Atheist LOL

[xmas1997]

Of course you have no problems with him. You give his crazy enlightened crap some merit.

I have never really had a problem with you either, at least I can't remember if we did.
As for SBM, you should have read our posts at first, we clashed pretty heavily, the mud slinging was rampant on both sides.

But if both sides are somewhat intelligent, and reasonable, they are capable of ironing out their differences and/or opinions.
You never know from whom your next insight will come from. I got a few from DMC and fuzzy too, but in DMCs case he felt more secure in his accusation that I was a troll. Go figure.
In fuzzys case, he could not refrain from his insulting behavior for me to converse with him in a civil manner. You can't please everyone, he me and me him. It is what it is.

[Blake]

I have never really had a problem with you either, at least I can't remember if we did.
As for SBM, you should have read our posts at first, we clashed pretty heavily, the mud slinging was rampant on both sides.

But if both sides are somewhat intelligent, and reasonable, they are capable of ironing out their differences and/or opinions.
You never know from whom your next insight will come from. I got a few from DMC and fuzzy too, but in DMCs case he felt more secure in his accusation that I was a troll. Go figure.
In fuzzys case, he could not refrain from his insulting behavior for me to converse with him in a civil manner. You can't please everyone, he me and me him. It is what it is.

Neat.

[silverblk mystix]

Enough of the explanations - just bang my wife!

[Blake]

You're an idiot.

[silverblk mystix]

^back to insults ^ predictable ^ boring ^

[Blake]

^back to insults ^ predictable ^ boring ^

^by pure definition, this is hypocritical.

damn you're a dumb .

[silverblk mystix]

^and...it looks ...like ^ yup ^ more angry name calling ^ just checking to see if he realized it yet ^

[Clipper Nation]

^once a snitch....^ always....

^can't invent his own method^

^back to insults ^ predictable ^ boring ^

^and...it looks ...like ^ yup ^ more angry name calling ^ just checking to see if he realized it yet ^

There you go narrating your own posts in the third person again....

[silverblk mystix]

^ is trying to figure out why he is my puppet ^

[Blake]

^and...it looks ...like ^ yup ^ more angry name calling ^ just checking to see if he realized it yet ^

I'm not angry, but yes, dumbass, I've called you names from almost day 1, dumbass.

You're still too stupid to understand what a hypocrite is, dumbass.

Let's see if you still try to claim I'm a hypocrite too.

Dumbass.

[silverblk mystix]

^ more cuck anger ^ coming to the surface ^ it appears she hurt him really bad ^

[xmas1997]

Neat.

Neat?
That's it, just neat?
I was trying to give you some examples, but all I get is "neat"?
Work with me here, Blake.
Yes, even SBM has some truths to impart, as do you.

[mouse]

Work with me here, Blake.

Which Blake are you referring to?

You guys have short memory issues. I told you Blake,Chump,and RandomLie share Government cubicles.

[silverblk mystix]

Which Blake are you referring to?

You guys have short memory issues. I told you Blake,Chump,and RandomLie share Government cubicles.

are they ALL snitches too?

I'd say yes.

[xmas1997]

Which Blake are you referring to?

You guys have short memory issues. I told you Blake,Chump,and RandomLie share Government cubicles.

Sorry, I forgot.
Question, is that Fuzzy character the same? Or is he just antagonistic by nature?
His hostility reeks through each and every post in his attempts to appear intellectually inclined. But once you start discussing things with him he hides behind his pseudo intellectualism as he deflects the discussion toward pissing contests.
He fooled me at first, but I wised up to him quickly. Won't happen again.

[xmas1997]

Which Blake are you referring to?

You guys have short memory issues. I told you Blake,Chump,and RandomLie share Government cubicles.

I have noticed that there is a decent mature open minded Blake, an antagonistic bitter Blake, a curious Blake, and an immature childish Blake, so I suppose it is impossible to discuss things with him .......er, them.

However Chump seems the same each time I read one of his posts.

[Blake]

I have noticed that there is a decent mature open minded Blake, an antagonistic bitter Blake, a curious Blake, and an immature childish Blake, so I suppose it is impossible to discuss things with him .......er, them.

However Chump seems the same each time I read one of his posts.

Fascinating. I'd argue I'm all of those every time except for bitter. I have no reason to be bitter against anyone here.

[RandomGuy]

"Atheism isn't a belief"

Webster disagrees;

atheism |ˈāθēˌizəm|nounthe theory or belief that God does not exist.DERIVATIVESatheist nounatheistic |ˌāθēˈistik| adjectiveatheistical |-ˈistikəl| adjectiveORIGIN late 16th cent.: from French athéisme, from Greek atheos, from a- ‘without’ + theos ‘god.’


lol owning himself!

"rejection of belief in God or gods"

Sorry, your dictionary definition is not the one I would care to use.

You don't get to pick a definition that is not agreed on by both parties, otherwise basing assertions on such a definition is not only logically flawed, it is intellectually dishonest, which is about par for the course for you.

I would, and do define atheism as a rejection of claims about the existance of God.

[silverblk mystix]

"Atheism isn't a belief"









Sorry, your dictionary definition is not the one I would care to use.

You don't get to pick a definition that is not agreed on by both parties, otherwise basing assertions on such a definition is not only logically flawed, it is intellectually dishonest, which is about par for the course for you.

I would, and do define atheism as a rejection of claims about the existance of God.

Either definition does not refute the fact that you don't hold any higher or superior position on the issue of a god.

Rejection of belief - is just that - YOU reject the belief - it has nothing to do with whether there is or isn't a god.

[Blake]

Either definition does not refute the fact that you don't hold any higher or superior position on the issue of a god.

Rejection of belief - is just that - YOU reject the belief - it has nothing to do with whether there is or isn't a god.

Congrats for agreeing with him and moving goalposts all in one post.

Hard to do, imo

[xmas1997]

"Atheism isn't a belief"






Sorry, your dictionary definition is not the one I would care to use.

You don't get to pick a definition that is not agreed on by both parties, otherwise basing assertions on such a definition is not only logically flawed, it is intellectually dishonest, which is about par for the course for you.

I would, and do define atheism as a rejection of claims about the existance of God.

Try not to take this offensively, but Mouse has alleged you are more than one person using the same name but in different cubicles.

[Blake]

And mouse's allegations are relevant how?

[xmas1997]

And mouse's allegations are relevant how?

I prefer to talk to the same person for cohesiveness.

[Blake]

I prefer to talk to the same person for cohesiveness.

A good mediator, in my opinion, focuses strictly on what is said........no so much as to who said it.......definitely not on why it was said.

sorry, but your prospects at being a mediator here are looking rather bleak.

[xmas1997]

A good mediator, in my opinion, focuses strictly on what is said........no so much as to who said it.......definitely not on why it was said.

sorry, but your prospects at being a mediator here are looking rather bleak.

I just offered to help, which is more than anyone else has done. And I never would even considered charging a fee.
But I would be impartial.
Just remember, I offered. And I have done this before and actually was successful. But you have only my word for that. I have never done it on the internet.
Anyway, I offered. 'Nuff said.