Reply With Quote
Westbrook......................................... ....................>Harden>Kawhi>Lebron.......... .................................................. .............>everyone else.
Oh I knowIts inevitable......WB will be MVP. Dont believe me juss watch
still
Kawhi>Harden>Lebron>Westchimp
Westbrook......................................... ....................>Harden>Kawhi>Lebron.......... .................................................. .............>everyone else.
^sure
Frauden doesn't even belong in the conversation. That got is a product of the refs, D'Antoni and the Rockets' stacked roster.
Being a broken record doesn't make it true.
Has Russ ever led his team in every major statistical category before? "LeHype" did it in 2008-09.
How many seasons of at least 25/6/6/1 has Westbrook had? "LeHype" has done it every year except for his rookie year.
Russ is a beast, but he's no LeBron. Nice try, Cristobal.
< 0.500 Finals recrd
Westbrook is part of a group of really good players who are on mediocre teams who have decided early on to attempt to construct their own body of work by just plugging in the numbers, and hoping that it sticks to them and puts them in the same air as the legends. If nothing else, they just want to sell merchandise and have talking points during contract negotiations. That's why someone like Russ would give 2 s about the ASG MVP, because it's another brick in the heartless/soulless wall of comparative stats that the casual NBA fan (like you) can latch onto and bandwagon as if you're rooting for a real winner.Killing your argument. WB trip dubs won 80% of their games, and he played 10 less minutes a game than Big O did to get his 41 trip dubs.
Basically Russ is a fugazi.
Media knows this but they are trying to sell copy as well so they play along.
Lakers are 16 - 31, 0.510 Finals rec
< 0.500 Finals rec
16 > 4.61**Lakers are 16 - 31, 0.510 Finals rec
**denotes 1999 was light 32 games. Therefore Spurs earned 0.61 le details year
Yes, Westbrook does have that. (Mostly thanks to KD and Frauden's chokejobs.)
< 0.500 Finals rec
Only pussies and assholes qualify rings.16 > 4.61**
**denotes 1999 was light 32 games. Therefore Spurs earned 0.61 le details year
Since LeHype is so damn versatile, how come he NEVER averaged a triple dub? Westbrook did.
Why couldn't Kobe average one during his stat-padding prime? Contéstame ese, Gualterio.Since LeHype is so damn versatile, how come he NEVER averaged a triple dub? Westbrook did.
Not his role. His role was to win 5 rangs. He played it much better than LeHypeWhy couldn't Kobe average one during his stat-padding prime? Contéstame ese, Gualterio.
Because he doesn't stat pad, AlvaroSince LeHype is so damn versatile, how come he NEVER averaged a triple dub? Westbrook did.
Kobe ran Shaq out of town specifically so he could hog the ball and pad his stats in his prime, and you're telling me he couldn't average a triple-double for just one in' season? But hey, at least you're finally admitting that Kobe was a role player, Reynardo.Not his role. His role was to win 5 rangs. He played it much better than LeHype
-15 points for deflecting. After Kobe evicted Snaq, it went a little something like this - Kobe 2, Snaq 1. If not for Stern's disdain for Mark Cuban, Snaq is stuck on 3.
Anywho, hard to "pad stats" with players like Kwame, Smush Parker, Cook, Chris Mihm, and Luke Walton on your roster. Despite it all, Kobe still is 2nd in Lakers history in assists and #1 in scoring (to go with 2 more rangs than Martin Lou to the Kang).
Bull . I've seen that head still in the game, up 20+, sitting on 28/9/8 with 8 minutes to go in the game. This is when he should be getting rest, but no, he'd rather take games off rather than lose a chance at a triple dub which is PATHETIC tbh. Despite how much he dominates the ball, Westbrook still had 29 more triple dubs! BAAAAAAAHAHAHA!
Westbrook has surpassed the Kang. That's funny
That means Westbrook is way ahead of Kobe.Westbrook has surpassed the Kang. That's funny
I know English is your 3rd language, but since when is 3 > 5?
Kobe could have kept playing with Shaq. He chose to play with Kwame, Smush, Cook, Mihm and Walton instead. And how convenient that you leave out prime Odom and Caron Butler, whom D-Wade had previously won a playoff series with as a rookie. -48.5 points for that piss-poor
-15 points for deflecting. After Kobe evicted Snaq, it went a little something like this - Kobe 2, Snaq 1. If not for Stern's disdain for Mark Cuban, Snaq is stuck on 3.
Anywho, hard to "pad stats" with players like Kwame, Smush Parker, Cook, Chris Mihm, and Luke Walton on your roster. Despite it all, Kobe still is 2nd in Lakers history in assists and #1 in scoring (to go with 2 more rangs than Martin Lou to the Kang
Kobe could have kept playing with Shaq. He chose to play with Kwame, Smush, Cook, Mihm and Walton instead. And how convenient that you leave out prime Odom and Caron Butler, whom D-Wade had previously won a playoff series with as a rookie. -48.5 points for that piss-poor
This again?
Tuff Juice had artificial stats. I look at him like Love in Minny before he went to the Cavs (and then Silver handed him and LeHype Steph's rang).
-15 more points for bragging how they won a playoff round. Then again, that's all the Clipps ever done so you are easily impressed with such a feat.
I know your brain came optional but Horry got 7. You compare role players to role players.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
