Stormy Daniels

[CosmicCowboy]

It is a case of the "magic R", IMO.

The moral, and intellectual bankruptcy required to be a modern conservative means giving people with the magic "R" all the benefit of the doubt, and automatically discounting anyone who says anything bad about them.

It is a cop out, and a chicken one in my book.

Ive already said Trump needs to come clean and just admit he ed those women.

What the do you want?

[RandomGuy]

These women are clearly going for fame and of course MONEY. Why n the take hush money back then, yet now you want to spout off about the affairs? TV shows, news rags, magazines = CASH

What can be presented without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

Feel free to prove that.

[RandomGuy]

Ive already said Trump needs to come clean and just admit he ed those women.

What the do you want?

I am not talking about the women he had sex with.

I am talking about the women he sexually assaulted with unwanted advances.

Do you need me to use smaller words? Draw pictures?

You want to be chicken about a guy who attacks women because he feels en led

"when you are a celebrity they let you do it"

You take the chicken " gee we have absolutely no way of knowing who is more likely telling the truth", when you do have enough information to be able to make a common sense call.

[koriwhat]

These women are clearly going for fame and of course MONEY. Why n the take hush money back then, yet now you want to spout off about the affairs? TV shows, news rags, magazines = CASH

toxic femininity is sickening

[koriwhat]

I am talking about the women he sexually assaulted with unwanted advances...
You want to be chicken about a guy who attacks women because he feels en led

those are your claims and your claims only. you speak as if you are djt's right hand man and as if you were present when/if djt solicited any sort of unwanted advances. almost as good as all white people being nazi's nowadays because joy reid hates whites. lol

You take the chicken " gee we have absolutely no way of knowing who is more likely telling the truth", when you do have enough information to be able to make a common sense call.

common sense flew out the window Nov 2016. just because you hype up the narrative and run with it too doesn't make it true just like RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

[lebomb]

Personally I dont give a damn what these hoes did. Dont care what Trump did either. He and his family will have to deal with it. Everything people do in the dark comes to light one day. Just sayin

[koriwhat]

Personally I dont give a damn what these hoes did. Dont care what Trump did either. He and his family will have to deal with it. Everything people do in the dark comes to light one day. Just sayin

ain't it funny when all these millennials, late 20's, & early 30's dude's/chick's are getting outraged over djt possibly slaying some ho's but they're not outraged they're all personally posting half nude/nudes on all their social platforms while claiming to be models. they're all just 's too except they're not getting a billionaire's dime.

[RandomGuy]

those are your claims and your claims only. you speak as if you are djt's right hand man and as if you were present when/if djt solicited any sort of unwanted advances. almost as good as all white people being nazi's nowadays because joy reid hates whites. lol

common sense flew out the window Nov 2016. just because you hype up the narrative and run with it too doesn't make it true just like RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

I am not bothering to put you on ignore, but you will have to say something worth responding to, if you want any attention from me.

[CosmicCowboy]

"Unwanted advances"

Not Trump specific:

Just curious how a guy today is to know his advance is unwanted until he actually makes the advance?

[koriwhat]

I am not bothering to put you on ignore, but you will have to say something worth responding to, if you want any attention from me.

i did and you responded totally dismissing what i said.

we can speculate all day and night but it doesn't make it truth. that is all RG. are you a conspiracy theorist now?

[lebomb]

"Unwanted advances"

Not Trump specific:

Just curious how a guy today is to know his advance is unwanted until he actually makes the advance?

I dont know, but maybe just meeting a woman and 5 min. later grabbing her by the pussy with both hands? That MIGHT be unwanted.

[Blake]

toxic femininity is sickening

You still have that pony tail?

[koriwhat]

"Unwanted advances"

Not Trump specific:

Just curious how a guy today is to know his advance is unwanted until he actually makes the advance?

that's the point CC. the gears are grinding trying to convince males that they should never approach or deal with another female again.

[koriwhat]

You still have that pony tail?

you try too hard blakey poo.

[RandomGuy]

Ive already said Trump needs to come clean and just admit he ed those women.

What the do you want?

So let's reason this out, and for your sake, since you seem to have an intellectual problem believing bad things about Republicans, let's use a hypothetical.

A billionaire Democrat is caught on tape, admitting that he just moves on women like a . The rich Democrat brags about grabbing women, and says that he gets away with it because he is a celebrity.

This billionaire Democrat has a history of objectifying women, and saying all sorts of creepy about his daughter.

This billionaire Democrat has over a dozen women, some of whom are willing to testify in court, saying he sexually assaulted them, and that his army of lawyers threatened them in all sorts of ways if they ever talked.

This billionaire Democrat cheated on his first wife, with his much younger second wife, then cheated on his second wife with his much younger third wife.

A dozen plus women accusing this Democrat of all manner of unwanted sexual attacks, up to and including rape, and he says he didn't do ANY of it.

The Democrat says he didn't do it.
The women all say he did, and many are willing to testify under oath about it.

Gun to your head, who is more believable? The Democrat or the women?

