Reply With Quote
Depends...it's possible I might, then again it's possible I might not. I said I'm anti-mob...not a saint.
I'm sorry Wally but you are just wrong....they can all shoot threes and the better they are at it, the more they will do it. And Bonner plays as a PF/C almost exclusively on D...
Depends...it's possible I might, then again it's possible I might not. I said I'm anti-mob...not a saint.
Henry Rollins of Black Flag?Dude have you ever read Henry Rollins? I think you'll feel identified with lot of what he says... he is my transgression role modelI used to listen them a long long time ago.
EdIt: BTW, personally I was always more of a Misfits guy...but I liked Black Flag too.
It's really not about getting attention...although it does do that.
No I j ust don't like mobs...we become animals in a mob. Mindless unthinking animals.
Dude... go somewhere now and buy ANY of his books... I know u r a Rep and he is anti bush... bah.. he is anti whoever is at the officeHenry Rollins of Black Flag?
EdIt: BTW, personally I was always more of a Misfits guy...but I liked Black Flag too.... but still... damn he as writer is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than a singer for black flag... he is one of the celebrities that visits the deployed US troops worldwide the most, he has an annual tour for that purpose... he blogs a whole lot about that too...
LOL ok I'll check it out sometime.Dude... go somewhere now and buy ANY of his books... I know u r a Rep and he is anti bush... bah.. he is anti whoever is at the office
I'm not Pro Bush or Pro Republican btw...it's just that he was getting mobbed.
A few of us always need to break away from the herd...for it's own good.
Vaya con dios mi amiga
Matt Bonner
October - 6.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 0 APG .500% 3 PT FG in 21 MPG
November - 7.5 PPG 3.9 RPG 0.9 APG .519% 3 PT FG in 18.4 MPG
December - 8.9 PPG 5.5 RPG 1.4 APG .407% 3 PT FG in 25.7 MPG
January - 9.2 PPG 5.1 RPG 1.2 APG .560% 3 PT FG in 25.9 MPG
February - 11 PPG 6.4 RPG 1.4 APG .500% 3 PT FG in 29 MPG
please change your avatar professor, here is a good one fit for you.Bonner last night
9 pts 3 rbs -/+ -31
I guess your boy went back to reality last night.
Oh BTW, Scola on Feb. averages 13.4 ppg and 10.3 rpg in 30 mpg
yeah I know,Anyone can average a double double in this league..
...
Yea, Parker going 3-16, aswell as playing without 2 of the big 3 had nothing to do with Bonner going -31. If your gonna hate for the sake of hating, try pretending to be smart and know what your talking about at least - then go from there.Bonner last night
9 pts 3 rbs -/+ -31
I guess your boy went back to reality last night.
Oh BTW, Scola on Feb. averages 13.4 ppg and 10.3 rpg in 30 mpg
yeah I know,Anyone can average a double double in this league..
please, you are being extremely naive and setting yourself up big time. I dont read the political forum anymore but I've a strong hunch, that you are not a fan of Obama and you did not support the multiple bailouts we are seeing now. so when Obama makes decisions you dont agree with, you are just going to agree because he is your leader and the people are willing? What's the standard to establish the will of the people, a failed revolution/coup-d'etat or angry letters to your newspaper of choice? and since you are the leader of the anti-mob movement, why weren't you against the war? I lived in the US (east, west, and midwest) for both Iraq wars so dont tell me what was and wasnt the mob mentality.
no longer a true statement? so when argentina changed govt over a year ago from the one that refused to pay the debt (ok this is a bit of a stretch but you probably dont know the reason why) , we ceased to have a government that doesnt pay its bills so your original statement is still false; unless you want to man up and recognize that a change of administration doesnt absolve a government of its decisions, responsibilities, and their historical weight. "even if it once was." oh, i see what you did there, nice cover. please, grow up.
