"Muh Sweden."

[tholdren]

Chicken . I accept your surrender.

You've been evicted

[ChumpDumper]

I noticed you abandoned the thread

?

Nope.

[ChumpDumper]

Not until you admit what I said is a fact. The demographics of dying from covid is more like the flu, than the cdc and ChumpDumpers claim that it is more like the kansas flu.. then we can play your riddle games.

Nah, if you insist on its being a game, you already lost. That's why you change the subject.

[RandomGuy]

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"?

So when I said if you do not have a preexisting conditiom or are not over 70 you have a .001 chance of death, I was correct. Thanks.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"?

Nope the flu for not at risk is similar for covid not at risk. And thats the facts.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

Bwahahahaha look at you going on and on.

Riddle me this riddle me that.

Lol. The people at risk for death of covid are the same at risk for death of the flu. Thats the fact. Same demographic

Only your ignorance of the discrepancy between what a model does and what science is keeps you from stepping away from they keyboard.

Continue to twist your previous stance into something to rectify your over reaction.

You were closer with your argument about eviction processes.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

Not until you admit what I said is a fact. The demographics of dying from covid is more like the flu, than the cdc and ChumpDumpers claim that it is more like the kansas flu.. then we can play your riddle games.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

[tholdren]

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

So you did all that. Just to admit you started the argument with yourself. Man you must be triggered.

[ChumpDumper]

agreement is personal defeat for thildren

[tholdren]

agreement is personal defeat for thildren

lol remember when you said none of the models included mitigation? That was almost as awesome as the kansas thing.

[RandomGuy]

flu risk across demographics is almost a perfect mirror for this. Flu tends to kill the elderly at much greater rates.

It is like the flu in that regard.

Only vastly more deadly.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"?

So when I said if you do not have a preexisting conditiom or are not over 70 you have a .001 chance of death, I was correct. Thanks.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"?

Nope the flu for not at risk is similar for covid not at risk. And thats the facts.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

Bwahahahaha look at you going on and on.

Riddle me this riddle me that.

Lol. The people at risk for death of covid are the same at risk for death of the flu. Thats the fact. Same demographic

Only your ignorance of the discrepancy between what a model does and what science is keeps you from stepping away from they keyboard.

Continue to twist your previous stance into something to rectify your over reaction.

You were closer with your argument about eviction processes.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

Not until you admit what I said is a fact. The demographics of dying from covid is more like the flu, than the cdc and ChumpDumpers claim that it is more like the kansas flu.. then we can play your riddle games.

That is not an answer to my question.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

So you did all that. Just to admit you started the argument with yourself. Man you must be triggered.

That is not an answer to my question. Quit being a pussy.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

[ChumpDumper]

lol remember when you said none of the models included mitigation? That was almost as awesome as the kansas thing.

lol remember when you said COVID-19 is the flu?

[ChumpDumper]

Not really an answer to the question. You giant pussy.

If one disease is many times more deadly than another are they "just alike"?

He's started his meltdown.

[tholdren]

lol remember when you said COVID-19 is the flu?

Yep. And I also said if you were at risk of death for flu you were at risk. If you weren't you have the same death rate = .001

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. With real data.

[ChumpDumper]

Yep.

You have a question pending.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

[RandomGuy]

He's started his meltdown.

Pretty much. He is as big of a pussy as Cosmored and DMC. Honest people will answer simple yes or no questions, dishonest ones won't.

It is a litmus test, IMO.

[ChumpDumper]

Pretty much. He is as big of a pussy as Cosmored and DMC. Honest people will answer simple yes or no questions, dishonest ones won't.

It is a litmus test, IMO.

Yep. Such fragile egos on an anonymous message board.

[tholdren]

Yep. And I also said if you were at risk of death for flu you were at risk. If you weren't you have the same death rate = .001

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. With real data.

[RandomGuy]

Yep. And I also said if you were at risk of death for flu you were at risk. If you weren't you have the same death rate = .001

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. With real data.

"disprove my number" is dishonest shifting of burden of proof. Your claim your burden of proof.


Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...243-7/fulltext

Our estimate of an infection fatality ratio of 0·66%

Time for you to show your work. Where do you get your figure? Your claim, your burden of proof.

[ChumpDumper]

You have a question pending.

If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.

[tholdren]

Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-
elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters

CONCLUSIONS:
People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in the hotbeds of the pandemic and
deaths for people <65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon.
Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in
managing the pandemic.

[tholdren]

Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-
elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters

CONCLUSIONS:
People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in the hotbeds of the pandemic and
deaths for people <65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon.
Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in
managing the pandemic.

I guess I was wrong. I said age 70, not 65.... my bad.

[ChumpDumper]

Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-
elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters

CONCLUSIONS:
People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in the hotbeds of the pandemic and
deaths for people <65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon.
Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in
managing the pandemic.

I have a question:

How many people <65 years have underlying predisposing conditions?

[tholdren]

I have a question:

How many people <65 years have underlying predisposing conditions?

Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in
managing the pandemic

[dbestpro]

I have a question:

How many people <65 years have underlying predisposing conditions?

41.4 million adults ages 18-64 are at risk due to an underlying medical condition.

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covi...h-coronavirus/

[hater]

I have a question:

How many people <65 years have underlying predisposing conditions?

20-50% of americans < 65 have this tbqh

lets be nice and say 30%

thats around 75 million americans imho

[hater]

1.4 million adults ages 18-64 are at risk due to an underlying medical condition. kff.org

um no

https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/...es/preexisting

[dbestpro]

um no

https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/...es/preexisting

41.4 million. Missed on copy. Corrected.

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covi...h-coronavirus/