Reply With Quote
Frankly Blake... you're not worth my time... and if you had been as smart as you claim to be....you would have known that mouse doesn't really believe anything his trolls are posting... he just likes stirring the fold.
9-11 truth: 1
mouse: 0
Frankly Blake... you're not worth my time... and if you had been as smart as you claim to be....you would have known that mouse doesn't really believe anything his trolls are posting... he just likes stirring the fold.
but you just wanted to stop in and say o.
where did I claim to be smart?and if you had been as smart as you claim to be....
ok, I'll put up: Phenomanul is a liar. (He's also an idiot.)
If you were as smart as you claim to be, this board wouldn't be worth your time.
You would also have no problem showing evidence of a young earth that would easily refute the findings of geologists, astronomers and any other scientist worth a damn.
I've read mouse's posts for a little more than 7 years, going back to some EZ board days, as well as the old WOAI feedback zone with Duel and Parker, etc.you would have known that mouse doesn't really believe anything his trolls are posting... he just likes stirring the fold.
I know with some certainty that he doesn't believe in evolution, but is more than certain of a huge conspiracy concerning the events of 9/11......
now him being a real Mavs fan is something I'm not sure about.....I'm thinking he's just pissed probably because Pop may have called him a loser when mouse used to be a frequent caller during the Don and Walter days of STSA.
so what's your opinion of the Bible? Is it real? ...... (in your opinion)
Blake is on your ignore list
Bliss...
wuss..........
aww.....and I didn't even get to ask him what a guy with multiple degrees from MIT and superior cosmic knowledge does for a living in Corpus Christi.
beh, he wouldn't have answered any way.
Blake is on fire today! I may have to break out my Alex Jones on his ass!
About time somebody got fired up!!!
Whoopee!
What!?!?
Rule # 62 Darwin's father was Satan!
never thought you and I would have something in common. i put him there some time ago, what took you so long lol
Last edited by MiamiHeat; 06-03-2009 at 04:02 PM.
that makes 3 in the last year off the top of my head...
I really am on fire.
Do you also close your ears when they cuss on South Park?
I subconsciously put the over/under at 10:30 am for that article to pop up. Good work.
Of course this changes everything....
Didn't I just relate to you (in a different thread) how many secular, mainstream authorities shot down the grandiose exaggerations about Ida only for you to call my source biased and angry?
I do think your source was biased...it was. For the millionth time my point wasn't whether or not it changed history.....my point wasn't to lend credibility to the find or its early reportings. The point was that many of the anti-evolutionists spend more time ignoring or fighting against historical findings than actually paying them the attention they deserve.
Its like auto-pilot with you guys. These people are like the Rush Limbaughs of the world. Dude spends all his energy fighting Obama rather than use his intelligence and power to make things better. One track mind against evolution.
Right. So even though it said everything correctly and without a creationist tilt, it's biased because ...?
Didn't you essentially accuse me of making stuff up by specifically asking for the links?
Did I accuse you of making stuff up? Its biased because that entire site you linked me to was based in modern day religion and their beliefs. Great job calling it right. Just because something is right doesn't mean its not biased or founded in biased beliefs. It/he ended up being right, give him a star and move on. Should we now trust in everything written on that site?
I distinctly remember a site that called the McDyess signing nearly a day before it was official. (hoopshype) I think. Just because they're right doesn't automatically give them credibility.
Blah blah.
Ready to admit you're a hypocrite for calling my source biased, slanted and angry while readily accepting everything you were told by the "unbiased" mainstream scientific media?
No.
I'll admit that your bias source turned out to be right about something. Doesn't make me a hypocrite.
You'll get nothing else from me.
hyp⋅o⋅crite /ˈhɪpəkrɪt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [hip-uh-krit] Show IPA
–noun 1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
You support and base conclusions off sources that are proven to repeatedly exaggerate and falsify implications of evidence. Additionally, you ignore and insult opposing perspectives, even when they are proven to be accurate, because they are "biased" and therefore untrustworthy.
That's not hypocrisy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
