On a tangent, I can see the argument that having another year of CP3 would be helpful with his experience et cetera, guiding the young coach. But I think it's the opposite. I think Mitch leaned on CP3 last year, which is understandable, but this year he needs to get his assistant coaches lined up, and then begin with his own vision.
Now, do I think the FO will change the assistant coaches at all? Probably not one bit. But they should. Continuity only goes so far when we are trending in the wrong direction. A young European coach. An old experienced former NBA head coach. Something.

Reply With Quote