so what are you getting at?
Just as easy to ask you.
Thanks again.
so what are you getting at?
Now that you've read the witness testimonies do you think Wilson was justified in using deadly force?
Yonivore just eurostepping s, tbh..
What does that even mean?
Chump read no testimonies, since first of all he says it was THE testimony, which if he's literate and not a subhuman it implies one testimony. There was actually multiple testimonies in court, but that just illustrates he's a moron.
Furthermore, no evidence proved MB was shot from 150 ft. The evidence proves differently as well as the testimony of 10 witnesses who were african american that confirmed officer wilson's testimony.
Don't argue further until he actually addresses the court's mulitple TESTIMONIES and actual evidence. Other wise he's claiming shallow victory over a material fact that no one denied. 150 ft? say's what? That he was shot from 150 ft, or that he was pursued 150ft? 150 ft wihtout context says . 150 ft could be the length of the total s chump takes yearly. Doesn't indict Officer Wilson or exonerate him.
cliff notes:
Chumpdumper once again brings no argument and claims myopic internet victories despite proving he's an ignoramus.
A eurostep, my ..a eurostep..
it's a compliment.
I claimed no victory.
You seem upset by my mere presence though.
Well, that helped ... not. But, thanks for the effort.
Again, thanks, I think.
You're just annoying, Chump. Nothing we won't get through, though.
Argue further?
There was no argument.
I asked some questions.
You really seem upset.
Eh, you're all just bristling when I post.
It's kind of funny actually.
Legally I'm sure there are plenty of reasons to shoot a guy.
In this case? Maybe there was a different way of going about it, maybe not.
In your opinion was Wilson justified in using deadly force, yes or no?
Bristling? No. But, I agree, it is funny that anyone gives you any attention. Some day, we'll learn, I suppose.
In the meantime, glad to amuse.
Did the evidence support that officer wilson was shot from 150 ft?
Meh, just another case to put on Sharpton's sad resume.
Legally, according to the applicable laws and regulations?
Sure, one can always find a reason.
I will allow for the possibility it could have been handled another way, but that's all conjecture.
Who made that claim?
What other option did Wilson have after Brown punched him, tried to disarm him, and charged him?
He could have asked nicely.
Dunno for sure.
I just said I allow for the possibility.
I can't ask anyone to prove a negative in saying there were no other options so I'm cool with it.
no. i'm sure he was referring to inapplicable laws and regulations.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)