Peter Strzok sends TSA to the tree of Woe

[Pavlov]

That wasn’t an answer to the question try again or next time don’t bother quoting my question if you aren’t going to answer it.

I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

[Pavlov]

I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.

My post was about his assertions.

But lol at your thinking email evidence could only be found on one server. What do you think email is?

[djohn2oo8]

I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

[TSA]

And?

He has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.

He hasn’t released the report on the Strzok’s actions in the Russia investigation and the FISA warrants yet you’ve already claimed no bias impacted anything. How?

[dabom]

I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.

What happened to "Hillary did it".

And the government has those emails. That's how the kremlin got them. Nothing really juicy in there. Those emails were posted online already long time ago.

[TSA]

I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

And we both know the answer was ZERO and that’s why you dodged

[dabom]

People looking for a smoking gun in those emails can read them with a 1 min google search.

[Pavlov]

He hasn’t released the report on the Strzok’s actions in the Russia investigation and the FISA warrants yet you’ve already claimed no bias impacted anything. How?

Because there is no evidence it did.

If there is evidence it did, I will change my sentence.

See how this works?

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

And we both know the answer was ZERO and that’s why you dodged

You ask it every time you get bad news.

You get a lot of bad news.

[TSA]

You ask it every time you get bad news.

You get a lot of bad news.

It’s an easy way to down djohn each time he tries to link them to Trump. As you saw it worked, like it does every time.

[TSA]

Because there is no evidence it did.

If there is evidence it did, I will change my sentence.

See how this works?

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

Because you haven’t seen evidence there is no evidence?
No I don’t understand.

[Pavlov]

It’s an easy way to down djohn each time he tries to link them to Trump. As you saw it worked, like it does every time.

Roger Stone says on national TV he's in the indictment and you try to pretend it's not linked to Trump?

[spurraider21]

The #1and #2 have been fired, #2 is charged with a crime. #3 is demoted to HR, reported to FBI OPR, and under investigation. I have confidence the ins ution is being cleaned and will most definitely survive.

why was the #1 fired

wonder how many times this one will get dodged

[Pavlov]

Because you haven’t seen evidence there is no evidence?
No I don’t understand.

What is your evidence proving his bias affected the Russia investigation?

Post it.

[TSA]

wonder how many times this one will get dodged

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question. But at you still clinging to obstruction of justice leading to impeachment.

[TSA]

Roger Stone says on national TV he's in the indictment and you try to pretend it's not linked to Trump?

What crime did Roger Stone commit?

[Pavlov]

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question.

OK.

And, in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said: 'You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story, it’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should’ve won.'

I'll take his word for it.

Do you?

[Pavlov]

What crime did Roger Stone commit?

TSA

[TSA]

OK.



I'll take his word for it.

Do you?

Where’s the rest of the quote?

[Pavlov]

Where’s the rest of the quote?

You are free to post the entire interview if you want.

Question pending:

Do you take his word for it?

[TSA]

TSA

Guccifer had already released the do ents when he and Roger Stone communicated. Nothing in the recent indictments is new concerning Stone. There was no collusion between them.

[TSA]

You are free to post the entire interview if you want.

Question pending:

Do you take his word for it?

You’ve already got it lined up if you posted that quote just post the whole thing.

[Pavlov]

Guccifer had already released the do ents when he and Roger Stone communicated. Nothing in the recent indictments is new concerning Stone. There was no collusion between them.

The word you used is "linked."

It's linked to the Trump campaign.

Sorry. You set the goalpost.

You’ve already got it lined up if you posted that quote just post the whole thing.

I do not.

You are free to post the entire interview.

Question pending.

Do you take Trump at his word here?

[spurraider21]

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question. But at you still clinging to obstruction of justice leading to impeachment.

nah. you pointed to comey's firing as something indicative of the stink/corrosion of the FBI. and yet now you admit you don't even know why he was fired?

[Spurminator]

nah. you pointed to comey's firing as something indicative of the stink/corrosion of the FBI. and yet now you admit you don't even know why he was fired?

The acrobatics of willful dishonesty. TSA has been training for years and still can't stick a landing.