Reply With Quote
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/sweden-took-162k-refugees-last-year-494-got-jobs/#ixzz4XHu8ANAI
rofl
Never have I but this is the stuff that a simple google search would yield in no time.
You just gotta follow the links.
Warlords of Draenor introduced shadowflame demons.
http://wow.gamepedia.com/World_of_Wa...rds_of_Draenor
And that game came out in 2014 as well so DMC simply just the bed trying to force a joke in.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/sweden-took-162k-refugees-last-year-494-got-jobs/#ixzz4XHu8ANAI
rofl
chicken s
Just a fraction of President Trump’s executive advisers reacted to his immigration ban
Nearly 50 companies are advising Trump, but less than half of those executives have discussed immigration ban
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/30/only...migration-ban/
Trump’s press secretary makes the case for restricting 5-year-olds coming into the US
Sean er’s answer came in response to questions about Trump’s executive order on immigration, which has been criticized as a “Muslim ban.”
“That’s why we slow [the process] down a little,” er said at the daily press briefing.
“To make sure that if they are a 5-year-old, that maybe they’re with their parents and they don’t pose a threat. But to assume that just because of someone’s age or gender or whatever that they don’t pose a threat would be misguided and wrong.”
The argument, essentially, is that basically anyone from the restricted Muslim-majority countries can do dangerous things, so we should carefully vet and potentially ban even young children from entering the US.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politi...cer-5-year-old
Sean Goebbels er
Hours after Trump’s Muslim ban, Texas mosque burned to the ground
The Islamic Center of Victoria, which supports roughly 100 local Muslims in the community roughly 125 miles from Houston, was completely gutted by the fire, and its leader watched helplessly as their mosque was destroyed.
“It’s a house of worship,” said Islamic Center of Victoria president Shahid Hashmi,
http://usuncut.com/news/trump-muslim-ban-mosque-fire/
Target was $850K to rebuild. Donations are already over $900K, in less than 3 days.
Unfortunately, that's codified on Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the Cons ution.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
You can thank slavery for that. It was actually codified there to prevent it from being stricken down by the Supreme court or a Congressional majority vote (apparently back then the Civil Rights Act which defined citizenship and naturalization was hotly contested in Congress).
So it would take another Cons utional amendment to bring it down.
Not sure it applies to illegals though, they are not subject to the jurisdiction if they are not here legally, thus we can deport them without much ado.
Well, if they can be arrested, tried and jailed in the US while they're in the US, they're clearly subject to the jurisdiction. The "subject to the jurisdiction" part comes from the fact that en ies such as US embassies in other countries are also considered "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/donal...er-blessed-ban
Jihadist groups on Sunday celebrated the Trump administration's ban on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries, saying the new policy validates their claim that the United States is at war with Islam.
Comments posted to pro-Islamic State social media accounts predicted that President Donald Trump's executive order would persuade American Muslims to side with the extremists. One posting hailed the U.S. president as "the best caller to Islam," while others predicted that Trump would soon launch a new war in the Middle East.
So... the Republicans would have to get 66 out of 100 seats in Senate or at least close to that and pull up a few moderate Democrats? That would be an extremely rare heavy tilt, but it's actually not impossible given the nature of how the 2018 races shape up, 26 Democrats to 8 Republicans I believe defending their seats. All thanks in part to how remarkably well the Republicans defended the Senate in 2016 in spite of similarly long odds.
That's just to propose it. Then it needs to be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures (38 states at present). Right now the GOP controls 32 legislatures, and it's not even a sure thing they would all vote for it, IMO.
Passing a Cons utional Amendment is very difficult. That's why we have very few in such a long history.
And another thing:::they'll be voting here on in. 75%+ starting next year.
Who will be voting here on in? The Republicans always vote more than Democrats anyways.
So a new amendment is unlikely. Well then.
Executive order, bam. Barry loved it, Trump is even more fast-finger with it than Barry already it seems. Let's see
https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-...174303609.html
“I’ll tell you the whole history of it,” Giuliani said in an interview with Fox News’ Jeanine Pirro on Saturday night. “When he first announced it, he said ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.'”
Looks like they still didn't do it legally..for the most part or we wouldn't have judges and procecutors saying why dont you stop for a moment.
That's some logic. What's the alternative, just surrender and spread our buttcheeks?
pwetty pweeeaase let's not make them angwy and give them what they want
If these Muslims get mad and convert, then that just proves it was the right thing to do to not let more of these nut jobs in. Once they're exposed as radical Jihadists, Trump will just get tougher on the ones here domestically meaning we'll be even closer to ridding ourselves of these pests. You're logic doesn't make any sense at all and sounds like something a literal cuckold would say.
Islamists and Democrats use the same talking points -- weird.
tranny Julie Annie admitted Trash wanted a Muslim ban and asked JA how not to call it a Muslim ban.
sycophant JA's great insight of slime was to use Obama's list of countries, not religions.
Julie Annie is as ing stupid as he is obnoxious.
IT'S A MUSLIM BAN
Jeffrey Lord accidentally admits travel ban targets Muslims: ‘We’re not being attacked by Episcopalians
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/jeff...e+Raw+Story%29
IT'S A MUSLIM BAN
Example?
Pretty sure the whole "religious war" thing is a lot more prevalent in Republican talking points.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