and i find it extremely telling that you have to frame every single argument around your personal point of view. you're pro torture so it doesnt matter that the christian majority citizenship and geneva-convention member state aren't (that geneva convention signing means everyone supported it, there was no revolution, no coupdetat and only 7 angry letters to 2 major newspapers! oh wait, that was several administrations ago, nevermind). If i call Americans torturers its a lie not because the government of America has never used torture, its a lie because the average american citizen has never used torture and doesnt approve of it either.
thats why i made my hypothetical argument in proportions. and i am not going to disprove your re ed opinion because you cant even define homer asshole or even what cons utes an inordinate amount, nor did you ever specify from what population (total population, sports fans, basketball fans, NBA fans, yadda yadda yadda).
Now I didn't say all Argentines were homer assholes, I said an inordinate amount...and I agree we've got you in overall numbers of homer asssholes but I'd say you guys got us on the PCT's. If you disprove I will concede the point for I am nothing if not openminded.
i dont post often but the few times i have have often been to agree with you, i generally appreciate your sense of humor and contrarian nature. but i'm not going to sit and let you make stupid generalizations about my countrymen for the sole reason of disparaging a role player traded almost two years ago so you can "win" some stupid argument with dumbasses like the profesor. if thats how you want to spend your time, go for it. but dont make false generalizations about my countrymen to make your grandiose point.
Last edited by diego; 02-28-2009 at 11:07 AM.
It amazes me how many people still argue with whottt as if he doesn't live in his own little universe... Give it up diego. You'll NEVER get whottt to concede . His ego is bigger than his ability to reason. Its as simple as that.
Ok I think is time to give this thread a break, maybe take it to the political forum.
Scola Rules!!
It's not just that. As stubborn as you may be, there comes a point where pursuing a lost argument for the sake of it is simply not worth your time. What we have yet to find is just how low whottt values his own time. As Golda Meir would say, Peace will come when whottt cares more about his real life than his e-persona. However sad that may be.
Last edited by Ariel; 02-28-2009 at 01:35 PM.
Is that like when freezes over?
Hi...just popped in to say Scola in the ass...as well as all those who like him.
BTW Manumaniac...I am not the stubborn one, the Scola fans are.
It's proven that the Rockets are no better after adding him.
It's proven that in fact, he is their worst starter.
Since that was the nature of my criticism of Scola, not his stats...
You tell my why I should change my opinion, just because a bunch of homer argies, who combined I doubt have watched as much basketball as I have, don't agree with my assessment.
I said Scola wouldn't make a difference...and he didn't.
You guys are the ones that need to admit ya'll were wrong not I.
Futhermore Ariel...why don't you tell the guys that bumped this thread and solicited my opinion in it...to get a life.
Or did you not ing read that part where that was done?
The last time I initiated a Scola conversation was the night Matt Bonner BUTT ED him...ironically enough, no Scola fans were interested in discussing him then...they only want to discuss him when he's having good games.
Me? The Rockets did worse in the post season year with Scola than they did the year before without him..
My point was proven then.
And all ya'll that refuse to admit it because you like his empty stats, his team, or his country of origin.
That's really what's it's all about...not a single ing Argie in this motherucking thread would be making this much of an issue of Scola...if he wasn't from Argentina...
And you either a GODDAMN ing liar, or ing stupid if you don't realize it.
How ing dare anyone of you accuse me of not being the objective one.
How ing dare you...
I'd just like say a big ole suck my to all Scola fans...especially the Argies...
Suck
My
Manimaniac is right about one thing though...anyone that thinks I'm going to change my opinion on this based on the situation as it is now...
Is incomparably stupid. For I will not...
I will not change my opinion unless Scola justifies all the ing and whining his fans have done over him...
Since you guys have whined, and cried, like little ing es, more than LakerFans did when the Lakers traded Shaq...
As it stands right now, Scola will have to win 4 consecutive finals MVP's for me to change my opinion on him...because only then will he not be the most over-rated piece of to ever desecrate an NBA court...
