Reply With Quote
I already answered that: could be anybody. There's zero evidence it's Shillary or any other client.
My question was straightforward and simple. I didn't ask you if you thought she was a crook and I didn't ask you if this would affect her much. I asked you that given the timing of the Benghazi committee results requesting her emails the day before is it more plausible he is talking about his client Hillary Clinton or another client?
I already answered that: could be anybody. There's zero evidence it's Shillary or any other client.
It shows nobody voting for/leaning towards Hillary gave enough of a crap to bring it up specifically. Where are the concerns about Hillary by Trump supporters, Republicans, and independents?
But you're still missing the whole point: what you or I think is irrelevant. What really matters is: can she go down due to that? is that the fabled "smoking gun"?
I don't think it's anywhere near close. Maybe they'll be more leaks in the forthcoming weeks or months and one will show up, but that one isn't it.
Ultimately, what do you care about? What you or I think? or Shillary going down in flames? I'm pretty sure it's the latter.
You didn't answer it. Which is more plausible?
I'm sure Republicans are all over it... 29%, 35% sound reasonable... that should tell you also where independents are on this.
And, IMO, it's not that they don't care, but the alternative is Trump on the other end of the ballot, tbh...
I did answer it. You might not like the answer, and it might not be one of the canned answers you proposed, but that's your problem.
I get that. And I'm not coming after you for the poll but using that to say nobody cares about her emails is misleading considering the limited poll respondents. It sent Reck into a tailspin.
I'm like your non-answer. I'm fine with it
This election got so bad, like this flies under the radar. It's like Trump calling Messicans rapists. They're both still going strong and one of them is going to be the next prez... disgusting.
I do, however, blame the GOP section of Congress for overdoing a lot of this stuff... ultra-politicizes this stuff, removes meaning from it.
Just as I blame the Dem section of Congress for taking a on our privacy rights.
This TSA er is a dumbass.
You were proven wrong. Your 35% suddenly became 60 out of thin air after you exhausted all possible comeback.
Also, have you ever heard of coincidences? The fact that the days of the event in question are close doesn't prove . Only in your little mind are you connecting the two to be linked.
Yes, great idea, let me, a professional IT guy jump online and ask for help doing something highly questionable and illegal. No one will notice.
You're better off mulling over what your next conspiracy is going to be about. Am I right or am I wrong?
He wouldn't be the first guy that thought he was posting anonymously and was eventually found out in the interwebs...
Then again, scrubbing archived email addresses isn't illegal per-se, and nowhere on his post he mentions subpoenas, etc. That's why the post itself isn't really incriminating.
The whole professional IT guy is highly questionable too, IMO, not because of asking questions on Reddit, but particularly the information he provided with the question: At least when it comes to IT security, you don't let other people know you're handling VIPs, that makes you a target. I stopped working specifically in IT security a couple years ago, but I can only imagine the bar is higher at this point, with all the hacks going around.
So, yeah, the guy is probably a dumbass. But that's not necessarily a crime.
i just flipped a coin. was it heads or tails? ANSWER IT DONT DODGEI'm like your non-answer. I'm fine with it
I thought you were maybe just drunk last night and were being dumb because of that, but it appears you are just dumb all the time. Use a calculator if you are having trouble with simple addition.This TSA er is a dumbass.
You were proven wrong. Your 35% suddenly became 60 out of thin air after you exhausted all possible comeback.
Also, have you ever heard of coincidences? The fact that the days of the event in question are close doesn't prove . Only in your little mind are you connecting the two to be linked.
Yes, great idea, let me, a professional IT guy jump online and ask for help doing something highly questionable and illegal. No one will notice.
You're better off mulling over what your next conspiracy is going to be about. Am I right or am I wrong?
https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/07/30/poll-results-hillary-clinton/
How serious of a problem do you think it is that Hillary Clinton used a personal email address to conduct government business while working as Secretary of State?
Very serious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35%
Somewhat serious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...25%
You did get one thing right though, Mark Combetta, a professional IT guy did go online and ask for help on altering archived emails. Unless you don't think he did of course, which would make you wrong again.
Do you think that was Mark Combetta asking those questions or do you think this is all fabricated?
The emails Assange has been releasing lead me to believe someone had access to the entire server for a long long time. October should be interesting.
Why would he wait till October? And furthermore, why does anti-American Assange want Trump to win?
Nothing is interesting in this race anymore, IMO. There's 10000x things more interesting than following that trainwreck, tbh
He hates Shillary. The reason why has already been posted on one of the Assange threads.
Hillary's campaign ain't stumbling this week. regaining momentum, even her "honesty" approval is way up.
#NeverTrash
he's kinda right about one thing, she voted with Bush to go into Iraq and agreed we needed to get Saddam's WMDs... then she denied it later... liar.
The problem for Trump is that even if he wins them, those states aren't enough.
If Trump wins all three — plus Iowa, which is also a tossup in recent polls, and Florida, where Clinton appears to hold a slight lead — he would still fall short of a majority of electoral votes.
To get a majority he needs to do all that and break the Democrats' hold on one of the states they have repeatedly won in recent elections.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/trum...e+Raw+Story%29
no... Trump is up in FL (though by less than a point overall at the moment, but most of the pro-HRC polls are older), IA, OH (big time) and NV... all those bring him up to 268 vs HRC's 272. If Trump hauls in that extra electoral vote in Maine E2, it's Trump 269, HRC 271.
If and when those states start going from tossup/slight Trump to likely Trump, he'll just need one more domino to fall. Could be CO, VA, MI, WI, PA (looking less likely), NH (doubtful because it's more blue than media gives it credit for) or none. If it's none, then HRC wins by a hair. If one of those does go Trump, then Trump wins.
You didn't have a good last night and you come back for more? Your penchant for humiliation has been noted.
You dug one of the deepest holes last night I've ever seen on this site and it dawned on me, I'd been duped. Normally I'd go back post by post and show you but I'm not getting trolled again. It's obvious now you just act dumb and say utterly stupid things you know are wrong just to get a rise out of people. I'm done falling for it but have to commend you for keeping up the schtick for as long as you have. Occasionally you slip out of character and say something intelligent but I'd say you stay in character about 95% of the time. Only poster I can think of that stays in character better is ducks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions