Page 128 of 128 FirstFirst ... 2878118124125126127128
Results 3,176 to 3,188 of 3188
  1. #3176
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    4,175
    Once upon a time the Spurs got 4 FRPs for Dejounte. Delusion is in the eye of the buyer tbh
    That never happened, it was 3 picks (one of which wasn't guaranteed to convey -- and didn't) plus a swap.

  2. #3177
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    That never happened, it was 3 picks (one of which wasn't guaranteed to convey -- and didn't) plus a swap.
    Semantics. The point is that there could be some stupid team out there that make that trade. And you’d never know unless you ask. Today NO would have to give up a FRP to get rid of DJ. Ffs they traded an unprotected 2026 FRP for McQueen. Other teams are stupid and do stupid things. The Bucks gave away their rights to their 28,29,30 FRPs to the Blazers WHILE trading away the better player in Holiday and then cut him and are on the hook for him for the next 5 seasons. Mikel Bridges (who has never sniffed an all star game in his life) got traded for 5 FRPs. You think the Nets said well we want 2 FRPs and the Knicks were like eh we will give you 5. No they probably asked for 5 FRPs for the dude and found the sucker team to take him.

  3. #3178
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    Semantics. The point is that there could be some stupid team out there that make that trade. And you’d never know unless you ask. Today NO would have to give up a FRP to get rid of DJ. Ffs they traded an unprotected 2026 FRP for McQueen. Other teams are stupid and do stupid things. The Bucks gave away their rights to their 28,29,30 FRPs to the Blazers WHILE trading away the better player in Holiday and then cut him and are on the hook for him for the next 5 seasons. Mikel Bridges (who has never sniffed an all star game in his life) got traded for 5 FRPs. You think the Nets said well we want 2 FRPs and the Knicks were like eh we will give you 5. No they probably asked for 5 FRPs for the dude and found the sucker team to take him.
    Just on Bridges. It was his contract that was a huge plus. He was this elite 3&D player one a good contract, which meant the Knicks could fit other players into their team salary. Unfortunately his D never returned so his contract is about right now.

  4. #3179
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Just on Bridges. It was his contract that was a huge plus. He was this elite 3&D player one a good contract, which meant the Knicks could fit other players into their team salary. Unfortunately his D never returned so his contract is about right now.
    I’m not saying he’s a bad player. But 5 draft picks? 5? You think any other team was that desperate if the Nets asked for 5 FRPs? They probably laughed and hung up. But not the Knicks

  5. #3180
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    1,151
    I’m not saying he’s a bad player. But 5 draft picks? 5? You think any other team was that desperate if the Nets asked for 5 FRPs? They probably laughed and hung up. But not the Knicks
    You do realize we gave up 4 first for Fox right? I know several will disagree with me but I have never thought the fox trade was a good trade for us. He only has one all star game. I know some will say the Charlotte pick should not count as it would not convey but we also gave a couple good 2nd round picks.

  6. #3181
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    You do realize we gave up 4 first for Fox right? I know several will disagree with me but I have never thought the fox trade was a good trade for us. He only has one all star game. I know some will say the Charlotte pick should not count as it would not convey but we also gave a couple good 2nd round picks.
    If you’re counting the Charlotte one, that’s foolishness. CHA was already clearly going to be in the lottery by the trade deadline. That was absolutely going to convey as two seconds. If we had kept the Chicago pick, the same thing would have happened. They only put on a finishing kick when they got their pick back. A 39-43 team finished 18-15, and made the play in.

  7. #3182
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    If you’re counting the Charlotte one, that’s foolishness. CHA was already clearly going to be in the lottery by the trade deadline. That was absolutely going to convey as two seconds. If we had kept the Chicago pick, the same thing would have happened. They only put on a finishing kick when they got their pick back. A 39-43 team finished 18-15, and made the play in.
    the trade was made in the offseason and there were 3 years worth of protections, so i dont think you can write it off in hindsight. even if it didnt seem likely at all to convey in 2023, two years past that is a long time

  8. #3183
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    1,151
    If you’re counting the Charlotte one, that’s foolishness. CHA was already clearly going to be in the lottery by the trade deadline. That was absolutely going to convey as two seconds. If we had kept the Chicago pick, the same thing would have happened. They only put on a finishing kick when they got their pick back. A 39-43 team finished 18-15, and made the play in.
    Charlotte I was kind of excluding as I agree that one would not have conveyed. Chicago still had 2 more years to convey. Also when you look back it will still show as 4 first round picks.

  9. #3184
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    Charlotte I was kind of excluding as I agree that one would not have conveyed. Chicago still had 2 more years to convey. Also when you look back it will still show as 4 first round picks.
    I would call it something like 2.7 or 2.8 firsts. CHA25 never had a chance, SA27 and MIN31 were guaranteed to convey, and CHI25(/26/27) had about a 70-80% chance of eventually conveying.

  10. #3185
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    4,175
    If you’re counting the Charlotte one, that’s foolishness. CHA was already clearly going to be in the lottery by the trade deadline. That was absolutely going to convey as two seconds. If we had kept the Chicago pick, the same thing would have happened. They only put on a finishing kick when they got their pick back. A 39-43 team finished 18-15, and made the play in.
    I agree with the Charlotte pick not conveying and the fact that sending Chicago their pick back had a huge influence in them falling outside protections, they probably would have tanked ever so slightly to fall within the protections. But that pick had a decent chance of conveying in the next couple of years. All in all, it's probably better portrayed as 3 firsts (one high variance -Minnesota-, one reasonably good -Chicago-, another low upside -Spurs-) plus 4 seconds (Charlotte pick counts as 2 seconds)

  11. #3186
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    You do realize we gave up 4 first for Fox right? I know several will disagree with me but I have never thought the fox trade was a good trade for us. He only has one all star game. I know some will say the Charlotte pick should not count as it would not convey but we also gave a couple good 2nd round picks.
    I'm not a huge fan of Fox and think this may still turn out not that entirely great. But as others have said, it's really just the SAS's own pick a couple years from now and the Dillingham pick. Obviously that Minnesota pick could turn out to be really good, but probably not. The CHI pick would be late lotto at best this year or otherwise.

    It's a really good deal, even if DAF is a vanishing archetype in the NBA, a poor-defense, non-PG, high volume scorer.

  12. #3187
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    You do realize we gave up 4 first for Fox right? I know several will disagree with me but I have never thought the fox trade was a good trade for us. He only has one all star game. I know some will say the Charlotte pick should not count as it would not convey but we also gave a couple good 2nd round picks.
    I do realize that. But what is slightly different between us and the Knicks is that we don’t give away 4 of our own draft picks. The Knicks literally gave up all their picks. We just gave up one of our own picks (in a season where we still have another pick) so it’s not quite the same. But yes on paper we traded away 4 FRPs.

    Which is why it is smart for the Suns to ask for the moon. You never know which team will say yes.

  13. #3188
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    Yea PHX is high. This was never happening.


    And the Spurs’ reported offer was what? Vassell, Barnes, and #14?

    That means if the two sides had decided to meet in the middle, then the final trade would’ve been something like Vassell, Barnes, Sochan, #14, and a future first round pick.

    Would that have been a good deal for the Spurs? Is it better than what the Suns got out of Houston?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •