So two specialists said it was possible that your child could be vaccinated, with a modest modification of the regimen.
Despite what conservatives and libertarians seem to think, ethical choices do not happen in a vacuum. Your choices affect others.
Your choice to have an unvaccinated child running around means a couple of things ethically:
Your child is at risk of dying from something.
Your child is at risk of spreading something to someone else, who could end up dying.
You have made the choice with being comfortable with balancing the risk between allergic reaction and vaccinating.
Are you comfortable with possibly causing someone else's death?
You didn't answer my question.
You did say that your primary concern was that of your child, so the lack of an answer to me means you don't want to come out and admit it.
Yes, you are comfortable with possibly causing the death of another human being, to save your child from what amounts to some discomfort, if the experts who say that is it possible to vaccinate your child safely are to be believed.
My actual view:
I understand, really I do. It is a hard call to make, and I have certainly had some scares with a kid with life-threatening allergies.
I just think it would be better, were you to be honest about the ethical implications of your decision.
Make the call you want to, just don't delude yourself about reality, however uncomfortable.

Reply With Quote

