Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4101112131415 LastLast
Results 326 to 350 of 354
  1. #326
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    The Spurs FO wasn't expecting to have Jackie Butler on board. I bet if they could, they'd rescind the offer to Elson.

    Or at least I hope they would.

    You take the FO for dumb guys. When you make an offer for two RFAs at the same time, you think at the case where you get both.

    Elson and Butler make a lot of sense.
    Elson : solid player (at least it's what the FO think) for now.
    Butler : project with upside for the future.

  2. #327
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    The Spurs would rather badly overpay Francisco Elson than slightly overpay Robertas Javtokas.


  3. #328
    Damn The Man Mr. Peabody's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    4,475
    The Spurs would rather badly overpay Francisco Elson than slightly overpay Robertas Javtokas.

    Javtokas has been highly overrated by the Spurs fans here. He wasn't worth what he wanted.

  4. #329
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    half a leg
    does not cut it
    spurs wanted to make sure his leg could handle a full season and playoffs
    he thought about that and said screw you

  5. #330
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Javtokas has been highly overrated by the Spurs fans here. He wasn't worth what he wanted.
    Eh. He was a much better option than Elson was... and would've still been cheaper.

  6. #331
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    My guess is that it wasn't Elson or Javtokas but Javtokas or Butler.

    They wanted a center with some nba experience and a project.

  7. #332
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    My guess is that it wasn't Elson or Javtokas but Javtokas or Butler.

    They wanted a center with some nba experience and a project.
    This is my view, too.

    I'm not down on Elson. He's going to foul people really hard. Having an enforcer on this team is an idea that came one year too late. Otherwise, he's going to be as productive as either of our unproductive centers last season and we can try to get rid of him next summer as an expiring (or keep... whatever...).

    It all comes down to Butler. This was all a success because we get a budding Jackie Butler.

  8. #333
    RIP D-WILL ro_50's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    223
    My guess is that it wasn't Elson or Javtokas but Javtokas or Butler.

    They wanted a center with some nba experience and a project.
    I think you are right.

  9. #334

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    Go back and read when they extended the offer.

    Thanks.
    The 7 days were up for both today.

    How far apart could there offers have been? Like I said, they needed 2 centers, they made offers to two centers. I don't see why you would think they weren't expecting Butler to actually sign.




    Unless they just sign players to offer sheets for s and giggles.

  10. #335
    Gif-ted LakerHater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    17,263
    Hey what happend to you can't trade a player for 2 mos. after hes been traded

  11. #336
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    The Spurs FO wasn't expecting to have Jackie Butler on board. I bet if they could, they'd rescind the offer to Elson.

    Or at least I hope they would.
    This doesnt make much sense. Even if the werent expecting to sign Butler, how in any way would that make Buford et al to 'overpay' an inferior player.

    Methinks youre too much in love with Reggie.

  12. #337
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Nugget fan continues to say "this guy is gonna be a good player for your team we are sorry to see him go" Serious as can be too.


    But everyone keeps hating on the guy.



    Whatever.

  13. #338
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Nugget fan continues to say "this guy is gonna be a good player for your team we are sorry to see him go" Serious as can be too.


    But everyone keeps hating on the guy.



    Whatever.
    Most Nuggets fans I've read on Nuggets boards have been saying for the last week or so that he's okay, but would rather keep Evans or spend the money elsewhere.

    I don't think Elson is going to be much of a factor positively or negatively for the Spurs. He'll get his 15 mpg and hopefully hold his own.

  14. #339

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    Most Nuggets fans I've read on Nuggets boards have been saying for the last week or so that he's okay, but would rather keep Evans or spend the money elsewhere.

    I don't think Elson is going to be much of a factor positively or negatively for the Spurs. He'll get his 15 mpg and hopefully hold his own.
    What he brings to the Nuggets is probably not as valuable as what he would bring here. They dont' have a Tim Duncan in the post, they don't have the slashers/shooters we do.

    We have very few needs, and Elson fits one of them...in my opinion. Nuggets fans probably feel they have bigger holes to fill.

  15. #340
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,444
    When Nene and Camby and KMart go down next season, they'll be crying like es for the 'cisco kid.

  16. #341
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    But they've got Kleiza and Evans who are supposedly twice the players he is, so they won't care

  17. #342
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Most Nuggets fans I've read on Nuggets boards have been saying for the last week or so that he's okay, but would rather keep Evans or spend the money elsewhere.

    The one board I know of, is pretty pissed that they let him go.

  18. #343
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Kleiza actually is a very good player. I saw him play in person against Utah this year and he was very impressive.


    Right.

  19. #344
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    I disagree because hes still a total unproven player, and hardly got minutes last year compared to Elson.

  20. #345
    Best Nuggets Troll Ever NuGGeTs-FaN's Avatar
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    6,059
    Kleiza actually is a very good player. I saw him play in person against Utah this year and he was very impressive.

    right on

    LK is a stud and he is going to be great in this league. He was very productive in only sporatic minutes last season

    i cant wait to see his production when GK actually plays him some decent minutes

  21. #346
    Best Nuggets Troll Ever NuGGeTs-FaN's Avatar
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    6,059
    I disagree because hes still a total unproven player, and hardly got minutes last year compared to Elson.

    he has already proven himself to the Nuggets fanbase and organisation. The only issue is that he is similart to Najera but has a much better offensive game. He was stuck behind alot of people last season and GK HATES playing rookies. This season he will be great and hopefully get some more minutes if they unload Eddie

  22. #347
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    Will Elson probably start (over Butler)? I'm assuming so since Butler can't play a lick of defense.

  23. #348
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    Will Elson probably start (over Butler)? I'm assuming so since Butler can't play a lick of defense.
    That's what everyone's assuming, but I don't think the organization has actually confirmed it.

    Most everyone around these parts is hoping that Butler will pick up the defensive system and grow into a starting role sometime this season. Obviously, we'll see how it goes.

  24. #349
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Will Elson probably start (over Butler)? I'm assuming so since Butler can't play a lick of defense.
    I think this is a fallacy about Butler's defense. It's hard to gauge, since he played for such an awful defensive team. Perimeter defense porous, no philosophy of help defense, etc.

    He may be bad at post defense, but I see no reason he can't pick it up. He's a hard worker, just hasn't played where defense was job #1.

  25. #350
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    I think this is a fallacy about Butler's defense. It's hard to gauge, since he played for such an awful defensive team. Perimeter defense porous, no philosophy of help defense, etc.

    He may be bad at post defense, but I see no reason he can't pick it up. He's a hard worker, just hasn't played where defense was job #1.
    Yeah, it's amazing how some players can actually play pretty decent defense when it's ACTUALLY expected from them.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •