The evidence I have presented stands on its own
Wow, someone is feeling insecure.
When everything is a conspiracy to someone, someone is a conspira .
The evidence I have presented stands on its own
you are part of the problem with groupthink....
So you have no clue and will only post videos about something you nothing about, got it.
Nice fold when called out, please come again.
At least Im not burying my head in the sand and pretending to know the truth for which I actually know very little about......don't you see how that makes you look? Does the phrase personal nirvana come to mind?
OK, you're making me ask you again: What do you think really happened on 9/11?
You ever get tired of being wrong, and mean-spirited? That has got to wear on the psyche.
Not going to watch an hour plus video. Summary?
The problem of credibility is your and these asshats, who year after year, make assertions without providing much proof.
Skimmed the videos to get a general sense of what this guy is trying to say, and he basically has "the NIST got the mechanism of collapse wrong".
I looked for any report, or peer review of what he has written.
Are either available?
When you look at the mechanisms that would have to have been put in place to fake the moon landing, 9/11, lack of aliens, fed as evil empire or any of the other conspira takes he comes with it becomes how obviously full of they are.
"Muh model isn't the same as the NIST model.
"
...but as we are finding out with UFOs, the government has its handymen, like you, do it's legwork for them and then when things go sideways you just bury your head in the sand and refuse to look at evidence
Whaaa...an hour long video
Chumpy, RG Fuzzy all the same characters....cant handle that a forensic pathologists with Tenure, a Lariat in his field, this guy grades stuff like the NIST report says that there is no way fire brought down WTC7...but they are TOO BUSY...to watch the proof....kinda tells you all you need to know about how these guys research stuff they peddle here
What we are finding out about UFOs is that no one with first hand proof of alien craft in possession of the government has shown up.
Only second hand about someone said or I read has been provided.
Try again re .
As far as the video, your expert has provided no argument as to what caused the fall of the World Trade Towers, so try again, as only viable reality are fires from plane crashes.
I watched it. It's what he says. He has his model. It's different from NIST's model. I don't think either model could possibly recreate the conditions of that day. Do you?
What do you say really happened to WTC7, dan?
Let's discuss your theory.
Don't be a chicken after 20 years.
Step up. Claim your legacy.
And just lie with Christians, you are pointless to discuss things with because you take all this on faith.
international shadow cabal controlling everything
magic sky man controlling everything
You do not remember but I entertained and even agreed with some of the NIST criticism. I tried to explain how the modeling was done and you reverted to your shadow cabal any time there was uncertainty.
Bend over. I'll give ya a in' cabal.
Only in Fuzzy land is a Forensic Pathologists Lauret who has testified before every organization investigating 911 "a shadow cabal"...this was never about finding the truth....it was about entertaining your ego
I didn't fail....NIST failed
No need to disect what happened....only prove that WTC7 was not brought down by fire and the story collapses
Again I know how you define your God of the gaps. Nice irony about the ego comment btw.
I've been saying for 20 years...the key to disproving the official 911 narrative is WTC7.
Your entire legacy depends on proving a negative.
Sorry, that's not how anything works in real life.
You believe something else happened.
What happened?
You have to present an alternative conspiracy theory that is actually plausible and possible.
This is your final and complete failure, dan -- you can't even think of how anything else could have happened.
You had 20 years, You did nothing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)