Reply With Quote
like clockwork
Trump calls for end of Mueller probe,
saying it’s ‘discredited’ by Carter Page surveillance
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-calls-for-end-of-mueller-probe-saying-its-discredited-by-carter-page-surveillance/2018/07/23/c166c2a6-8e64-11e8-b769-e3fff17f0689_story.html?utm_term=.2986cc826be6&wpi src=nl_most&wpmm=1
Trash can hear Mueller / NY AG toot-tooting their imminent arrival.
lolSpeaking of orange ass kissing...
“The FBI has reviewed this verified application for accuracy in accordance with its April 5, 2001 procedures, which include sending a copy of the draft to the appropriate field office(s).”
Did the FBI properly follow the Woods procedure yes or no?
And?
Page had been outed as a FISA target a weak earlier than these events.
More than one leak, but I guess interesting if the whole first application is out there. More interesting would be the ever expanding findings that appeared in each renewal application.
You'll have to highlight each use of the dossier in each application for me so I can make a judgment.
Thanks in advance.
Unnecessary. It was used in all applications.
Did the FBI properly follow the Woods procedure yes or no?
Straw man. I wasn't arguing that it wasn't. My request indicates precisely the opposite.
You'll have to highlight each use of the dossier in each application for me so I can make a judgment.
Thanks in advance.
Unnecessary and white flag accepted.
Necessary. If you can't even say how it was used, I accept your white flag.
It's your claim, dumbass. Back it up or back down.
Completely unnecessary. Pick any time the dossier was used.
Did the FBI properly follow the Woods procedure yes or no?
Show them all to me.
It's your claim. Back it up or back down.
Steele was no longer used as a source after the first one.TSA
ANOTHER DEEP STATE JUDGE!
I haven’t made a claim I’ve asked you a simple question that you continue to dodge.
Has Darrin gone to sleep since yesterday? Guy has been putting in the extra work.
The dossier was used even after the FBI terminated Steele.Steele was no longer used as a source after the first one.
SOMEONE DO SOMETHING!
Oddly enough, everything in the Steele dossier that can be independently verified... checks out.
Further, the 412 page application has a LOT more information that is all redacted, and which persuaded four judges to sign off.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...sa-jake-tapperThe do ents released on Saturday show the Steele dossier was part of the FBI’s application, but it wasn’t all of it.
Much of what’s disclosed in the FBI do entation discredits parts of the Nunes memo, a do ent released by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) in February that claimed the FBI was biased in wiretapping Page and launching the Russia investigation altogether. Judges weighing the application — all four Republican appointees — were made aware of the cir stances of the Steele dossier, and they were provided with evidence beyond its contents anyway.
“I don’t think they did anything wrong. I think they went to the court, they got the judges to approve it, they laid out all the information, and there was a lot of reasons unrelated to the dossier for why they wanted to look at Carter Page,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a separate appearance on State of the Union on Sunday.
Oh, you don't even have a claim about the Woods procedure.
Great -- neither do I. I would have to see each use of the dossier in the applications to make a judgment.
Thanks in advance for compiling them all for me seeing how this is so important to you that you have no claim.
Once you do that, I'll be happy to make a claim that you somehow unable or unwilling to make.
Steele was closed off as a source.
Show the parts of each application where it was used.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
