if it doesn't in any way affect the outcome of a play, why throw a flag? that is the very definition of a ref deciding a game
i cant see a scenario where gronk could have actually gotten in front of that DB to make that catch... and i was rooting for gronk. i needed 34 points he got my 17![]()
Them Saints vs. Panthers games are going to be must-see. It'll be monkeyball ulative laude vs. Breezus.
It's like they say in game six.. They ain't calling that on the last play
Don't really care tbh. I don't even like Brady. It's just dumb. It's a regular season win. Call me when gets a championship and I'll be happy to give ato a graphic like that.
not showing your pockmarked meth face when indy got curbstomped by the rams
But that definitely looked like a call you have to make. Brady could have made a better throw, imho
Brady doesn't look good this year, can't do anything productive when pass rushers get near him, locking onto receivers, etc.
Kuechly looked like Derek Fisher guarding Brent Barry on that last play. Props to though.
I agree, I wasn't talking about this specific play. I was talking about this rule in general.
impatiently awaiting for me to show up after every Thunder or Colts loss
sad sick life you live, tuna
i see ur point. though if i'm a fan of a typically ty team (which I am) i would enjoy the crap out of big regular season wins (which i do)
Im not a fan of either team bro!
Relax, Im jus enjoyin the game like everyone else!
... But I do enjoy seein Brady & the Patriots lose!!
Think of a player offside in soccer but is not affecting the play - the flag stays down.
Now whether or not the same can be said for the last play in this game, debatable.
- That no call on Barry was awful son
Cam Newton went up against a wounded and depleted pats defense.Tom Brady went up against the 2nd best D in the NFL.To say cam out played Brady is dumb.The Carolina Panthers beat the New England Patriots as a team.
Yeah Gronk wouldnt have caught that ball anyway
But what does the rule say? if the ball is still in the air, do you have to call pass interference ?
Because if it's the case, then they should have called it
Because it leaves the door open for shady interpretations like the one we had tonight. A guy shouldn't be tackling an opponent without the ball even if it is 100 metres away from the ball, imho.
There is so much tension from the reporters in the Bellichick press conference right now
Resistanze
lol there is literally nothing a black qb can do to satisfy people on this forum
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)