Repug party is polluted with deranged heads who will say anything that their deranged base wants to hear, will believe
Ron Johnson implodes while accusing Joe Biden of being 'comprised' and a human sex trafficker
https://www.alternet.org/2022/07/ron...den-comprised/
‘Separate but equal’ returns to Tennessee with judges’ ruling against Jewish couple
In January 2022, Elizabeth and Gabriel Rutan-Ram sued the Tennessee Department of Children’s Services
after Holston United Methodist Home for Children refused to help them with the state-funded foster training services required by the state.
The reason Holston United Methodist Home for Children refused to help them was because Elizabeth and Gabriel are Jewish.
On June 27, 2022, a three judge panel in a Tennessee court rejected their lawsuit on the grounds that:
"Because the Couple has received the very services they claim they were previously denied,
the Panel Majority adopts the Defendants' analysis and concludes that any issue related to denial of services is not capable of the prospective relief the Plaintiffs seek and is now moot.”
because the Rutan-Rams were—after losing out on a foster child opportunity—finally able to foster a child,
there was not enough “harm” done.
They subsequently argue that just
because the defendants were denied state-funded services because they were Jewish isn’t a sign of “stigmatic injury.”
How?
Because technically the law doesn’t consider Jewish people less than.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/202...-Jewish-couple
ing lawyers, spew out any old
UFO Whistleblowers Would Get Immunity Under New Amendment
In an effort to protect those with information about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and increase the influx of reports about them, Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wisc) has introduced (PDF) an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act. "The amendment would establish a process within the government for reporting UAPs and provide whistleblower-like protections," Gallagher's spokesman Jordan Dunn told The War Zone Thursday morning. For a mul ude of reasons, U.S. troops and government contractors have traditionally been reluctant to come forward with information about these incidents, regardless of their validity. Beyond that, there have also been long-standing allegations that the government and defense contractors could be hiding previous UFO-related programs and evidence. This would allow those with information to come forward without retribution. Some have even posited that language like that in Gallagher's amendment could lead to "UFO disclosure."
In essence, it says that regardless of any previous written or oral non-disclosure agreements "that could be interpreted as a legal constraint on reporting by a witness of an unidentified aerial phenomena," those with information about UAPs, more commonly known as UFOs, would not be violating federal classified information laws if they come forward. The amendment also calls for the head of the new Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG), tasked with investigating UAPs on behalf of the Defense Secretary and Director of National Intelligence, to establish "a secure system" for receiving reports of "any events relating to" UAPs and any government or government contractor activity or program related to UAPs. The reporting system shall be administered by "designated and widely known, easily accessible, and appropriately cleared Department of Defense and intelligence community employees or contractors" as part of AOIMSG, which is a much enhanced and more deeply mandated effort that replaced the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.
Any information would first be screened "to prevent unauthorized public reporting or compromise of properly classified military and intelligence systems, programs, and related activity, including all categories and levels of special access and compartmented access programs, current, historical, and future." However, federal agencies and contractors working with the government would be precluded from taking actions, including suspending security clearances, for those who report UAP incidents and information. And those who are retaliated against "may bring a private civil action for all appropriate remedies, including injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, against the Government or other employer who took the personnel action, in the United States Court of Federal Claims," the amendment states.
priorities
Neo-Confederates and Christian nationalists
Neo-Confederates and Christian nationalists
Repugs will support any POS for office, as long as labelled "repug"
Despite Repeated Fumbles, Georgia Republicans Say They’re Sticking With Walker
Republicans are standing behind Herschel Walker,
the former football star,
despite an array of revelations, missteps and questions about his qualifications for a Senate seat.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/10/u...publicans.html
Joe broke them.Neo-Confederates and Christian nationalists
Repug SchutzStaffel ramping up their fascism to punish their political enemies on fabricated charges
The right's enemies list:
'Woke heat maps' target and track progressives for crack down
"woke heat map" do enting instances of "wokeness"
in an attempt to fight back against "critical race theory" and alleged "grooming" in schools across the state.
https://www.alternet.org/2022/07/the...or-crack-down/
Notice you don't see an alma mater indication
lol Twitter "news". The bill, HB 327 says nothing of the sort.
Take this piece of off your phone..you'll be better for it.
of courseNotice you don't see an alma mater indication
Yeah, I've already read it. Again, the bill makes no mention of the Holocaust at all.
Yep, though "Race or sex scapegoating" is as obscure and abstract term as you'll find.
I also don't see how you could possibly teach about the country's history of racism without tripping on it.
Seem to me that the bill was attempting to identify types of divisive concepts or arguments. I've got zero problem with somebody trying to identify the propaganda or motivation propelling a German soldier in world war II.
Education can only take sides when it benefits the left.
There's this carveout:
(1) The history of an ethnic group, as described in textbooks and instructional materials adopted in accordance with the Revised Code concerning textbooks and instructional materials;
(2) The impartial discussion of controversial aspects of history;
(3) The impartial instruction on the historical oppression of a particular group of people based on race, ethnicity, class, nationality, religion, or geographic region;
(4) Historical do ents permitted under statutory law, such as the national motto, the national anthem, the Ohio Cons ution, the United States Cons ution, the Revised Code, federal law, and United States Supreme Court decisions.
Who determines what's 'impartial' though? This is why laws like these are controversial to begin with.
You have no idea what you're speaking about dip .Neo-Confederates and Christian nationalists
You both have no idea tbh and you being from another country really have no clue.
I know a couple black dudes who have confederate, or more like REBEL, flag tattooed, not by me, on their arms. I've seen plenty of people from all walks of life sporting that flag.
I don't sport that flag because, though I'm southern, I really don't care one way or the other about it.
Tell that to the Ohio Republican who sponsored it.
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/...nt/7145188001/
"You should talk about these atrocities that have happened in history, but you also do have an obligation to point out the value that each individual brings to the table," Fowler Arthur said during the interview.
That already happens in history classes. Maybe you need to re-read the bill, Gramps.
Coming to an Ohio classroom near you!
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
