Reply With Quote
Super-spreader-event. I'll tote a portion of 'em in 14-21 days.all over the USA, today
Like money from home.
tee, hee.
all over the USA, today
Super-spreader-event. I'll tote a portion of 'em in 14-21 days.all over the USA, today
Like money from home.
tee, hee.
[QUOTE=Winehole23;10610817]all over the USA, today
Maybe she should add: no covid vaccine mandate - doesn't stop me from catching or spreading covid.
I know you think that's a snappy comeback, but there's no right to spread a contagious disease and there never has been.
Fox mandates vaccination, too
This meltdown
"keep your laws off my body"
"The law should require everyone to wear a mask!"
Same group
Private businesses should be allowed to require this.
Now go ahead and pretend "the law" and "private businesses" mean the same things.
States can require it too and do — it’s pretty much settled law. Ditto the federal government for its own employees.
pro-life until birth
Really? Flu kills thousands every year and yet no one has been arrested.
You're one of those love the rain not the wet types. Just because the taxpayers don't fund it doesn't mean it's not happening. You're welcome to pay for someone's childcare.. I mean you're ok with giving 50% of your income to the feds as long as they do it, right? You must be since you're using countries as examples who tax the living out of people. Norway's lowest income tax rate is 38.2%pro-life until birth
I'd bet you don't pay anything near that. Of course nanny governments act as nannies.
25% sales tax
Country Last Previous Reference Unit
Ivory Coast 60 60 Dec/21 %
Finland 56.95 56.95 Dec/21 %
Japan 55.97 55.95 Dec/21 %
Denmark 55.9 55.9 Dec/21 %
Austria 55 55 Dec/21 %
Sweden 52.9 32.3 Dec/21 %
Aruba 52 52 Dec/21 %
Belgium 50 50 Dec/21 %
Israel 50 50 Dec/21 %
Slovenia 50 50 Dec/21 %
Netherlands 49.5 49.5 Dec/21 %
Ireland 48 48 Dec/21 %
Portugal 48 48 Dec/21 %
Spain 47 45 Dec/21 %
Iceland 46.25 46.24 Dec/21 %
Luxembourg 45.78 45.78 Dec/21 %
Australia 45 45 Dec/21 %
China 45 45 Dec/21 %
France 45 45 Dec/21 %
Germany 45 45 Dec/21 %
South Africa 45 45 Dec/21 %
South Korea 45 42 Dec/21 %
United Kingdom 45 45 Dec/21 %
Greece 44 44 Dec/21 %
Italy 43 43 Dec/21 %
India 42.74 42.74 Dec/21 %
Papua New Guinea 42 42 Dec/21 %
Euro area 41.7 41.7 Dec/20 %
Chile 40 40 Dec/21 %
Congo 40 30 Dec/21 %
Guinea 40 40 Dec/21 %
Mauritania 40 40 Dec/21 %
Republic of the Congo 40 40 Dec/21 %
Senegal 40 40 Dec/21 %
Switzerland 40 40 Dec/21 %
Taiwan 40 40 Dec/21 %
Turkey 40 40 Dec/21 %
Uganda 40 40 Dec/21 %
Zimbabwe 40 40 Dec/21 %
Colombia 39 39 Dec/21 %
New Zealand 39 33 Dec/21 %
Norway 38.2 38.2 Dec/21 %
Morocco 38 38 Dec/21 %
Suriname 38 38 Dec/21 %
European Union 37.8 36.9 Dec/21 %
Zambia 37.5 37.5 Dec/21 %
Namibia 37 37 Dec/21 %
United States 37 37 Dec/21 %
Letting children function normally when covid is not a threat to them is reasonable.
Preventing the murder of a baby in the womb after the heart beat is detected seems reasonable.
We want to give all our tax money to illegals crossing the border by the tens of thousands, who don't pay back, but we want to have social programs to take care of Americans.
This is the typical American mindset, spend the same money multiple times. Explains why everyone is in debt over their eyeballs.
Which state has stopped forcing men to provide for children they don't want?
There are men that work long hours to pay for children they don't want or were the result of rape or in fact not even biologically theirs. These people don't think twice about the position the state puts men in. Their propaganda bubble has told them that if men face "x" problem then "y" law would never exist. They are ignorant or liars.
Hold on, Winehole23 is still waiting for a tweeted opinion he can post here. It's on backorder.
That's because none of those men go through a pregnancy, period.
The question has always been somewhat biological in nature. The woman has to go through gestation and potentially risk her life in the process. That affords her protection under the 14th amendment.
This is why Roe addressed two competing interests. The 14th Amendment right to privacy that allows a person to choose whether to continue her pregnancy vs the State interest in preserving life (both mother and unborn).
Neither right is absolute, and neither right is above the other. That decision, and subsequent ones addressed this matter as solomonically as possible, well aware that until we have a better solution where the body of the mother isn't involved in gestation, there are no other options.
Federal judge blocks enforcement of Texas abortion law
Judge Robert Pittman barred the law from being enforced by "the State", an order that expands even to judges and clerks.
Pittman refused to stay his ruling pending appeal, saying that "The State has forfeited the right to any such accommodation by pursuing an unprecedented and
aggressive scheme to deprive its citizens of a significant and well-established cons utional right."
https://www.rawstory.com/judge-blocks-texas-abortion-law
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-06-2021 at 08:38 PM.
This point will not be addressed by pro life Nathan or any of the other pro lifers here. It will also not be addressed by pro choice DMC, but he might continue to attempt to shift the conversation to taxes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
