Cosmos on Fox & NGC

[RD2191]

How do you determine what is true then?

Scientific method

[xmas1997]

More circular arguments IMHO.
Where on earth did someone get the idea that evolution theory disproves the existence of God?
The bible?
Who, who has any sort of higher education at all, believes in a literal translation of the bible?
I appeal to some reasonableness here because we are discussing truth, not conjecture and here say.
Some on here arbitrarily set themselves up as authorities on the subject when sorry to say the truth is they don't know from shinola.



And if you just have to have a link then google "Who has the burden of proof when discussing God? It's all there on many threads in black and white, I didn't make it up.

[Clipper Nation]

Just watched my dvr'd episode from last night, damn Neil spray farted in creationists mouth

Neil is on that LeBron no headband swag, while creationist Jeebo s are pulling a Lakers and getting blown out at home by 48

[RD2191]

So did anyone ever find proof of evolution? Oh no, you just believe some guy on television.

[xmas1997]

How was the question I posed for you not directly related to "burden of proof?"

It's not chicken or the egg. No one could really dispute the claim that God exists until the claim was already made - even if they hypothetically could, you know that's not the case here. The claim that some kind of God exists had to be made before others could dispute that claim.

The argument of "real vs not real" itself my very well be fruitless with no clear cut answer because no one can "prove" that something does not exist - as I pointed out in an earlier post, but no can truly claim that God does in fact exist either. Regardless of that, it is not what I asked you.

Why shouldn't the burden of proof be placed squarely on the shoulders of those who are supporting the original claim?

I agree with practically everything you said.
But to answer your question as best I can, because we don't know who made the claims in the first place.
Thus we have a chicken and egg scenario IMHO.
It could easily be put on the pros side, but that is the easy way out, and that was then, and this is now.
And now, there are arguments pro and con. Were there arguments over it way back then?
Who knows?
Thus I am caused to focus on what is argued now.

And NOW, if someone claims the non-existence of God, then the BOP falls to him, and conversely, if someone claims the existence of God, then the BOP falls to him.

[ChumpDumper]

So did anyone ever find proof of evolution? Oh no, you just believe some guy on television.

Same could be said of you and god tbh.

[RD2191]

Can science prove love exist?

[ChumpDumper]

Can science prove love exist?

Since there are several experiments describing love scientifically, sure.

[RD2191]

Since there are several experiments describing love scientifically, sure.

bull

[TinTin]

bull

What's your highest completed level of education?

[ChumpDumper]

bull

Do you think this is how you are supposed to make an argument?

Still waiting on your proof that God exists, btw.

[xmas1997]

There is a lot science has as of yet cannot answer such as love, gravity, time, etc., but they are working on it, as they are on God as well.

[xmas1997]

http://people.howstuffworks.com/love6.htm

But has science tackled nachos yet?
That'll be a tough one.

[RD2191]

I said prove Love exist, not what scientist think love is.

[TinTin]

but they are working on it, as they are on God as well.

That's interesting. Do you have any recent news, links of any studies, experiments etc. being conducted to prove the existence of God? Would love to read up on such said matters

[RD2191]

Do you think this is how you are supposed to make an argument?

Still waiting on your proof that God exists, btw.

Plenty of proof, you can find it on your own.

[RD2191]

What's your highest completed level of education?

5th grade

[ChumpDumper]

It's been done. Your denials won't change it.

Still waiting for you to prove God exists btw.

Why are you stalling?

You never said why God has nipples either.

[RD2191]

It's been done. Your denials won't change it.

Still waiting for you to prove God exists btw.

Why are you stalling?

You never said why God has nipples either.

Plenty of proof, look for it.

[ChumpDumper]

Plenty of proof, look for it.

Tell us what proof you have.

And tell us why God has nipples.

[TE]

Knew this thread would turn to and robdiaz continues to show his trolling potential, tbh.

Anyway, the first couple of episodes are great. I'm glad the show is back.

[RD2191]

Tell us what proof you have.

And tell us why God has nipples.

Why should I, I know why I believe in God. Plenty of evidence. Why do you believe in evolution?

[ChumpDumper]

Why should I, I know why I believe in God. Plenty of evidence.

Like what?

[RD2191]

Like what?

Like everything that exist

[RD2191]

Why do you believe in evolution? Lemme guess you read a book written by a man?