Reply With Quote
Obviously it never happened
How about $500 Trump loses PA and OH?
Go look for it, stick. I accepted, you ignored.pussy. Probably haven't ever had $500 cash in your pathetic life. Probably went $35k in debt to Trump U
Link your offer, I didn't see it
Obviously it never happened
How about $500 Trump loses PA and OH?
Are you lazy or just too stupid to do a search, Splits?
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8609455
- also, don't need cash. but if you want me to put money on it w/e, sure
Mitch, not only are you an election cycle tourist in the political forum, I'm starting to get the felling you're a pussy as well.
Go back upstairs, dumbass.
I don't hang out upstairs. So if splits becomes cub's shoe shiner if trump wins, what's your debt should Hillary win? You seemed to have left that out of your big boy bet.
That's your "bet"?
That if Trump wins I shine Dale's shoes and if he loses then nothing?
you're a ing amateur
Name your bet, . I've aleady given you multiple with favorable odds. You've specified nothing.
Just like your hero racist. All talk, no action.
Pussy
^ he's ing you pretty good there Mitch? Whatcha gonna do?
That's your "bet"?
That if Trump wins I shine Dale's shoes and if he loses then nothing?
Name your bet, . I've aleady given you multiple with favorable odds. You've specified nothing.
Just like your hero racist. All talk, no action.
PussyToo stupid to read, Splits? Original bet was who wins presidency and you never replied. If you want me to put money on it, w/e, but I got no interest in you putting money on it - it's not an incentive to take from the poorbut if you want me to put money on it w/e, sure
That makes no ing sense.Too stupid to read, Splits? Original bet was who wins presidency and you never replied. If you want me to put money on it, w/e, but I got no interest in you putting money on it - it's not an incentive to take from the poor
Make me a bet if you're too pussy to accept the ones I've offered
you'd be smarter to take the 5 points in PA. But it's become obvious you have no idea what you're doing. You best head back upstairsToo stupid to read, Splits? Original bet was who wins presidency and you never replied. If you want me to put money on it, w/e, but I got no interest in you putting money on it - it's not an incentive to take from the poor
It's like talking to a ing child...
Here I'll simplify it for you
Trump wins - you shine cub's shoes for an indefinite amount of time
Hillary wins - what do you want, 500 dollars? fine
Bet is off if for whatever reason either candidate is replaced during the GE.
It's like talking to a ing child...
Here I'll simplify it for you
Trump wins - you shine cub's shoes for an indefinite amount of time
Hillary wins - what do you want, 500 dollars? fine
Bet is off if for whatever reason either candidate is replaced during the GE.
Your bet doesn't make sense imo. If you win, the penalty is being Cully's shoe shiner? What does that even mean? Since you're already putting money if you lose, make Split give something that is attainable to you. Ie money.It's like talking to a ing child...
Here I'll simplify it for you
Trump wins - you shine cub's shoes for an indefinite amount of time
Hillary wins - what do you want, 500 dollars? fine
Bet is off if for whatever reason either candidate is replaced during the GE.
500 bet. Loser pays it.
Do it.
Just means he'll be kissing Cub's ass for the rest of this website's life
I'm not a gambling man, Reck. If splitsy wants money so bad for me to have a fun bet, no skin off my nose.
So you're basically saying you will welch no matter what.Just means he'll be kissing Cub's ass for the rest of this website's life
I'm not a gambling man, Reck. If splitsy wants money so bad for me to have a fun bet, no skin off my nose.
You've got less dignity than Trump.
Pussy.
Can't make this up, tbh
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-env...policy-in-2009
Trump asked for 'meaningful' climate change policy in 2009
Holy !
Hatch wants us to ‘be nice’ to flailing, amateurish Trash
“My experience with Donald Trump is he doesn’t have a prejudiced bone in his body,” Hatch said.
Perhaps the senator was thinking of a different person named Donald Trump.
Hatch went on to make an appeal on behalf of his party’s presumptive presidential nominee. The L.A. Times reported:
Another top Republican, Sen. Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, sounded a similar plea for leniency, saying a person as new to politics as Trump will say “stupid” and “outrageous” things.
“Be nice to him,” said Hatch. “He’s a poor first-time candidate.”
The GOP senator may have been trying to be funny, but it prompted the Huffington Post’s Igor Bobic to note,
“Donald Trump is the presumptive GOP nominee, but members of his own party keep excusing his outrageous behavior as if he’s a pre-adolescent whose cognitive functions and sense of right and wrong haven’t fully developed.”
