1. #31751
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Good evening Moscow!!!!!


  2. #31752
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Da


  3. #31753
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022







    Suck-egg-mule.

  4. #31754
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    My point is this war needs to wind down and that clearly there are others in the West who think territorial losses for Ukraine are on the table in order to do so.

    Not hard to understand.

    Sadly, some (perhaps you) just want to plow endless resources into this war though despite the diminishing returns.



  5. #31755
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313

  6. #31756
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022

    "Make sure you're right........."
































































































    "Then give RG & Effy a 12 incher-a-piece."

  7. #31757
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    Endless resources... Im sorry thats just not the case.
    There are some who subscribe to the "whatever it takes" model in which we give Ukraine all the financial and military aid it needs to completely vanquish Russia from Ukraine. I can't imagine what that is going to cost, but don't forget the new G7 framework for security guarantees that is being worked on -- what is being proposed includes a possible Israel style military aid. Basically setting us up for endless amounts of aid in the billions of dollars even after the war is over if this is actually agreed upon.

  8. #31758
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    WAPO: U.S. intelligence says Ukraine will fail to meet offensive’s key goal.

    Thwarted by minefields, Ukrainian forces won’t reach the southeastern city of Melitopol, a vital Russian transit hub, according to a U.S. intelligence assessment.


    The U.S. intelligence community assesses that Ukraine’s counteroffensive will fail to reach the key southeastern city of Melitopol, people familiar with the classified forecast told The Washington Post, a finding that, should it prove correct, would mean Kyiv won’t fulfill its principal objective of severing Russia’s land bridge to Crimea in this year’s push.

    The grim assessment is based on Russia’s brutal proficiency in defending occupied territory through a phalanx of minefields and trenches, and is likely to prompt finger pointing inside Kyiv and Western capitals about why a counteroffensive that saw tens of billions of dollars of Western weapons and military equipment fell short of its goals.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ive-melitopol/

  9. #31759
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    There are some who subscribe to the "whatever it takes" model in which we give Ukraine all the financial and military aid it needs to completely vanquish Russia from Ukraine. I can't imagine what that is going to cost, but don't forget the new G7 framework for security guarantees that is being worked on -- what is being proposed includes a possible Israel style military aid. Basically setting us up for endless amounts of aid in the billions of dollars even after the war is over if this is actually agreed upon.
    Well, that is “whatever it takes” means, so yes, whatever it takes.

  10. #31760
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    My point is this war needs to wind down and that clearly there are others in the West who think territorial losses for Ukraine are on the table in order to do so.

    Not hard to understand.

    Sadly, some (perhaps you) just want to plow endless resources into this war though despite the diminishing returns.
    You want the war to wind down. Myself and others want the Russians to lose.

    I am familiar with federal spending being in the trillions. You remind me of the people whinging about foreign aid.

  11. #31761
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    WAPO: U.S. intelligence says Ukraine will fail to meet offensive’s key goal.

    Thwarted by minefields, Ukrainian forces won’t reach the southeastern city of Melitopol, a vital Russian transit hub, according to a U.S. intelligence assessment.




    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ive-melitopol/
    This has been in the zeitgeist for over a month. That being said they have been making gains.

  12. #31762
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    You want the war to wind down. Myself and others want the Russians to lose.

    I am familiar with federal spending being in the trillions. You remind me of the people whinging about foreign aid.
    I think most Americans want Russia to lose (including myself) but we're not all willing to pay "whatever it takes".

  13. #31763
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    I think most Americans want Russia to lose (including myself) but we're not all willing to pay "whatever it takes".
    What it has taken to this point is hardly an issue given the denominator. Why are you complaining?

  14. #31764
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    What it has taken to this point is hardly an issue given the denominator. Why are you complaining?
    Explain what you mean by "given the denominator". I hope it's not as much of a fallacy as I think it may be.

  15. #31765
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022

  16. #31766
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022
    Most Americans want peace. A small group wants Russia to lose because of their TDS.

  17. #31767
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Explain what you mean by "given the denominator". I hope it's not as much of a fallacy as I think it may be.
    Federal expenditures. You are trying to make this a fiscal issue so like with foreign aid I am putting it into perspective.

    It was $5.3 trillion last year. We have given Ukraine $110b in ~18 months.