[koriwhat]

I dont know, but maybe just meeting a woman and 5 min. later grabbing her by the pussy with both hands? That MIGHT be unwanted.

funny thing is, how many of those accusers said he tried such a move? not a one. and how many of those accusers were represented by that ambulance chasing allred and her daughter? lol... how many have proceeded to trial? haha

[RandomGuy]

"Unwanted advances"

Not Trump specific:

Just curious how a guy today is to know his advance is unwanted until he actually makes the advance?

um, ask?

Here is the thing though, law of averages.

We know some guy banged a lot of women, which means he was trying. Do you think all of his attempts to get women were 100% successful? This ONE guy has a PERFECT record of voluntarily bedding every woman he wants?

He NEVER swung and missed?

[koriwhat]

So let's reason this out, and for your sake, since you seem to have an intellectual problem believing bad things about Repbulicans, let's use a hypothetical.

A billionaire Democrat is caught on tape, admitting that he just moves on women like a . The rich Democrat brags about grabbing women, and says that he gets away with it because he is a celebrity.

This billionaire Democrat has a history of objectifying women, and saying all sorts of creepy about his daughter.

This billionaire Democrat has over a dozen women, some of whom are willing to testify in court, saying he sexually assaulted them, and that his army of lawyers threatened them in all sorts of ways if they ever talked.

This billionaire Democrat cheated on his first wife, with his much younger second wife, then cheated on his second wife with his much younger third wife.

A dozen plus women accusing this Democrat of all manner of unwanted sexual attacks, up to and including rape, and he says he didn't do ANY of it.

The Democrat says he didn't do it.
The women all say he did, and many are willing to testify under oath about it.

Gun to your head, who is more believable? The Democrat or the women?

speculation only. good job on proving nothing.

[CosmicCowboy]

So let's reason this out, and for your sake, since you seem to have an intellectual problem believing bad things about Repbulicans, let's use a hypothetical.

A billionaire Democrat is caught on tape, admitting that he just moves on women like a . The rich Democrat brags about grabbing women, and says that he gets away with it because he is a celebrity.

This billionaire Democrat has a history of objectifying women, and saying all sorts of creepy about his daughter.

This billionaire Democrat has over a dozen women, some of whom are willing to testify in court, saying he sexually assaulted them, and that his army of lawyers threatened them in all sorts of ways if they ever talked.

This billionaire Democrat cheated on his first wife, with his much younger second wife, then cheated on his second wife with his much younger third wife.

A dozen plus women accusing this Democrat of all manner of unwanted sexual attacks, up to and including rape FROM YEARS BEFORE, RIGHT BEFORE HE IS UP FOR ELECTION, he says he didn't do it.

The Democrat says he didn't do it.
The women all say he did, and many are willing to testify under oath about it.

Gun to your head, who is more believable? The Democrat or the women?

FIFY

First three paragraphs true and proveable.

Fourth not necessarily true just because first three were.

[Blake]

you try too hard blakey poo.

Neh, you're the low hanging fruit here

[RandomGuy]

speculation only. good job on proving nothing.

Feel free to answer the hypothetical as well.

We all have to make some determination as to the truth. We don't have perfect information on which to base a determination.

I think there is more than enough to push the ball past the 50 yard line. It is more likely than not that Trump is a serial sexual predator.

Is it conclusive proof? Nope. Not the "beyond a shadow of the doubt" type for any given instance.

But overall, the odds that Donald Trump is telling the truth and ALL of these women are lying, seems pretty close to zero in any reasonable sense. Unless of course you want to think that having the Magic "R" means he can't possibly be guilty.

[Reck]

What does Melanie do then? She has been pissed the whole presidency.

She's set if she decides to leave.

Already a US citizen. Parents leeched off Trump and are now here with their green card and Melania pumped out a kid, guaranteeing at least spousal support until he's 18.

Trump

[RandomGuy]

FIFY

First three paragraphs true and proveable.

Fourth not necessarily true just because first three were.

You say that as if his running for president affects the truth of the attacks.

Does it?

Running for president means you can't be guilty of sexual assault?

What if these women thought it wasn't that important and no one would believe them, until he decided to run for president, and thought people should know who they were voting for?

The timing is what does it for you? really? These women have been saying these things well before the election, it's just no one cared.

[RandomGuy]

..

[koriwhat]

Neh, you're the low hanging fruit here

cool story cuck.

Feel free to answer the hypothetical as well.

We all have to make some determination as to the truth. We don't have perfect information on which to base a determination.

I think there is more than enough to push the ball past the 50 yard line. It is more likely than not that Trump is a serial sexual predator.

Is it conclusive proof? Nope. Not the "beyond a shadow of the doubt" type for any given instance.

But overall, the odds that Donald Trump is telling the truth and ALL of these women are lying, seems pretty close to zero in any reasonable sense. Unless of course you want to think that having the Magic "R" means he can't possibly be guilty.

still all speculation. speculation is never truth even if you state it over and over again. it's your opinion and that's all it is.