Page 16 of 56 FirstFirst ... 612131415161718192026 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 400 of 1376
  1. #376
    Believe. Cuck Ross's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    537
    nah

    any cop who shoots someone while defending himself-
    IMMEDIATELY begins to render aid once the suspect/victim/perpetrator/whatever is on the ground dying

    this lends credence to a person just defending themselves and after their successful defense
    they understand that a human being is in distress and needs immediate medical attention

    killers on the the other hand….

    rittenhouse claims his MAIN reason for being there was to put out fires and render aid …
    Now it’s not self defense unless you help the person who was attacking you after you’ve shot them

  2. #377
    Believe. Cuck Ross's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    537
    No, Rittenhouse's justification is that the guy with the gun pointed it at him.

    Bringing a gun to a protest =/= assault with a deadly weapon.
    And the guy testified to exactly that.

  3. #378
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    10,095
    Now it’s not self defense unless you help the person who was attacking you after you’ve shot them
    no one said that

    but rendering aid boosts his claims of self defense

    running away and allowing people to die- detracts from his overall claim

    but of course a trumper would immediately throw out the baby with the bathwater- its what orange traitor taught you

  4. #379
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831
    "self-dubbed teen medic and police auxiliary"

  5. #380
    Long, Dark Blues redzero's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Hornets
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    14,531
    nah

    any cop who shoots someone while defending himself-
    IMMEDIATELY begins to render aid once the suspect/victim/perpetrator/whatever is on the ground dying
    They don't render aid WHILE BEING ATTACKED or if they believe that they are still in danger. I seriously hope you are trolling and not this stupid.

    this lends credence to a person just defending themselves and after their successful defense
    they understand that a human being is in distress and needs immediate medical attention
    No citizen who defends themselves has an obligation, by law, to render first aid.

    killers on the the other hand….
    What? Killers what?

    rittenhouse claims his MAIN reason for being there was to put out fires and render aid …
    And he was attacked. Is he not allowed to defend himself?

  6. #381
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    "self-dubbed teen medic and police auxiliary"
    Are you referring to Kyle or the guy with the handgun who was shot?

    Some groups calling for defunding the police, some cities following suit. Some citizens taking it upon themselves to act as auxiliary officers.

    Nothing at all surprising.

  7. #382
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831
    Who are these "some citizens" you speak of? Are they just a rhetorical prop, or did you have particular activists in mind?

  8. #383
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Who are these "some citizens" you speak of? Are they just a rhetorical prop, or did you have particular activists in mind?
    What part do you disagree with that you need specifics?

  9. #384
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    10,095
    They don't render aid WHILE BEING ATTACKED or if they believe that they are still in danger. I seriously hope you are trolling and not this stupid.



    No citizen who defends themselves has an obligation, by law, to render first aid.



    What? Killers what?



    And he was attacked. Is he not allowed to defend himself?
    AFTER he shot those people “in self defense”

    he could have rendered aid but did not- he walked away

    stopping to render aid would have just bolstered his claim- not made his entire case- but bolstered it

    he was under no obligation (cops are)
    but his claim of being a good samaritan coming to his community’s rescue and his claim of taking emt classes and fire dept training

    sure dont appear valid when he walks away from a bleeding dying human he claimed to be there for

  10. #385
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    144,840
    Are you referring to Kyle or the guy with the handgun who was shot?

    Some groups calling for defunding the police, some cities following suit. Some citizens taking it upon themselves to act as auxiliary officers.

    Nothing at all surprising.
    Was Kenosha, where Kyle didn't live as he is a citizen of a different state, defunded at the time?

  11. #386
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831
    det side eye tho



  12. #387
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831

  13. #388
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831
    What part do you disagree with that you need specifics?
    Of your own take?

    I'm not well situated to disclose that, your own comment lingered awkwardly near the point for a second.

  14. #389
    Long, Dark Blues redzero's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Hornets
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    14,531
    AFTER he shot those people “in self defense”

    he could have rendered aid but did not- he walked away

    stopping to render aid would have just bolstered his claim- not made his entire case- but bolstered it

    he was under no obligation (cops are)
    but his claim of being a good samaritan coming to his community’s rescue and his claim of taking emt classes and fire dept training

    sure dont appear valid when he walks away from a bleeding dying human he claimed to be there for
    That's not realistic given the cir stances and you know it.

  15. #390
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,831
    (Rhetorical prop it is.)

  16. #391
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479

  17. #392
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479


    Good thing Kyle defended himself.

  18. #393
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    The mental gymnastics and pretzeling going on in his thread....in defense of a women beater and killer.

    And why? BECAUSE MAH GUNS AND MAH RIGHTS.

  19. #394
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    10,095
    That's not realistic given the cir stances and you know it.
    is it unrealistic?

    claiming the reason he was there with a weapon he was not legally authorized to carry, there to render aid and act as a fireman and paramedic but NEEDING a AR15 to complete his mission, shooting someone with their hands up 4 times- in “self defense” and then when he finally sees a person in dire need of medical aid

    only to then walk away and refuse to even call 911 for the dying victim…


    that seems realistic to you?

  20. #395
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,388
    Manslaughter for what?

    I'm really trying to find out why people think that bringing a gun to Kenosha voids Kyle Rittenhouse's rights. How does it make sense logically or morally to claim that bringing a gun means that he can be attacked with impunity, and that if he defends himself, it's murder?
    He brought a gun to a riot for the Specific purpose of what?
    Stay the fck away and let the police handle it.
    You are as stupid as this 17 yo old numb skull.

  21. #396
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022

  22. #397
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,388
    Yeah I like to go into the middle of neighborhood riots with a gun from out of state because "Its muh right"

    fkn idiots. this kid and people like Redzero
    Drive to Chicago with a gun into drug country because its your right.

  23. #398
    Long, Dark Blues redzero's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Hornets
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    14,531
    He brought a gun to a riot for the Specific purpose of what?
    Stay the fck away and let the police handle it.
    You are as stupid as this 17 yo old numb skull.
    I'm not agreeing with Rittenhouse's actions prior to the shooting. Agreeing with him and agreeing that he has a right to self-defense, are two separate things.

  24. #399
    Veteran rjv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    9,655
    is it possible for rittenhouse and his mother to get Razzie nominations for the hack job acting performances they staged yesterday?

  25. #400
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,544
    the lunging alone doesnt establish rittenhouse's case here (because if someone had a weapon on you and you feared for your life, lunging could be act of self defense). it matters who instigated the conflict. i think the fact that rosenbaum was the one chasing is what makes this murder charge the most questionable.

    i still think he's also NG for the second murder, but that one is somewhat more ambiguous. the first charge probably shouldnt have been brought from the information i have

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •