No thread on the MAGA that got smoked in Denver?

[Spurtacular]

No, it wasn't. I asked you why all of a sudden it matters to conservatives that a law was broken prior to the incident that occurred.

I haven't seen any conservative here say it doesn't matter if the law was broken. Get your together.

[baseline bum]

He was a hard 49 apparently.

And he was a ing dumbass who did this before. Seems it was just a matter of time before someone hit back.

Dead Deplorable assaulted others too?

[Spurtacular]

You brought up Trayvon, not me. Where's the video of Trayvon attacking or provoking George Zimmerman?

You can't seriously deny that you and other conservatives have spent hours in here rationalizing when other people have been shot in a confrontation.

There is no video. There is audio of GZ screaming for his life, fortunately.

Yea, I rationalize self defense. You advocate for executions.

It is what it is.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh, look; Dumpster is desperately trying to put words in people's mouths.

you called it an execution, derp.

Who do you think struck first?

Guard or milliner?

Step up for once in your miserable life.

[Winehole23]

"They"

I said no to the $1M

For the record, I also said no.

[MASSA]

[Spurminator]

There is no video. There is audio of GZ screaming for his life, fortunately.

Yea, I rationalize self defense. You advocate for executions.

It is what it is.

Audio

The Denver shooting would absolutely meet your standard for self defense If the victim hadn't been a MAGA and you know it. At least be honest with yourself, you're the only friend you have.

[DMC]

"They"

I said no to the $1M

You didn't vote.

[DMC]

For the record, I also said no.

lmcontrollinao!!

[Spurtacular]

Audio

The Denver shooting would absolutely meet your standard for self defense If the victim hadn't been a MAGA and you know it. At least be honest with yourself, you're the only friend you have.

You haven't thought this out. But that wouldn't make you an exceptional Chumpette.

Was the shooter's life in danger?

[Spurminator]

You didn't vote.

Correct. No soul was sold. Solly cholly.

[Spurminator]

You haven't thought this out. But that wouldn't make you an exceptional Chumpette.

Was the shooter's life in danger?

Another goal post move. Life endangerment has never been the standard for your semen shielding of trigger happy cops.

[Spurminator]

You must have missed the memo. Shooter wasn't antifa. I'm sorry for your loss.

[ChumpDumper]

derp's alts

[Spurtacular]

Another goal post move. Life endangerment has never been the standard for your semen shielding of trigger happy cops.

Uh, you can look at my posts directly responding to you to know that's not true.

But to be clear, you're saying the shooter wasn't responding to lethal force?

Yes or no.

[Winehole23]

You must have missed the memo. Shooter wasn't antifa. I'm sorry for your loss.

[Spurminator]

Uh, you can look at my posts directly responding to you to know that's not true.

But to be clear, you're saying the shooter wasn't responding to lethal force?

Yes or no.

No I don't believe he was responding to lethal force and never suggested otherwise. I also said I'm glad he's going to jail.

What we're talking about here are your selective standards, not mine.

I'm not going to do an exhaustive search of your posts about every black person killed by a cop. You've established your position and credibility here enough that it's pretty clear where you stand. You are free to prove otherwise. I really don't give a .

[ChumpDumper]

Uh, you can look at my posts directly responding to you to know that's not true.

But to be clear, you're saying the shooter wasn't responding to lethal force?

Yes or no.

Did your law class tell you the actual Colorado standard was lethal force?

Yes or no.

[ElNono]

Accessory to murder isn't a civil cause of action.

Sorry, mental fart, I was thinking wrongful death.

They would need to be vicariously liable for the shooter's actions to be liable for negligence. If they're not vicariously liable for the shooter's actions then they wouldn't have any liability at all. Do you know what vicarious liability is?

Maybe Colorado is different, but I know that there's a very limited scope in Texas for when aiding and abetting applies in civil suits, and this is outside of it.

I know what vicarious liability is (part of tort law), and what you would be looking at here is the "Respondeat superior" doctrine. If this guy is an independent contractor, then it would be damn near impossible to sue the Media company, but my understanding is that he's not.

Then again, I'm with you that I'm not sure the specifics on Colorado law, but a good portion of tort law comes from common law, so I can't think it's too different.

[ElNono]

They all did when they sold their souls for 1M.

I don't think I answered to the affirmative on that one.

[Spurtacular]

No I don't believe he was responding to lethal force and never suggested otherwise. I also said I'm glad he's going to jail.

What we're talking about here are your selective standards, not mine.

I'm not going to do an exhaustive search of your posts about every black person killed by a cop. You've established your position and credibility here enough that it's pretty clear where you stand. You are free to prove otherwise. I really don't give a .

Okay, that's all fair enough. You're applauding murder. You don't seem to be alone in that.

[ChumpDumper]

Okay, that's all fair enough. You're applauding murder. You don't seem to be alone in that.

So you've concluded it's murder.

How did you reach that conclusion legally, derp?

[Spurminator]

Okay, that's all fair enough. You're applauding murder. You don't seem to be alone in that.

Nope, for the third time, I said I'm glad he's going to jail. That's not applauding murder.

But I am glad this particular murder victim happened to be a violence-provoking MAGA instead of someone worth a . Small wins.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, for the third time, I said I'm glad he's going to jail. That's not applauding murder.

But I am glad this particular murder victim happened to be a violence-provoking MAGA instead of someone worth a . Small wins.

Okay, fine print I guess. It's low brow; but there's a difference to be fair.

[TSA]

your hero is ed