Reply With Quote
You said "Yes or no: A bazooka is a gun"
So yeah, you did say "gun". You didn't say "firearm".
Your lazy ass stupid, depressed, hopeless demeanor is part and parcel of the group you serve.
I have to go three years and to another continent to find a bazooka murder.
https://southcoastherald.co.za/34760...till-unsolved/
Today's cuck.
You said "Yes or no: A bazooka is a gun"
So yeah, you did say "gun". You didn't say "firearm".
Your lazy ass stupid, depressed, hopeless demeanor is part and parcel of the group you serve.
If you put all categories that contain guns into one, firearms would be in that category.
You took one across the visage with that . This is bad, even for you.
Of course, you blabber talk all night but you are unable to answer the questions that your comments obviously raise.
Par
You're trying to accuse a poster of being unable to answer questions raised by that poster's comments?
Knee-jerk sperm shielding. Par.You're trying to accuse a poster of being unable to answer questions raised by that poster's comments?
You should go back and see where your cuck bestie stepped in it.
No. I'm mocking DMC's complaint.
"Mocking" and sperm shielding aren't mutually exclusive.
I get it though; you don't want to come down on your cuckstie.
I asked derp if he thought a bazooka is a gun. That's why I prompted it with "yes or no"
The only thing I did wrong there that is completely throwing you for a loop is leave the question mark off.
You're a ing moron.
I already said "ok" to move forward but you guys are still wanting to end zone dance over this really really important distinction.
The BATF does not consider all firearms to be guns. You're trying to save face but it's too late.
Because I am not beta like you. I lead the way. We'll move on when I say.
And I asked you what possible relevance it could have to the stats, and you went and hid in your cuckoon.
I know, dumbass. I never said they did, dumbass. That's why I questioned your chart, dumbass.
Like I said, you're not really here to discuss the topic.
We can move on now.
Never would've happened if we just had gotten rid of knives.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/104509...breaking-live/
the result of capitulating tbh. the UK is a mess as is the rest of the EU. the "refugees"; let them all rot in the desert tbh.
It's actually great, tbh... I mean, obviously RIP to the two victims, but casualties completely minimized, the vast majority of hurt people will recover, and the assailant dead (by gunshot from LEO no less).
If the murdered would've put at least a bullet on each one of the people he attacked, we would be talking about many more innocent victims, no doubt.
Plus, then the discussion would veer towards how this person was either mentally ill or a terrorist depending on the color of his skin, etc, anything to actually address the fact that gun control worked as intended here...
That's all good in a vacuum. But there are plenty of other worldly realities out there.
There's nothing in a vacuum in my post, tbh, just as the left in general likes to bring up gun control as a political issue every time there's a mass shooting, it's also proper to acknowledge when gun control works in countries that don't have a 2nd amendment.
Of course it's in a vacuum in your post. Take away the barriers of safe carry and people wouldn't pull this sh** very often at all b/c they'd know a bullet in their brain quickly is a strong outcome. Also, your situation completely ignores other big picture items. Also "working" is a police state for you; this goes along with the big picture stuff.
Of course they would. They don't do this because they're afraid to die. They want to do as much damage as possible in the little time they can. It's kamikaze , there's no deterrent here. To that extent, what type of tools can they get their hands on matters, and a lot.
Do tell what 'big picture' items I'm missing, tbh...
And FWIW, in case you're not aware, I've always been a supporter of the 2nd amendment. I do think certain regulations like mandatory background checks need to happen, but overall, I don't know that what works in the UK or Japan would work in the US or vice versa.
All that said, it would be completely vacuous to deny that whatever controls they put in place there have worked in this particular case.
If only the UK allowed people to own handguns like the USA, they too could have a murder rate ...(looks down)... four times greater than they do right now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