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
Repugs are SO ed, it's hilarious.
Iowa lawmaker has seen enough, gives up GOP allegiance
State Sen. David Johnson, one of the senior members of the Iowa Senate, says he has suspended his Republican Party membership to protest “the racist remarks and judicial jihad” by presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. […]
“I will not stand silent
Johnson said, referring to Trump.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
Repugs!
Party of Lincoln!
Iowa!
Repugs and their base (now supporting racist, bigoted Trash) are not racist, bigoted for 60+ years!
Party of Lincoln!
Laughing at Iowa
"And when it comes to Donald Trump, there are invertebrates that have shown more spine than Sen. Charles Grassley."
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/2016/06/08/editorial-grassley-ignores-judicial-crisis-and-trumps-racism/85549460/
Donald Trump’s ‘huge and not widely understood’ disadvantage
money is proving to be one of Trump’s biggest pitfalls.
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Trump, who’s abandoned his promises about self-financing, finds himself “reliant on party fundraisers who haven’t all swung into action and aren’t always in sync with his campaign promises.”
The WSJ article quoted Fred Malek, the finance chairman of the Republican Governors Association and a leading fundraiser for past GOP nominees, describing Trump’s fundraising disadvantage as “huge and not widely understood.” Malek added, “Unless he’s willing to write a huge personal check, which is unlikely, I believe Trump will have a financial disparity of $300 million to $500 million.”
What about Trump’s boasts last summer that he’s prepared to spend $1 billion on the presidential race? Those claims now appear ridiculous. He has no intention of writing that kind of check; few believe he’ll be able to raise anywhere close to that kind of money; and in an interview with Bloomberg Politics yesterday, Trump downplayed the figure’s significance.
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump distanced himself from his own fundraising estimate of $1 billion, refusing to commit to collecting even half that amount, and saying his campaign didn’t need much money to win the White House.
Trump, who has held just two major fundraising events since agreeing three weeks ago to help the party raise cash, said he would rely instead more on his own star power as a former reality-TV personality to earn free media, and has no specific goals for how much money his campaign needs.
“There’s no reason to raise that,” Trump told Bloomberg Politics about raising $1 billion. “I just don’t think I need nearly as much money as other people need because I get so much publicity. I get so many invitations to be on television. I get so many interviews, if I want them.”
If only it were that simple.
When Hillary Clinton and her allies raise money for the general election, much of the money will go towards campaign advertising – which means they’ll pick the issues, they’ll control the message, they’ll target the audience, and they’ll manage their own calendar.
When Donald Trump relies on his “star power as a former reality-TV personality to earn free media,” he’s referring to news interviews – in which media professionals pick the issues and press the Republican candidate to explain and/or defend himself. If recent history is any guide, Trump has an unfortunate habit of making problematic comments during many of these interviews, which creates a controversy he and his campaign have to spend days dealing with.
Postscript: Just as an aside, now that Trump is raising money from GOP mega-donors, he looks an awful lot like his former Republican rivals whom he condemned as “puppets” of moneyed interests.
Asked recently for an explanation, he said this money is only going to the Republican Party, not his campaign. For the record, this is demonstrably untrue.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
https://twitter.com/JackPMoore/status/740074838161686529/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Smart People LAFFING at the Klown of fake skin, fake hair, but TRUE pot belly
Last edited by boutons_deux; 06-09-2016 at 09:46 AM.
McConnell tries teaching someone to ‘act’ like a candidate
Watching Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) talk about Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, it occurred to me we’re all stuck in one long, occasionally excruciating episode of “Faking It” – better known as the 2016 presidential election.
Consider this comment from McConnell on CNN yesterday:
“We have an obligation here in 2016 to see if we can turn this country around.
And the primary voters have selected Donald Trump to be the change agent, and what
we’re trying to do is to get him to act and speak like a serious presidential candidate.”
Note, it goes without saying – in McConnell’s case, literally – that Donald Trump isn’t a serious presidential candidate. He’s not going to become a serious presidential candidate. He will never be a serious presidential candidate.
But what Republican officials are “trying to do is to get him to act and speak like a serious presidential candidate.”
In other words, in this elaborate episode of “Faking It,” GOP officials are the coaches putting an amateur through a crash course before he has to compete with an actual presidential candidate who knows what she’s talking about.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