Remember that the next time you want validation of this ing over-rated scrub from me.
Again..if you don't like it, you can suck my .
You first Manumaniac.
I see whottt is back and better than ever......
disrespectful
Well since that forum primarly deals with internal politics and not international ones...no of course I won't.
But the statement I made about Argies...was an international one.
And trust me...like in a war, the enemy doesn't draw lines there...nor would I expect them too.
If I was an Argie I would not say it that way...of course. But I'm not.
Popular vote and PEACEFUL transfer of power...What's the standard to establish the will of the people, a failed revolution/coup-d'etat or angry letters to your newspaper of choice?
I was very much against the Iraq War. But I was also against pulling out after we went in. It was too late then. It was too late to protest then, it was too late to undo what was done then.and since you are the leader of the anti-mob movement, why weren't you against the war? I lived in the US (east, west, and midwest) for both Iraq wars so dont tell me what was and wasnt the mob mentality.
So the only choice for me was get as many positives out of it as possible..and blowing the out of their country and then saying it and leaving it to a state civil war, was not my idea of a positive...it was my idea of irresponsibility. Not to mention wasted lives.
Not really...no longer a true statement? so when argentina changed govt over a year ago from the one that refused to pay the debt (ok this is a bit of a stretch but you probably dont know the reason why) , we ceased to have a government that doesnt pay its bills so your original statement is still false;
Obama ran largely on a platform of completely reversing and being the opposite of Bush...is that the case in Argentina? If so then you'd be right...if not, well than I disagree.
But even if it is different now...I am not expert on Argentina, and freely admit to being ignorant of their current stance on international debt...
In fact that was the whole point I was making...
So even I'm wrong? What you have proved that I was not already admitting?
Well one administration can't be held accountable for the actions of another usually...I mean to me they can't.unless you want to man up and recognize that a change of administration doesnt absolve a government of its decisions, responsibilities, and their historical weight. "even if it once was." oh, i see what you did there, nice cover. please, grow up.
Furthermore, it's not like Bush ever ran on a platform of torture...
and i find it extremely telling that you have to frame every single argument around your personal point of view.
you're pro torture so it doesnt matter that the christian majority citizenship and geneva-convention member state aren't (that geneva convention signing means everyone supported it, there was no revolution, no coupdetat and only 7 angry letters to 2 major newspapers! oh wait, that was several administrations ago, nevermind). If i call Americans torturers its a lie not because the government of America has never used torture, its a lie because the average american citizen has never used torture and doesnt approve of it either.
Must you frame every single argument around your personal POV?
RE: The Geneva Convention
If the terrorists want to clearly mark themselves as an enemy combatants and stop deliberately placing civillians at risk by fighting a covert war, I am all in favor of then receiving the treatment called for under the Geneva Convention...
If they do not want to conduct themselves in the manner outlined in the Geneva Convention, then they should not benefit from it.
You know why they won't adhere to those tenets of the Geneva Convention?
Becuse they will lose the war instaneously if they do.
I support no rules when only one side is expected to play by them.
I feel I defined them quite well...you just don't agre with my definitions.thats why i made my hypothetical argument in proportions. and i am not going to disprove your re ed opinion because you cant even define homer asshole or even what cons utes an inordinate amount, nor did you ever specify from what population (total population, sports fans, basketball fans, NBA fans, yadda yadda yadda).
Must you look at every single point from your own POV?
How very Nationalistic of you...you remind me of myself in the political forum.i dont post often but the few times i have have often been to agree with you, i generally appreciate your sense of humor and contrarian nature. but i'm not going to sit and let you make stupid generalizations about my countrymen for the sole reason of disparaging a role player traded almost two years ago so you can "win" some stupid argument with dumbasses like the profesor. if thats how you want to spend your time, go for it. but dont make false generalizations about my countrymen to make your grandiose point.
Last edited by whottt; 02-28-2009 at 09:25 PM.
Not as disrespectful as this thread is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