  18. #31768
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    9,155
    My point is this war needs to wind down and that clearly there are others in the West who think territorial losses for Ukraine are on the table in order to do so.

    Not hard to understand.

    Sadly, some (perhaps you) just want to plow endless resources into this war though despite the diminishing returns.
    You live under delusion peddled by Russian that Ukraine only fights this war because they get support from west and because they are ordered so by the west (denying Ukrainians their agency and freedom of action). Both of these are blatantly false. The Ukrainians fought back since 2014, and have done so long before they had any support or interest for help from the west. If NATO ended support for Ukraine, this would not end the war, it would only make it more bloody and brutal especially for Ukrainian civilians. Secondly the defense of Ukraine (which cannot be achieved without defeating Russia) has a big support among the Ukrainian population. If Zelensky came out today and ordered his troops to lay down the arms, he would be removed and replaced by Ukrainian people. He's not Putin, Ukraine is a democracy.

    So the option is not "keep supporting and war" or "stop supporting and peace", it's "keep supporting and shorter war" or "stop supporting and longer and even bloodier war". You would would have to be a particularly cruel and selfish person to root for the second option.

    But even putting aside moral arguments, there are political and economical reasons to support Ukraine in their fight against aggressor:
    1. Shorter war is better for everyone, especially for us in the west since we want to live in peace, freedom and prosperity, and war is not good for business and prosperity
    2. Make no mistake this is an ideological war. A successful by tyranny against freedom, puts more free countries at risk and that will mean more wars, which is again bad for business. We are already seeing this in Africa with supporters of Russia's a "new world order".
    3. Since the war will continue with or without west's support it's better to be waged with west's input, ensuring it does not escalate out of control. Without west's support you would see a more nationalistic and brutal regime in charge of Ukraine, one financed by less savoury methods. No one in Europe wants a failed state led by hardcore nationalists at their border, one Russia is more than enough.
    4. Signaling you are willing to finance the war indefinitely with endless resources demoralizes Russia and their supporters and brings them quicker to negotiating table and thus brings us closer to peace.

    As for the costs, i will be brief since i don't have time right now:
    1. Old stuff costs to maintain, giving it away saves money.
    2. New stuff needs to be tested, that saves you money by not buying and investing in something that doesn't work
    3. War is bad for business, the quicker the victory the quicker we can get back to business
    4. Peace dividend: keeping a uncertain "frozen" conflict or stalemate costs a lot, consider the cost of armies in cold war time, versus after the defeat of USSR (USA spent over 9% of GDP at the height of cold war, now it's less than 4%), or consider the cost for USA in Korea (an unresolved, frozen war). The quicker and more decisive the win against one of the most destabilizing force in the world, the quicker we can cut our defensive spending all over the west.

    For democracies nothing will ever be as cheap as victory against Russia, the sooner the better.

    And that is all completely ignoring the moral and humanitarian aspect, pure "real politic" and heartless calculation of what is better for us.

    So yeah, whatever it takes and Putin.

  19. #31769
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,412
    My point is this war needs to wind down and that clearly there are others in the West who think territorial losses for Ukraine are on the table in order to do so.

    Not hard to understand.

    Sadly, some (perhaps you) just want to plow endless resources into this war though despite the diminishing returns.
    The returns are not diminishing. Russia's military power is diminishing.

  20. #31770
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Whatever it takes.


  21. #31771
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Dasvidaniya


  22. #31772
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    9,155

  23. #31773
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195







    Back-end-of-mule.

  24. #31774
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,962
    WAPO: U.S. intelligence says Ukraine will fail to meet offensive’s key goal.

    Thwarted by minefields, Ukrainian forces won’t reach the southeastern city of Melitopol, a vital Russian transit hub, according to a U.S. intelligence assessment.




    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ive-melitopol/
    Even more significant in my mind is the that the US, Ukraine's main supporter, has leaked this information to the DC newspaper of record. US support for maximalist outcomes seems to be cracking. I bet Zelensky is pissed.

  25. #31775
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195
    Even more significant in my mind is the that the US, Ukraine's main supporter, has leaked this information to the DC newspaper of record. US support for maximalist outcomes seems to be cracking. I bet Zelensky is pissed.
    ...good, he's nothing more than a Nazi loving .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •