Yes, I just looked it up. I was mixing them up.
naw the ex was the one he beat up and she had to file a protective order on. this is his 2nd marriage.
Yes, I just looked it up. I was mixing them up.
Guy seems like a pretty quality human being doesn't he WC?
she posted bail?
the senior zimmermans were thinking they finally had the place to themselves.
Never said such a thing now, did I.
I just assumed that because of the way you constantly go to bat for him. Sorry. My mistake.
she should have been arrested weeks ago. florida court dragging their feet. another reason he'll probably walk.
This mutha a really think he has that white privilege on his side. Or does he?
Yeah this first paragraph doesn't mention either...... oh wait:
Again this is the Washington Times. This is not exactly MSNBC we are talking about. In both cases they were getting assaulted or someone they knew was getting assaulted yet the self defense pleas were ignored. It clearly shows that in practice your shield is not what you claim it to be.A lot of attention has been paid to Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law and far too little to the state’s extreme gun sentencing laws. Less than a year ago, I told readers of this page about the outrageous case of Orville Lee Wollard, a lawful gun owner who fired a warning shot in his home to chase off a young man who had been abusing his teenage daughter. Wollard believed he had the right to protect his family so he rejected a plea offer. Unfortunately, a jury rejected Wollard’s self-defense claim and found him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill. A Florida judge was forced by the state’s mandatory gun sentencing law to send Wollard to prison for 20 years.
Not only was it not a shield but mandatory gun laws put his ass in the slammer.
Are you really going to act like a child with his hands over his ears screaming "I CANNOT HEAR YOU!" rather than admit any point?
How about MMA guy recanting? You going to acknowledge that or you just going to be like WC and cling to the way you want things to be no matter what?
Are you just making this up / heard it at da barber shop?
Link?
Google is tough to use I know:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...83O18H20120425
In fairness, the article is not all accusatory. Read it.
chill with the racist innuendo b. i have no reason to lie on this coward. if you're genuinely interested look it up yourself.
googled it. Nothing.
You're just fabricating it to fit your racist troll agenda?
"In August, Zimmerman's fiancee at the time, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman reciprocated with his own order on the same grounds, and both orders were granted."
a. Let me know how this article matches up with Trill Clintons barbershop gossip of quote "naw the ex was the one he beat up and she had to file a protective order on. this is his 2nd marriage."
b. Like you said, the article is hardly accusatory.
zimmerman got anger management where as a brother woulda got 10 years.
just sayin.
lol here you go again with the racist innuendo. there is no reason for it. are you secure with yourself? if so, you wouldn't have to go the coward route and spew that over the interwebs. chill with that.
the only troll here is you. zimmerman assaulted his ex and she filed a P.O. to cover his butt he also filed one. twist it however you like to make you feel better he is a wife beater and has no respect for authority which was shown by him assaulting a off duty police officer. he allowed his wife to take the stand and LIE for him, risking her freedom. keep making up excuses for your coward brethren all you like
Try to be accountable.
And stop making stuff up.
whats the difference between this guy and zim?
actually, you don't need to answer that. you're asking for links cuz its not important enough for you to find the facts yourself.
maybe you should just donate some money.
She filed it first and then he later filed one of his own. She claimed a restraining order on the basis of domestic violence which was granted. That means the judge agreed that she needed protection from him.
The violence may very well have been mutual but I have no idea what grounds he made his request on. Maybe she beat back on him. Fact is that he had a restraining order against him approved by a judge from his previous fiancee with domestic violence as grounds. That's the basis. That he also filed one is besides the point at hand. What Trill said is accurate except she never married him. Is it that difficult to understand?
And what's with the barber shop bull ? You get your takes at the bowling alley? Why don't you hold up a sign that says 'I am a big ing racist!' It goes straight to your credibility in the argument. It's not even self-serving. It's stupid.
he can use the money. took him a couple a weeks to blow through $50K+.
tell ya brother in cowardice that.Try to be accountable.
And stop making stuff up.
lol I like this guy. You are my e-friend Clambake.
lol Fabbs calls a black wife beater a racist term a few pages back but this zimmerman guy gets a full pass from him.
From the article:
"Zimmerman reciprocated with his own order on the same grounds and both orders were granted"
....
Yet you "have no idea on what grounds he made his request on".
Maybe you should STFU?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
