Stupid People like this are as big a danger to this country as any racist

[Spurtacular]

A person who studied 9/11 wouldn't need to beg me for that information like you did.

A person who believed in his , would say how he thought the towers fell without spending five pages dodging the question

[Spurtacular]

One logically follows the other, Einstein.

If Al Qaeda did by themselves, controlled demolition theories do not apply.

muh melted steel

That's fine, but you still haven't explained how a fire took the towers down against all established reason.

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov

How exactly the towers fell and that Al Quaeda did it are two different subjects. This is why I get a kick out of these holes coming in praising you. I doubt they even read your .

Wait, please tell me you're not so moronic that you thought this entire time that I was asking you whether AQ did it or not? Well, besides the fact that that's extra gimpy that you wouldn't say .....I was asking what your scientific explanation was for the towers falling. You still haven't given one.

[Spurtacular]

A person who studied 9/11 wouldn't need to beg me for that information like you did.

You really think I wasn't aware that the govt. blamed Al Qaeda? ING MORON.

[Pavlov]

A person who believed in his , would say how he thought the towers fell without spending five pages dodging the question

I really enjoyed watching you admit your ignorance over and over again after you claimed you had "studied" 9/11. I'm surprised you took the bait for so many hours.

That's fine, but you still haven't explained how a fire took the towers down against all established reason.

Define "all established reason."

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

How exactly the towers fell and that Al Quaeda did it are two different subjects. This is why I get a kick out of these holes coming in praising you. I doubt they even read your .

Wait, please tell me you're not so moronic that you thought this entire time that I was asking you whether AQ did it or not? Well, besides the fact that that's extra gimpy that you wouldn't say .....I was asking what your scientific explanation was for the towers falling. You still haven't given one.

Of course I have. It's not my scientific explanation. It's THE scientific explanation.

You really think I wasn't aware that the govt. blamed Al Qaeda? ING MORON.

muh melted steel

[Spurtacular]

Fire + Damage + Gravity.

It's not that difficult.

Thanks for that caveman explanation. Never in the history of fires though has one of these steel monsters suc bed to fire like that though. And it's not like we don't know for a fact that building 7 was demo'd. Yea, this is where the falls apart for the falsers. They want us to believe that the building just collapsed on its own. How ing stupid is that?

[Spurtacular]

Of course I have.

muh melted steel

Of course you have what? Why you keep laughing at melted steel; I'm not the one believing in that rubbish.

[Pavlov]

Thanks for that caveman explanation. Never in the history of fires though has one of these steel monsters suc bed to fire like that though.

Actually another has.

And it's not like we don't know for a fact that building 7 was demo'd. Yea, this is where the falls apart for the falsers. They want us to believe that the building just collapsed on its own. How ing stupid is that?

No one says it collapsed on its own.

[Spurtacular]

1500 F is not enough to melt steel, you are correct.

There was no melted steel in the towers, and the collapse did not require any steel to be melted, merely hot enough to lose structural integrity, and warp/expand, both of which happen when it is heated to those temperatures.

That you think 1200 ing degrees below the melting point is anywhere close enough for steel to lose structural integrity. Pseudo science.

[Pavlov]

Of course you have what? Why you keep laughing at melted steel; I'm not the one believing in that rubbish.

you still don't realize that melted steel is not a component of the official theory of collapse.

[Spurtacular]

Actually another has.

No one says it collapsed on its own.

Tell us how building 7 fell, then. Tell us how the towers fell for that matter. You're still dodging fundamental questions.

[Spurtacular]

you still don't realize that melted steel is not a component of the official theory of collapse.

And have I been stating it of late? I listed your dumbass official reason. You didn't even regard it once I "did the research." Your is weak, dude. You run in circles like a chicken.

[Pavlov]

That you think 1200 ing degrees below the melting point is anywhere close enough for steel to lose structural integrity. Pseudo science.

wut

[Spurtacular]

There were literally tons of evidence of a plane, along with hundreds+ of eyewitnesses. The plane that struck the Pentagon had to fly over some crowded expressways during rushhour.

The media has consistently blacked out truth tellers. That some people allegedly saw a plane over the city is not much. And a video and the scene with no plane pretty much trump that weak .

[Pavlov]

Tell us how building 7 fell, then. Tell us how the towers fell for that matter. You're still dodging fundamental questions.

Look, my position is the official position. You said you studied 9/11. How do you not know the official position?

And have I been stating it of late? I listed your dumbass official reason. You didn't even regard it once I "did the research." Your is weak, dude. You run in circles like a chicken.

I don't even know what you are trying to say anymore. You're all over the place with your angry posts. Calm down. Take a deep breath before spitting up another post.

[Spurtacular]

Look, my position is the official position. You said you studied 9/11. How do you not know the official position?

I don't even know what you are trying to say anymore. You're all over the place with your angry posts. Calm down. Take a deep breath before spitting up another post.

Tell us in your own words how you believe building 7 and the towers fell.

[Pavlov]

The media has consistently blacked out truth tellers.

Like whom for 9/11? No YouTubes.

That some people allegedly saw a plane over the city is not much.

The testimony fo scores of people is a lot, and it's not all.

And a video and the scene with no plane pretty much trump that weak .

Let's go with the basics here: Do you know what "frame rate" means?

[Pavlov]

Tell us in your own words how you believe building 7 and the towers fell.

WTC1 and 2: plane impacts + fire + gravity = collapse.

WTC7: WTC1 impact + fire + gravity = collapse

[Spurtacular]

WTC1 and 2: plane impacts + fire + gravity = collapse.

WTC7: WTC1 impact + fire + gravity = collapse

So, that's really your neanderthal explanation? You do realize that even under the cir stances of the planes crashing, the towers and 7's collapses defy convention, right?

[Pavlov]

So, that's really your neanderthal explanation? You do realize that even under the cir stances of the planes crashing, the towers and 7's collapses defy convention, right?

As mine is the conventional explanation, you make no sense. I think the brevity of my explanation is commensurate with your study of 9/11.

[Trainwreck2100]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/21/us/cha...est/index.html

Attendees at the packed meeting said they were upset that an August 12 "Unite the Right" rally was allowed to happen.
Demonstrators stood near the dais and unfurled a large banner that read, "BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS." The meeting was briefly suspended.

That's not how the cons ution works.

[Spurtacular]

As mine is the conventional explanation, you make no sense. I think the brevity of my explanation is commensurate with your study of 9/11.

I think the brevity of your explanation is commensurate with your level of critical thinking. And it's not the conventional explanation. For that matter it's not even the official explanation that you promised.

[DarrinS]

[baseline bum]

LMAO that's awesome