosecuting crimes
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...![]()
how long were they "citizens" and we do have an apparatus in place to denaturalize and deport so... are we talking US lineage like in my family or that of a third world ter coming over on a H1-B and importing the rest of their incestuous re ed brethren?
Hour Ago
koriwhat
LMAO
This message is hidden because koriwhat is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
I'm guessing kori badly wants the jobs that they're taking. Maybe he'll get a raise in salary by picking tomatoes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)