tick tock
“the SCOTUS docket is showing that the case was filed HUGE VICTORY BIDEN IS TOAST!”
Margot Cleveland!
My bad, Margot knows what she's talking about:
i dont deny that they addressed it in the brief. standing was addressed in all these cases that have been thrown out for lack of standing too
"vote dilution" has been rejected as a good argument for legal standing so far in all the cases we've seen. texas' claim basically amounts to that as well. the EC being zero sum does add a layer to it, admittedly
Margot Cleveland!
We all knew trump's team would come up with a hail mary, and it's fun discussing it and all, but we all also know this is just circus with O chance of success.
Yeah, also the notion that the Electoral College is a 'contest' and Texas is set to 'lose' is quite the novel argument. The contest are the elections, the electors are simply a formality.
Plus, I'd like to hear the argument that Texas, as a State, is harmed because a Republican won't be the president.
Do hurt feelings in Texas count?
Think of the boat owners.
lol she knows how judges think.
Read the tweet, genius (if you can go through more than one sentence). She's saying she thinks it has no chance of success and I was doubly laughing at your stupidity.
But I forget I was talking to a trumper. Next time I'll use the blue font. And thanks for bringing a lawyer to defend your leader that basically says he's done
my question is how many
how many cases need to be thrown out
how many twitter videos purporting to show fraud need to be easily explained away
how many trump lawyers have to tell the court "we are not alleging fraud"
how many hand-recounts affirming the results (dispelling the notion that the machines rigged the results)
how many of these until people realize that it's not happening, and that biden kinda just won?
How much fraud do you need to see? How much intimidation tactics do you need to see?
How much illegitimate electoral acts do you need to see?
How much big tech censorship do you need to see?
How much fake news do you need to believe in?
How many anomalies does there have to be?
How many mathematical impossibilities?
How many impossible huge vote dumps?
How much voter machine fraud?
How much until you realize Trump's second term is coming?
No she doesn't think it has a chance of success. I was laughing at you instantly dismissing her and then immediately coming back and saying she knows what she's talking about because you read something from her you agreed with.Read the tweet, genius (if you can go through more than one sentence). She's saying she thinks it has no chance of success and I was doubly laughing at your stupidity.
But I forget I was talking to a trumper. Next time I'll use the blue font. And thanks for bringing a lawyer to defend your leader that basically says he's done
Delusion is a powerful drug.
What's your path to victory?
any credible ones that would carry with it the ability to flip a state or two
nothing to do with the election resultsHow much big tech censorship do you need to see?
noneHow much fake news do you need to believe in?
i dont care for these at all. i need hard evidence of malfeasance or fraud.How many anomalies does there have to be?
How many mathematical impossibilities?
i havent seen any "impossible" dumpsHow many impossible huge vote dumps?
any tbh... preferably to the scale that it tilted the election resultsHow much voter machine fraud?
just need enough evidence to support a claim that multiple states had illegitimate elections as a result of some widespread fraud or malfeasance. unfortunately havent seen any of thatHow much until you realize Trump's second term is coming?
Then why do it?
Math hurts my feelings
Nonetheless, you have hard evidence. You have video footage. You have affidavits. Etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
