Mueller vs Barr round 1

[Winehole23]

I'm sure someone will tell me the conspiracy theory I wholeheartedly believe and repeat often but can't even begin to explain except for saying muh insurance.

Kind of like Russiagaters with the continual drumbeat of doom during the Mueller investigation.

[Winehole23]

Bonnerific strawmanning it up as usual.

First of all, who shut down Mueller and second of all, why do you think you can read other posters minds?

My trend of negging Trump and his suporters is well established. It won't cease.

You're just sore I have criticism left over for you.

[Winehole23]

Must sting getting filed in the motivated reasoning bin along with so many posters you hate.

[ElNono]

You didn't deny anything I said because you know it's true. You have no convictions, you're just Team Trump all the way. Pathetic how low you've sunk after being a somewhat credible, even-keeled Kasich supporter. I guess you were just desperate to fit in with all those super cool 4chan guys so you jumped on the bandwagon. loser

After 20+ years living here, I still don’t understand that of Americans... the marriage with a particular political party. You would think getting older makes you wiser, yet I see the exact opposite. It hardens positions to the point where hypocrisy is rampant. There might be mild disagreements, and even admission of a wrong move between the fans of the same faction, but as soon as you bring up the other team, it’s borderline personal for some reason.

I don’t want to generalize, it doesn’t happen with everybody, but it is all too common.

[a777pilot]

...and the winners are: Horowitz, Huber, Rogers, Campbell, Collyer, Barr and god himself, Trump!

Repeal the 22d Amendment.....now!

[a777pilot]

After 20+ years living here, I still don’t understand that of Americans... the marriage with a particular political party. You would think getting older makes you wiser, yet I see the exact opposite. It hardens positions to the point where hypocrisy is rampant. There might be mild disagreements, and even admission of a wrong move between the fans of the same faction, but as soon as you bring up the other team, it’s borderline personal for some reason.

I don’t want to generalize, it doesn’t happen with everybody, but it is all too common.

Where did you live before here?

It would be nice, but doesn't happen on this site, that an opinion can be expressed without being labeled a re ed ing fool.

Sad.

[a777pilot]

People to watch in the news....

Horowitz, Huber, Rogers, Campbell, Collyer, Barr and Trump. It's going to be an interesting year and a half.

Trump-2020!

[a777pilot]

But you are a ing fraud. You are re ed, and a worthless piece of that needs to die.

So kill your self. It will the single honorable thing you will have ever done in your lie of a life

You're cute!

[rastaspur]

20% of it is redacted.

[rastaspur]

no you guys are moronic sheep that need to wake up.. you dont even know who is your enemy.. i know its hard but do some critical thinking

Critical thinking. Heed your own advice, for brains.

[rastaspur]

One salient point to keep in mind for the Democrats and the members of the Obama Administration, the one point that got Nixon into hot water with impeachment was his misuse of the CIA and FBI toobstructe justice and to spy on the Democrat Party.

Obama and his minions, are in deep kimchi.

That unsung hero of all of this, who I am still waiting for y'all to figure out who, is going to put a mul ude of Obama people, and just possibly, Obama himself in serious legal jeopardy.

Lol.

Delusional.

[rastaspur]

1) they agreed with white house counsel that they lacked authority to indict a sitting president

2) when somebody faces an accusation, they typically have the recourse of standing trial and being found not guilty. there's a process to clear their name.

3) as they could not indict trump, there would be no parallel to that. if they just said "we cant charge trump, but we conclude he's guilty of crimes" then its basically just a smear with no chance for him to defend himself in court and clear his name. that's the "fairness" concerns they cite

4) therefore they decided that they were not allowed to come to a formal conclusion that the president committed any crime


i posted about this in another thread... predictably didnt get a single response

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...=1#post9782553

[a777pilot]

Again, I say....Horowitz, Huber, Rogers, Campbell and Collyer.

Obama and his people are in deep kimchi.

....nothing is going to happen however. It's the golden rule: He with the gold, rules!

[boutons_deux]

Mueller was a Special Counselor,

not, like in yet another Repug Nixon's case,

a Special Prosecutor.

[a777pilot]

Mueller was a Special Counselor,

not, like in yet another Repug Nixon's case,

a Special Prosecutor.

In Nixon's case there was an Independent Counsel. It was not a Special Prosecutor. Words have meaning, no as if we choose to pay any attention to the meanings of words these days.

[Pavlov]

In Nixon's case there was an Independent Counsel. It was not a Special Prosecutor. Words have meaning, no as if we choose to pay any attention to the meanings of words these days.

Cox and Jaworski were special prosecutors. The term independent counsel wasn't used until 1983.

IOW, you're wrong again.

[a777pilot]

Cox and Jaworski were special prosecutors. The term independent counsel wasn't used until 1983.

IOW, you're wrong again.

I stand corrected. They were special prosecutors. Thanks for the correction.

[CosmicCowboy]

Why do you think mueller wrote letters to Barr with concerns about how he portrayed the findings in his report? Why do you think Barr refuses to release the summaries written by the special counsel?

He released them in full you dumbass.

[boutons_deux]

He released them in full you dumbass.

Congress wants the full unredacted report (with a few reasonable redactions), not Barr's heavy-redacted Trash-defending/"exonerating" cherry picking

[CosmicCowboy]

Muellers summary was released, asshole. You are not only a disgusting pig, you are ing stupid too.

[CosmicCowboy]

Muellers summary was released, asshole. You are not only a disgusting pig, you are ing stupid too. They were released in full on April 18th.

[Pavlov]

Muellers summary was released, asshole.

You got a link to that? I thought there were summaries for each section tbh.

[CosmicCowboy]

You got a link to that? I thought there were summaries for each section tbh.

Just Google it. I read it through a link on snopes. There are summaries for both sections.

[spurraider21]

Thought the summaries were part of the report and are available.

Mueller was upset that at the time, Barr chose to release his own summary rather than the mueller summary.

[a777pilot]

Y'all do know that by law Barr is not required to anything with the Muller report other than announce it has been reported.