Reply With Quote
Ron Paul unmasking the scam
That congressman is the samw congressman that shocked CNN 3 days ago by telling on live tv the gassing could possibly be done by the terrorists and not assad. Cnn was so shocked she just cut the interview cold
Sure they will. The federal government is notorious for self-regulating.
Ron Paul unmasking the scam
That congressman is the samw congressman that shocked CNN 3 days ago by telling on live tv the gassing could possibly be done by the terrorists and not assad. Cnn was so shocked she just cut the interview cold
When there is treason.
No I didn't.Didn't you say the base was destroyed and inoperable?
Can you even name one thing the strike did?
Jesus, quit jacking off in the forum.
LOL the irony of you accusing other people of not being able to have an independent thinking while thinking you're the one who has it right and that everyone else else wrong is cute.
It's also funny that a simple comment sends you into a downward spiral and meltdown. You're one of those wannabe know-it-all that dont know .
Probably insecurities at work. You should probably work on those before telling other people what they are and what they should do about their ideologies.
Just a tip.
Much Ado about nothing in the long run most likely
Meltdown... ok.
Insecure at work.
Thanks for the palm reading. I love my work so dammit. I guess I need pills? Suggestions?
If I have not read enough or don't think enough to engage in a subject I don't engage.
Try it. And Just stick with your straight ideological line like UNT. It's easy that way.
Grow up and throw away the Pom-poms. Or else, a bitter old man like TSA OR Thread. That's my palm reading.
Its possible.
But it's just another example of what we have sitting at the WH.
Next month he could sign a trade agreement to send advanced gas weapons to Syria and claim we now have created more jobs. Then sign a contract with China to produce the weapons.
LOL in the last two posts you've refered to djohn, buotons, me, tsa, thread, hater and now that unt guy. Something tells me you're the one misserable guy here.
Try yoga and find your zen side, guy.
Yeah. That's right.
The straight party ticket takers imo.
Except for Hater who needs to go with Cosmo. (That's another name; I will meditate as punishment/therapy) Although I did enjoy the djohn that made TSA become TSA.
Last edited by pgardn; 04-08-2017 at 07:19 PM.
Click on 2nd from right icon (says "Insert Video"), and paste YT address.
CNN lol
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7671601.html
Clearly, you're not one of them Darrins. LOL
The "Flynn in major trouble" thread has lost steam.
HAHAHA - I'm surprised CNN didn't cut him off - we don't want them here and they (except the terrorists) don't want to be here.
I am most certain that stuff like this doesn't go without notice to others. Of course, it would be secret communications through embassy channels that we will never be privy of.
If he didn't notify the Russians, that would not bode well. However, in such events, we cannot trust the media to know or tell us the actual facts either.
I've seen some interesting events when I was an Electronic Technician maintaining command and control equipment for the United States European Command Center during the first gulf war. Such classified communications are rarely ever disclosed to the public.
post whatever you like.
now perception overwhelms the truth.
LOL damn I'm actually shocked they didn't cut him off like they normally do people who are not drinking their koolaid. That was great.
I hope we don't send any Americans to war. Keep the drones flying and terrorizing. Trump promised to put America first and to stay out of the fray.
youre only surprised because youre impressionable morons who bought in to the fake news about cnn cutting people off. reflects more on you than cnn tbh.
Matthew Yglesias
✔@mattyglesias
"Trump is an unstable, ignorant, madman with no regard for democracy but I'm glad he's shooting missiles" is a bizarrely popular take.
9:48 AM - 7 Apr 2017 · Washington, DC
Declassified 1986 CIA Report Suggests Longstanding Plans to Destabilize Syria
April 9, 2017
In March 2017, Mintpress News reported on a declassified CIA report that exposes that, contrary to popular belief, the US government has had plans to initiate regime change in Syria as far back as the 1980s.
The report is en led “Syria: Scenarios of Dramatic Political Change” and was written by the Foreign Subversion and Instability Center in July 1986.
The stated purpose of the do ent was to analyze, for “purposefully provocative” reasons, scenarios that would the overthrow the Assad regime.
Although the conflict in Syria, often referred to by the corporate media as a “civil war,” is often said to have begun in 2011 new information illuminates the twenty-five year history of US efforts to destabilize the country.
This newly declassified report elucidates US intentions in Syria and sheds light on the country’s current conflict.
This declassified CIA do ent is not the first example of evidence that points to US imperialist aims in Syria.
A 2006 State Department cable, released by Wikileaks in 2010, revealed that toppling the Syrian government was a high-priority aim of US foreign policy.
In 2007, Wesley Clark, a retired US Army General, stated in an interview with Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman that the US had plans to topple the Syrian government as far back as 2001.
The 1986 CIA do ent, however, clearly points to plans to topple the Assad regime and US complicity in the war that now rages in Syria.
The do ent states that a Sunni-led government in Syria would be most beneficial to the US and suggested that Sunni dissidence would likely set the stage for a civil war.
The report goes on to suggest that the Muslim Brotherhood, considered by many countries to be a terrorist group, should be considered the best option to lead a Sunni-revolt against the Assad regime, and stated that they would be apart of their long-term goals in Syria.
Notably, the Brotherhood is one of the leading forces in the Syrian opposition today and has received over a billion dollars from the US since 2011.
http://projectcensored.org/declassif...abilize-syria/
Ryan and McConnell flip-flop on use of force in Syria to deter chemical weapons
“I’ve concluded that being credible on Syria requires presenting a credible response, and having a credible strategy. And for all the reasons I’ve indicated, this proposal just doesn’t pass muster.”
— McConnell, Sept. 10, 2013
“This was a strike that was well-planned, well-executed, went right to the heart of the matter, which is using chemical weapons.”
— Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), April 7, 2017
==============
“The best punishment for Assad’s war crimes is for the moderate elements of the opposition to prevail. But the President’s ill-conceived, half-hearted proposal will do little to help. It will make America look weak, when we need to be strong.”
— Ryan, Sept. 11, 2013
“These tactical strikes make it clear that the [Bashar al-Assad] regime can no longer count on American inaction as it carries out atrocities against the Syrian people.”
— House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), April 6, 2017
The Republican leaders of the House and the Senate this past week were quick to praise President Trump’s strike on Syria after an apparent chemical weapons attack.
But in 2013, when President Barack Obama was weighing a strike, they were opposed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...t-draw7&wpmm=1
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-10-2017 at 06:32 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
